Minumum response time on LCDs for gaming

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

2001FP - Standard dimensions
2005FPW - Widescreen
Dek
Posts: 1010
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 5:53 pm

Post by Dek »

Psyche911 wrote:2001FP - Standard dimensions
2005FPW - Widescreen

2005FPW - Widescreen

it's nice but it's like 20' widescreen meaning it's no taller height wise (screen real estate) then a 17 standard inch monitor, you just gain an inch or two on both sides..

since the diagnol point from one side to the other is wider instead of a 45 degree angle it's about 30 degrees.
Last edited by Dek on Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Dek wrote:
Psyche911 wrote:2001FP - Standard dimensions
2005FPW - Widescreen

2005FPW - Widescreen

it's nice but it's like 20' widescreen meaning it's no taller height wise then a 17 inch monitor, you just gain an inch or two on both sides..
It's also better equipped to handle dvd viewing.. instead of big ass bars on the top and bottom, you get to use almost the entire screen
Dek
Posts: 1010
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 5:53 pm

Post by Dek »

Dave wrote:
Dek wrote:
Psyche911 wrote:2001FP - Standard dimensions
2005FPW - Widescreen

2005FPW - Widescreen

it's nice but it's like 20' widescreen meaning it's no taller height wise then a 17 inch monitor, you just gain an inch or two on both sides..
It's also better equipped to handle dvd viewing.. instead of big ass bars on the top and bottom, you get to use almost the entire screen
if the dvd is anamorphic.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Oh and I've personally sent back 7 1905s, 3 1705s (i think, it was the curren 17") and 1 2001s.. dell's 4:3 quality is fucking terrible, especially since they send you a refurbished screen
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Dek wrote:
Dave wrote:
Dek wrote:
2005FPW - Widescreen

it's nice but it's like 20' widescreen meaning it's no taller height wise then a 17 inch monitor, you just gain an inch or two on both sides..
It's also better equipped to handle dvd viewing.. instead of big ass bars on the top and bottom, you get to use almost the entire screen
if the dvd is anamorphic.
I said almost all of it.. you get a .5" bar instead of a 1.5" bar
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Dave wrote:Get a Dell tnf.. if you get a coupon (which pop up all the time) I think you can get a 20" widescreen for about $400
I don't know about a 20 inch dell for 400. Here is their 2100FP. $749.00 - I don't see them dropping it over $300.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

tnf wrote:
Dave wrote:Get a Dell tnf.. if you get a coupon (which pop up all the time) I think you can get a 20" widescreen for about $400
I don't know about a 20 inch dell for 400. Here is their 2100FP. $749.00 - I don't see them dropping it over $300.
You obviously aren't familiar with dell coupons ;)
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:didn't Sony release an OLED Clie in the fourth quarter last year?
clie doen be gone like yesterday :tear:

last year even too :wah:

i really really liked them side scrool wheel
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Dek wrote:
Dave wrote:
Dek wrote:
2005FPW - Widescreen

it's nice but it's like 20' widescreen meaning it's no taller height wise then a 17 inch monitor, you just gain an inch or two on both sides..
It's also better equipped to handle dvd viewing.. instead of big ass bars on the top and bottom, you get to use almost the entire screen
if the dvd is anamorphic.
i don't know of any current titles that are not anamorphic. sure, early titles aren't, but most of those that are worth a crap have been re-released anamorphic and more often than not, "special" editions.

even if the dvd is NOT anamorphic, you get some vertical stretch which can easily be remedied using the zoom feature.
Cooldown
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Cooldown »

tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Maybe I'll get this sony - it's a bit pricey, but there is a 100 dollar rebate that would make it 499.

http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?lev ... Technology

comes with a DVI cable too - i've noticed that some don't...saw it today - i really like the xbrite feature - some folks don't though.
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by YourGrandpa »

I have the Samsung 213T, it's a 25ms LCD and I game on it just fine. But if you've got the cash and want the best, buy the one with the lowest "ms". Nothing higer than 16ms would be my advice. Though you're going to have trouble finding LCDs larger than 19" without breaking the bank.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Well - I ended up going with a Sony with the XBRITE feature. It's personal preference, but I really like how bright and vivid it makes the colors.

Now I am driving myself nuts trying to get the settings exactly how I want them.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

It's an 8ms response time. I went with a 17 inch one. I didn't want to spend much more than this one was, and the smaller size is a good fit for my cramped desk.
Post Reply