Quake3World

riddla wrote:They wouldn't be able to stop it.

Like they can't stop Church/State separation?

seremtan wrote:all this talk of 'proving' a theory correct is wrong.

I've been over this ground on more than one occasion with Fiddla, and it won't sink in. He'll keep misdiagnosing the issue and repeating himself until you either lapse into unconsciousness or pull your hair out.

Like I said, he reverts into Kracus in this discussion with his ability to miss the issue at hand.

Perhaps it's his way of paying homage to Kracus in his absence...I dunno.

Perhaps it's his refusal to own up to a solid opinion or stance on the issue, and obfuscating around it by pointing out the things that people don't know.

riddla wrote:Bad command or file name.

Ahh, it all makes sense to me now.

LOL

riddla wrote:or maybe its more of the fact that I'm speaking to the very heart of this whole debacle and you guys are stuck on your own little bandwagon.

riddla - the heart of the issue is which theory should be taught in a science classroom.

That's it.

riddla wrote:or maybe its more of the fact that I'm speaking to the very heart of this whole debacle and you guys are stuck on your own little bandwagon.

You're not speaking to the heart of anything except a question that has never been answered and likely never will.

That is not the heart of this issue at all. You just refuse to recognize it.

And why should we teach any theory in a science classroom Kracus?

Are you talking to me, or did Kracus pull a drive-by?

R00k wrote:Are you talking to me, or did Kracus pull a drive-by?

No not you...the new Kracus.

Just checking.

You're discussing your own topic, you stooge.

The thread isn't about arguing whether god made us or we evolved -- we've done that a thousand times here.

That's what you're doing now -- but you're still in the bitching phase.

You haven't jumped to the heart of anything. You've missed the entire point.

I'm not sure what in the world made me think you were intelligent at one time, but I'm glad my illusions have been dispelled.

riddla wrote:Until you can prove either without a doubt it doesnt matter what you teach kids because the simple fact remains that we dont really know either way.

that's just stupid.

Science would be worthless if it taught young children in school that Zeus could have created the universe with a lightning bolt. Would it not?

We don't know that Zues isn't on his mighty throne right now casting lightning bolts down on the Earth during electrical storms, so I think I am going to start teaching that when discussing weather.

Good call. There's no way to prove otherwise, so both theories should be given equal teaching time. :icon14:

R00k wrote:Good call. There's no way to prove otherwise, so both theories should be given equal teaching time. :icon14:

Hey, I can tell when you're being sarcastic and badmouthing Zeus. Zeus is the only reasonable theory out there for explaining lightning. The logic is simple... When I drink a cup of water, am I afraid of being electrocuted? NO! Lightning can't come from water, it could only be caused by a supernatural force.... Zeus.

ID is waaayy cool. riddla should teach it!

history?

oh dear, the old page 4 is missing.... I do believe Riddla died on that page.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA................
AAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa