Is the Green party opposed to GM foods and generally luddite leaning?
Of the criticisms levelled against stereotypical environmentalists is that they've co-opted socialist luddite policies to the detriment of the movement. I think there is something to those claims having read environmentalist group blogs that deify nature and equate environmentalism with religion.
edit:
[xeno]Julios wrote:I figure if I'm gonna vote for them, I should try to learn about them, unlike last time where i just blindly voted for 'em
When it comes to energy, we can build more power plants and create more pollution, or we can take steps to rebuild factories, renovate homes, refit businesses, redesign products, reassess priorities and reduce waste.
Power plants are very expensive and require a lot of imported machinery. Conservation activities, on the other hand, match local know-how with sustained effort and they create many more jobs per dollar of public spending.
Our three-step program will:
Reduce energy demands and create good jobs through conservation and efficiency measures.
Develop renewable and alternative energy sources to phase out fossil fuel and nuclear power within fifty years.
Focus on future energy and soft energy technologies.
Conservation is nice but even with improvements in efficiency and reduced wastefulness, energy demands will continue to rise indefinitely. That doesn't mean our demand for energy will indefinitely pollute and destroy the environment, though.
if he's gonna be anything at all like mike harris, watch the fuck out. the only thing that left ontario with any semblance of canada was the fact we had a little federal help to fall back on.
however i saw a little program on polls and how they have changed from the past. pollsters can get as high as 90% refusal rate in participation. basically they are shit and cannot be trusted at all.
@MQ, have you been paying attention to the ipperwash inquiry?(harris related)