LOL. i've just been given one of these

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

*golf clap*
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

I said good luck with the damper wires.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

it works fine thanks.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

whoa this display kicks ass yo
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

Nice one man. I've been using a black NEC MultiSync FE950+ and it's the shit. Very crisp and vivid.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

shaft wrote:
Pauly wrote:I still prefer CRT over TFT for gaming anyway
Yeah definantly.
Although has anyone tried those new 9ms LCD's?
Generally speaking, the improvements are all about PR: like, the time quoted for the exact same display is 9 ms for a Dell monitor and 11 ms for a Cinema Display, basically because Dell are liars.

No ghosting here.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

eepberries wrote:Lol you fags with your expensive thin monitors. HAY I SPENT 300 DOLLARS ON A MONITOR SO NOW I CAN LAUGH AT IDIOTS WHO BUY CRTS THAT DO THE EXACT SAME SHIT FOR LESS THAN HALF THE PRICE. I'M SO MUCH SMARTER THAN THEM. RITE? RITE?

I pay half as much for a monitor that does the same thing as yours :icon26:
Hmm. Lightweight, greatly reduced desk usage, one third the power consumption size-for-size, easier on the eyes.

TFTs have no advantages over CRT! You're right! And not as some might thing, a complete fucking idiot.

lol.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Post Reply