was hitler really a good guy?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
redfella
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 7:00 am

Post by redfella »

Geebs, Hitler didn't exist, it's all a hoax.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

(I'm joking Freakaloin, you dumbfuck)
black & white blanket logic
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

Ryodox wrote:
Salinga wrote:...and breached the pride of a nation, still after centuries isn't restored.
Centuries? Lol, Hitler ruled 1933-1945, buddy. Also, your spelling is shit.

I am glad that some of the more educated people here realize that a lot that is claimed about uncle Dolf is a lot of propaganda.

P.S. For more information on the "death camp" Auschwitz, please watch this movie: http://www.solargeneral.com/av/DavidColeatAuschwitz.wmv
omg you are an idiot
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

Did we say death camps? We meant "Happy Camps"!
redfella
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 7:00 am

Post by redfella »

http://www.nizkor.org/hw...s/auschwitz/crematoria/
Total Days ... 549
Total Capacity (bodies) ................ 1,018,350

Clearly, as we can see, the incineration capacity of the Kremas was enourmous. Far in excess for incinerating 48,000- or even 480,000 -people. In fact, using the 48,000 number of "natural deaths" and the incineration capacity of 1,018,350 bodies for this period we see that the Kremas had a capacity of just over 21 times the "natural" death rate! Such "overkill" simply boggles the mind. There is no rational reason why such a incineration capacity is required. A _single_ crematorium such as Krema V (with lesser capacity than Kremas II or III) had a monthly capacity of 37,000 bodies per month and was excessive. If simply handling the bodies from "natural causes" was all that was _really_ intended, even the old crematorium, Krema I, would have easily sufficed with its cpacity of about 10,000 bodies a month! (Even then it would _still_ have had twice the required capacity!)

As has been pointed out by many "tradionalists" here in alt. revisionism, there can be only one rational explination for such an enourmous incineration capacity: The Nazis intended to kill far more than 48,000 (or 70,000) or even 480,000 people! (And they could do so pretty fast too, as we can see from the September number of 176,700.) With Kremas II, III, and V running at capacity the Nazis could theoretically have incinerated 2 million people a year!

It is a chilling thing, given such numbers, to realize that even when Kremas II, III, and V were used during the extermination of the Hungarian Jews, in the summer of 1944, that they were overwhelmed by the bodies of those they murdered, requiring the use of the incineration pits to augment the Kremas. It seems that the bloodlust of the Nazis knew no limit....

...Just as the deniers here, in trying to rationalize the Kremas as being used just for "natural" deaths, know no shame.
black & white blanket logic
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

The problem's not even the Holocaust. The holocaust deniers claim that it's used as excuse by Jews to do whatever they like, conveniently ignoring that even if you discount the holocaust, they've been spending the last 2000 years getting fucked over.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Ryodox. :icon27:
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Geebs wrote:Oh great, holocaust denial. You can't really blame hitler for everything done by germany though, after all he got democratically elected on an antisemitic tip....
Sounds GeeDubya was his understudy.
Post Reply