Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:03 pm
StormShadow wrote:
Your world is waiting...
https://quake3world.com/forum/
StormShadow wrote:
Ha - Try 6'5" with a 31" waist.seremtan wrote:seems like most off-the-peg trousers are made for short fat people, even in the uk. it's a mini-nightmare trying to find trousers when you're 6'4" with a 36" waist - either they have the style/colour i want but not the size, or the other way around. it was even worse when i was younger with a smaller waistDr_Watson wrote:I have a 31 inch waist... and i had to goto FIVE stores to find a new belt... friggin porkies.
most places the smallest belt is 34"
why on earth would you buy them then?Canis wrote:I have some 36" shorts, because they were the only things on the shelf when I bought them. I'm a 31-32"....fucking irritating.
:icon27: :icon27: :icon27: :icon27: :icon27: :icon27: :icon27: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23:hate wrote:<img src="http://www.emmyonline.org/emmy_images/daytime30/1.jpg">
your .gifs are too big and over the 500k limit. Please remove.ToxicBug wrote:Yeah, today I went shopping for shorts and the smallest I could find was 34, I'm 32-33 depending on the brand of clothes. It fit pretty comfy though.
I'll agree with that.Grudge wrote:plus, they're fucking useless
if only we had a thumbnail tag+JuggerNaut+ wrote:your .gifs are too big and over the 500k limit. Please remove.ToxicBug wrote:Yeah, today I went shopping for shorts and the smallest I could find was 34, I'm 32-33 depending on the brand of clothes. It fit pretty comfy though.
Thanks,
Management.
or perhaps...MKJ wrote:if only we had a thumbnail tag+JuggerNaut+ wrote:your .gifs are too big and over the 500k limit. Please remove.ToxicBug wrote:Yeah, today I went shopping for shorts and the smallest I could find was 34, I'm 32-33 depending on the brand of clothes. It fit pretty comfy though.
Thanks,
Management.