Quake3World

Doombrain wrote:

tnf wrote:

Doombrain wrote:anyone else having issues with disk reading? i'm having the same issue as discodave had. the dvd does not have a mark on it. going to let it cool down.

not having any problems with the disk reading here.

I agree about some of the regular multi - there aren't enough modes IMHO. I do enjoy the co-op though.

co op's where its at

coop wins but i quite like the mp - but if you team sucks you usually go with em

iluvquake4 wrote:Seems what the MP needs is dedicated Linux servers, though I doubt MS would be happy about that.

yes because linux is obviously the only solution

it is to that moron

what the fucked he on about anyway?? the server is the xbox with the biggest pipe.

Dedicated Servers > P2P

yeah but why would MS do that? they won't make anu money from it

Doombrain wrote:what the fucked he on about anyway?? the server is the xbox with the biggest pipe.

Yes, and it's working so great!

works for me. you can't blame MS for your crappy router managment

Doombrain wrote:yeah but why would MS do that? they won't make anu money from it

Client pays for game Connects to Dedicated Server

iluvquake4 wrote:

Doombrain wrote:yeah but why would MS do that? they won't make anu money from it

Client pays for game Connects to Dedicated Server

overheads you idiot

Client runs Linux servers / Cost To MS = Zero

iluvquake4 wrote:Client runs Linux servers / Cost To MS = Zero

lol you just don't get it do you

It's difficult to translate "retard" to English. Your posts are incoherent.

Doombrain wrote:The MP is so fucking inconstant it's gay.

P2P

iluvquake4 wrote:Client runs Linux servers / Cost To MS = Zero

cost of admins? (Linux doesn't just magically fucking work douche)
cost of hardware?
cost of bandwidth?
cost of power?

what the fuck are you talking about?

iluvquake4 wrote:It's difficult to translate "retard" to English. Your posts are incoherent.

Lol some little prick sat in his bedroom schooling a company that more or less started computing and networking today as we know it.
But don’t worry! iluvquake4 has all the solutions for your network issue because it seems Microsoft can’t design the perfect gaming network that works with all manner of routers at no cost or which has no commercial value. Thanks kid, lets have it!

iluvcock4, not only are you a prick, you're starting to give me a headache.

*adds to my ignore list*

reefsurfer wrote:

Doombrain wrote:I’m about to sell my copy. Well pissed off with MP. I just played someone and didn't win one game and I know I’ll play later and win them all. The MP is so fucking inconstant it's gay.

owned!

Keep trying.

And if you need to see owned, I can refer you to an example.

Games Using Dedicated Servers:

http://archive.gamespy.com/stats/

Clans pay for servers, admin servers, etc.

Welcome to the Internet.

iluvquake4 wrote:
Clans pay for servers, admin servers, etc.

lol, cost = zero

moron

iluvquake4 wrote:Client runs Linux servers / Cost To MS = Zero

Jesus christ you moron - you think OS cost is the only overhead to having enough dedicated servers to handle the entire LIVE community?

And how much would we have to increase LIVE fees to handle the increased cost to M$?

hahahaha

can we keep this about gow and ditch Uncle's favorite toy?

this will work

Players could run the dedicated server software on their PCs, or rented PCs, or from game server hosts.

Live could list the dedicated servers. Players can join the servers.

You can run a dedicated server and list it, or join a P2P session (just like now).

It would be no different than how it's done for all the online PC games such as Quake 3, Enemy Territory, Quake 4, etc, etc.

:icon27: