Loose Change: chilling 911 documentary!

Post by **Coreiel** » Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:39 pm

that didnt make any sense i am sure. just as yours didnt really make any sense to me.

Post by **Coreiel** » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:29 pm

wow. failed yet again

Post by **Coreiel** » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:29 pm

and for eveyone that missed what duhard did, he posted a link to a picture and fucked it up. for that post deleting faggot.

http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wanker.bmp

Post by **The HavoX** » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:31 pm

Not Found

The requested URL /gira0024/wanker.bmp was not found on this server.

Post by **Duhard** » Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:31 pm

Coreiel wrote:and for eveyone that missed what duhard did, he posted a link to a picture and fucked it up. for that post deleting faggot.

http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wanker.bmp

Thanks for the heads up...here's the deal wanker...

...suck on this.

Post by **[xeno]Julios** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 6:04 am

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/ar ... /27302.htm

Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'
Highly recognized former chief economist in Labor Department now doubts official 9/11 story, claiming suspicious facts and evidence cover-up indicate government foul play and possible criminal implications.
June 12, 2005

Post by **Geebs** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:01 am

Freakaloin wrote:hmm...he saw the first plane hit the tower on tv? thats weird...video of the first tower impact wasn't shown until later that day or the next...not anytime close to the attacks...

Bollocks. It was on the BBC.

Post by **4days** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:58 am

Geebs wrote:
Freakaloin wrote:hmm...he saw the first plane hit the tower on tv? thats weird...video of the first tower impact wasn't shown until later that day or the next...not anytime close to the attacks...
Bollocks. It was on the BBC.

aye, i remember that - they were about to show VT of the first plane when the second one hit - but didn't 'power of nightmares' show that bush was in the classroom as it all happened?

geoff, have you got the 'power of nightmares' series? makes for much better viewing than that tinfoil clad idiot who talks like a WWF challenger.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:13 pm

the first crash wasn't shown until after 6 pm est on television...morons...

Post by **R00k** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:34 pm

That's true. They didn't have footage of the first crash until they found somebody on the street who had recorded it.

Post by **R00k** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:34 pm

[xeno]Julios wrote:http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/ar ... /27302.htm

Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'
Highly recognized former chief economist in Labor Department now doubts official 9/11 story, claiming suspicious facts and evidence cover-up indicate government foul play and possible criminal implications.
June 12, 2005

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6170

Post by **plained** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:35 pm

i dislike loose change very much.

i dont like bills iether.

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:07 pm

and this happened cuz of fires on 2 floors and a diesel fuel tank...lol...how perfect...

http://thunderbay.indymedia.org/uploads/wtc7-divx3.avi

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:11 pm

look at this...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... n.nj.1.wmv

now look at it zoomed...why would that happen at the base of the tower, if the collapse began way up there? oh wait...its obvious...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... _smoke.wmv

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:29 pm

what exactly is obvious?
i mean you always post a link or summat with some insinuation, yet you never give an actual theory or anything

only stuff like "any question? its so obvious, if you believe your govt youre a moron".
tell us, in detail, what exactly is 'so obvious'? what really happened?
lets hear it

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:41 pm

smoke flying up 15 stories high at the base of tower...its obvious explosives were used...r u really that stoopid?

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:46 pm

im not that stoopid, im just wondering what it is that youre always trying to prove. you never post more than 3 words to 'make your point'. give as un extensive essay on what you think (or know, or think to know) what went on. without the trailing sentences and 'rofl obvious'

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:48 pm

why? u too stoopid? obviously...

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:51 pm

no, cause you never have anything else to say but "rofl moron its so obvious".

but i see youre a brick wall. so much for credibility :icon14:

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:53 pm

this has nothing to do with me...but

when the facts are against you argue the logic...when the logic is against you argue the facts...when both the facts and logic are against you, call the opposition bad names.

obviously...thats all u know...good try no0b...

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:54 pm

i dont argue anything, im just wondering. old skool curiousity

and i never called anyone bad names

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:58 pm

CRUSHED again as usual...

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:59 pm

i see when logic, facts and reason are against you you just stop making sense

:icon14:

Post by **Freakaloin** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:04 pm

whats logic, facts or reason is against me? explain moron...

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:09 pm

lol.. its obvious... unless youre a moron.. CRUSHED...