Your world is waiting...
https://quake3world.com/forum/
no homo..we've been growing more than 1000 plants in my area..too bad our 10000+ plants got copped in St-Hyacinthe or I'd be a billionnaire by now..hmmm maybe next year..jellus?Freakaloin wrote:3 years eh? how many plants? 1 or 2?
No, it wasn't. I know as fact that it didn't happen to me. I'm sorry you can't admit that some people don't experience dependancy like you do. Cigarettes on the other hand I've been having a harder time with because they are addictive. I understand what you're saying as I've seen people that have the cravings when they are out. But not everyone does.Kracus wrote:I'm not saying there are adverse affects I'm just saying the craving to go smoke a joint IS there. It might be easy to tolerate if you need to but there is a craving which would indicate somekind of addictiveness. You guys can fucking say it doesn't exist all you want but I've experienced it and know better. So this isn't a being right or wrong this is fact I know because I've experienced it.
i prefer not to commit to a given theory of mind, which is why I talk about mental events being correlated in some way with physical events.Massive Quasars wrote:He's not being entirely clear. If he had said every mental event had a physical cause (in one direction only) it would be epiphenomenalism.seremtan wrote:physicalist - exact opposite.Massive Quasars wrote: epiphenomenalist? :icon30:
also believe the article said only 10% suffered from the dependencyKracus wrote:Yeah, if you put it that way.
[xeno]Julios wrote:i prefer not to commit to a given theory of mind, which is why I talk about mental events being correlated in some way with physical events.Massive Quasars wrote:He's not being entirely clear. If he had said every mental event had a physical cause (in one direction only) it would be epiphenomenalism.seremtan wrote: physicalist - exact opposite.
But even this is presupposing a distinction between mental and physical, so the way I phrased the original statement isn't really compatible with identity theories of mind, or hardcore physicalism.
I like conceiving of the mind/brain in an epiphenomenal manner (MQ you were correct in picking that out) just for the sake of theoretical utility (there is a certain accuracy about epiphenomenalism in that at least we are preserving the toplogy of physical activity) but I also think the identity theorists may be onto something.
Honestly, the mind body problem is one that I've never been able to come to terms with.
I too find philosophy of the mind difficult, I haven't really staked out a position from which to defend (even as I find some arguments more convincing than others in reading). Though I'm relatively confident humans don't have classical free will.[xeno]Julios wrote: i prefer not to commit to a given theory of mind, which is why I talk about mental events being correlated in some way with physical events.
But even this is presupposing a distinction between mental and physical, so the way I phrased the original statement isn't really compatible with identity theories of mind, or hardcore physicalism.
I like conceiving of the mind/brain in an epiphenomenal manner (MQ you were correct in picking that out) just for the sake of theoretical utility (there is a certain accuracy about epiphenomenalism in that at least we are preserving the toplogy of physical activity) but I also think the identity theorists may be onto something.
Honestly, the mind body problem is one that I've never been able to come to terms with.
Or any of us try to stop to post and read this forum cold turkey.scourge34 wrote:No, it wasn't. I know as fact that it didn't happen to me. I'm sorry you can't admit that some people don't experience dependancy like you do. Cigarettes on the other hand I've been having a harder time with because they are addictive. I understand what you're saying as I've seen people that have the cravings when they are out. But not everyone does.Kracus wrote:I'm not saying there are adverse affects I'm just saying the craving to go smoke a joint IS there. It might be easy to tolerate if you need to but there is a craving which would indicate somekind of addictiveness. You guys can fucking say it doesn't exist all you want but I've experienced it and know better. So this isn't a being right or wrong this is fact I know because I've experienced it.
4days wrote:if you quit smoking dope after smoking heavily for a long time, it can mess your stomach up for a while. i don't know the science of it, but it can.
someone read a book..Freakaloin wrote:[xeno]Julios wrote:i prefer not to commit to a given theory of mind, which is why I talk about mental events being correlated in some way with physical events.Massive Quasars wrote: He's not being entirely clear. If he had said every mental event had a physical cause (in one direction only) it would be epiphenomenalism.
But even this is presupposing a distinction between mental and physical, so the way I phrased the original statement isn't really compatible with identity theories of mind, or hardcore physicalism.
I like conceiving of the mind/brain in an epiphenomenal manner (MQ you were correct in picking that out) just for the sake of theoretical utility (there is a certain accuracy about epiphenomenalism in that at least we are preserving the toplogy of physical activity) but I also think the identity theorists may be onto something.
Honestly, the mind body problem is one that I've never been able to come to terms with.
WTF?
like i said, i don't know. but i quit cigarettes a while back (started having them with beer againhate wrote:4days wrote:if you quit smoking dope after smoking heavily for a long time, it can mess your stomach up for a while. i don't know the science of it, but it can.
how so...
) and quit dope at the same time. complained to the nurse who was monitoring me for the quitting smoking thing that i'd been getting really bad gastric reflux and she said that she'd seen similar problem a lot before with people who suddenly stopped smoking lots of weed.does she bring home good stuff from work?Freakaloin wrote:lol...my wife is an anesthetist and she thinks the nurse who told u that is a moron...she says...any questions?...
interesting...4days wrote:like i said, i don't know. but i quit cigarettes a while back (started having them with beer againhate wrote:4days wrote:if you quit smoking dope after smoking heavily for a long time, it can mess your stomach up for a while. i don't know the science of it, but it can.
how so...
thinking about it though, that's just as likely to be behavioural as anything else.
Freakaloin wrote:lol...my wife is an anesthetist and she thinks the nurse who told u that is a moron...she says...any questions?...
How did you get your wife to go along with that?Freakaloin wrote:i supply myself moron...questions?Ryoki wrote:Did your supplier get arrested or something?
There is a great artcle by Peter van Inwagen which links our conceptual capacities to the apparent insolubility of mind/body problem. But fuck me I can't remember the title....I'll drop it in here if I can find the relevant book.[xeno]Julios wrote:
Honestly, the mind body problem is one that I've never been able to come to terms with.
lose the house? where do u live...china?SmokeyTreats wrote:How did you get your wife to go along with that?Freakaloin wrote:i supply myself moron...questions?Ryoki wrote:Did your supplier get arrested or something?
I suggested growing our own to mine and she freaked out screaming shit like "we could lose the house!".
Freakaloin wrote:
lose the house? where do u live...china?
