Now Bill Frist is on the teach ID bandwagon

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:44 pm

riddla wrote:They wouldn't be able to stop it.

Like they can't stop Church/State separation?

Post by **Hannibal** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:03 pm

seremtan wrote:all this talk of 'proving' a theory correct is wrong.

I've been over this ground on more than one occasion with Fiddla, and it won't sink in. He'll keep misdiagnosing the issue and repeating himself until you either lapse into unconsciousness or pull your hair out.

Post by **tnf** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:04 pm

Like I said, he reverts into Kracus in this discussion with his ability to miss the issue at hand.

Perhaps it's his way of paying homage to Kracus in his absence...I dunno.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:15 pm

Perhaps it's his refusal to own up to a solid opinion or stance on the issue, and obfuscating around it by pointing out the things that people don't know.

Post by **Hannibal** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:32 pm

riddla wrote:Bad command or file name.

Ahh, it all makes sense to me now.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:38 pm

Post by **tnf** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:39 pm

riddla wrote:or maybe its more of the fact that I'm speaking to the very heart of this whole debacle and you guys are stuck on your own little bandwagon.

riddla - the heart of the issue is which theory should be taught in a science classroom.

That's it.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:39 pm

riddla wrote:or maybe its more of the fact that I'm speaking to the very heart of this whole debacle and you guys are stuck on your own little bandwagon.

You're not speaking to the heart of anything except a question that has never been answered and likely never will.

That is not the heart of this issue at all. You just refuse to recognize it.

Post by **tnf** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:40 pm

And why should we teach any theory in a science classroom Kracus?

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:45 pm

Are you talking to me, or did Kracus pull a drive-by?

Post by **tnf** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:55 pm

R00k wrote:Are you talking to me, or did Kracus pull a drive-by?

No not you...the new Kracus.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:00 pm

Just checking.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:36 pm

You're discussing your own topic, you stooge.

The thread isn't about arguing whether god made us or we evolved -- we've done that a thousand times here.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:44 pm

That's what you're doing now -- but you're still in the bitching phase.

You haven't jumped to the heart of anything. You've missed the entire point.

Post by **R00k** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:08 pm

I'm not sure what in the world made me think you were intelligent at one time, but I'm glad my illusions have been dispelled.

Post by **4days** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:33 pm

riddla wrote:Until you can prove either without a doubt it doesnt matter what you teach kids because the simple fact remains that we dont really know either way.

that's just stupid.

Post by **Kills On Site** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:41 pm

True, we don't know. Nobody truly knows, but evolution has a lot of evidence, mostly indirect. Now we only touched on evolution as a source of life, we mainly did evolution from being to being, of course doesn't the Bible say like we are only 45,000 years old as an earth, something like that. The problem is that you can't really give any evidence or indirect evidence for ID. Hell if what all I'm hearing in my Physics class is right we don't truly understand electricity either. I think this will be quite a debate, but I would like to point out that evolution started with Darwin and the other guy, I forget his name, but that happened around in the 1800s and went through tons of crap by many people and has been reserched since and I believe it was first taught in pubic school in the 1970s, at least in the US. It is too early of a "theory" to be taught in public schools, needs more time.

Post by **R00k** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:10 am

Science would be worthless if it taught young children in school that Zeus could have created the universe with a lightning bolt. Would it not?

Post by **tnf** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:10 am

We don't know that Zues isn't on his mighty throne right now casting lightning bolts down on the Earth during electrical storms, so I think I am going to start teaching that when discussing weather.

Post by **R00k** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:22 am

Good call. There's no way to prove otherwise, so both theories should be given equal teaching time. :icon14:

Post by **mjrpes** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:37 am

R00k wrote:Good call. There's no way to prove otherwise, so both theories should be given equal teaching time. :icon14:

Hey, I can tell when you're being sarcastic and badmouthing Zeus. Zeus is the only reasonable theory out there for explaining lightning. The logic is simple... When I drink a cup of water, am I afraid of being electrocuted? NO! Lightning can't come from water, it could only be caused by a supernatural force.... Zeus.

Post by **prince1000** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:34 am

ID is waaayy cool. riddla should teach it!

Post by **prince1000** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:38 am

history?

Post by **Hannibal** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:58 am

oh dear, the old page 4 is missing.... I do believe Riddla died on that page.

Post by **Foo** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:13 am

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA................
AAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa