Page 4 of 4
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:31 pm
by Doombrain
DLP fucking sucks
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:39 pm
by Deathshroud
After buying an LCD I would say viewing angle is very important.

Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:41 pm
by Chupacabra
ive also heard that pioneers are king.
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:46 pm
by YourGrandpa
Their Elite series.
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:54 pm
by Doombrain
well they are plasma and no matter what you may think, plasma's a dying tech.
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:04 am
by shaft
mac wrote:
as i can't stand the soap effect you get on every lcd tv with that, the interpolated images make movies look like cheap tv productions imho.
so for me 100hz+ is an overrated feature, you for example, like. different tastes.
This tv has 3 different levels of "CineMotion" 3/2 Pulldown Processing, and 3 levels of their "Motionflow" 120Hz Tech. Setting both on medium looks good to me, turning them both on high looks unnatural and turning them off makes shit look blurry now that I'm use to it.
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:08 am
by Doombrain
do hummer make a tv?
Re: So Blu-ray...
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:41 am
by MKJ
interesting. didnt think about pioneer but it seems thats not a bad thing.
moving soon so thats a nice reason to ditch this old tv and get a new one, along with a new speakersystem (paradigms, mmm).
important issue for me, i think, is view angle. and high contrast. and multiple inputs. and, shi.. too many reqs :s