Page 3 of 15
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:57 pm
by Lieutenant Dan
Sadly, who would step up to take her place if she was charged? Gotta keep the wheels movin'
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:59 pm
by xer0s
Bernie supporters were chomping at the bit. Honestly, I would have been fine with that...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 5:10 pm
by Eraser
Ryoki wrote:Disappointing but not surprising.
'Nuff said
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 2:44 pm
by xer0s
Holy shit, FBI director Comey is getting slaughtered at this House hearing...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 4:12 pm
by seremtan
in america, you can shoot the messenger with a real gun!
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:37 am
by losCHUNK
If only it was Sparta
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:39 am
by losCHUNK
xer0s wrote:Holy shit, FBI director Comey is getting slaughtered at this House hearing...
So what's his story ?, she was too rich or too president ?
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:55 am
by Ferrao10
Hypothetically, if she would have been charged and pushed out of of Pres-run, what's the law in the US?
Would Bernie have gotten a step-in or how'd be the etiquette?
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 3:11 am
by coltonquake3
Bump because I knew this thread was just as relevant as Trump's.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:33 am
by losCHUNK
How the fuck did Bill put up with that ?.
Guy deserves a medal.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:35 pm
by seremtan
Ferrao10 wrote:Hypothetically, if she would have been charged and pushed out of of Pres-run, what's the law in the US?
Would Bernie have gotten a step-in or how'd be the etiquette?
most likely they'd say: fuck the primaries, here's Biden
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:13 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:43 pm
by Transient
Another revelation that comes as a surprise to nobody. It's still satisfying to catch Debbie Wasserman Schultz in a lie, though.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:37 pm
by xer0s
lol
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:41 pm
by xer0s
But seriously, what will it take for the people to say, enough is enough?
I really think it's the media's fault (again). They fail to explain to the public what exactly is going on. All they do is ask talking heads "What do you think about the DNC emails?" But they fail to explain to the public what exactly is going on. They assume the average Joe has time to browse Reddit and news sites all day. The average person has a job, kids, and they're own problems. They don't have time to sit and read about the details of the leaks. So they'll just continue to blindly follow Clinton. Fuck the media...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 6:04 pm
by Captain
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 7:29 pm
by xer0s
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:36 pm
by losCHUNK
You can only blame the media for so much.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:43 pm
by seremtan
^ this
people want to be spoon-fed The Truthâ„¢ by some source they can trust unquestioningly, and don't understand that it doesn't work like that
and so the long decade wears on...
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:18 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Stuff like this is good in that it helps more people see how compromised media is.
Hard to understate how bad in many other ways it is though.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 1:04 pm
by John^Rocker
Why dont we just elect the media.. so its not a totalitarian state, then, it will be a democracy.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:49 pm
by losCHUNK
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:Stuff like this is good in that it helps more people see how compromised media is.
Hard to understate how bad in many other ways it is though.
Not saying it's bad but it comes back to my point that I made before with people just not caring enough. Everyone knows the media is bias and everyone knows there's ways to get a better informed opinion but that doesn;t happen. Ultimately the responsibility resides with us and unfortunately we just can't be arsed enough to look into it. I think people have a well formed narrative in their head anyway and when the media mention something that reinforces that narrative it becomes a confirmation bias, imo anyway.
In cases of things like the Murdoch empire I actually think it's the media playing up to public opinion rather than vice versa.
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:04 pm
by losCHUNK
[lvlshot]http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/50520ade6bb3f7ef2c000012/the-sun-hillsborough.jpg[/lvlshot]
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:26 pm
by Eraser
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Resigns As Democratic Party Chair
The Florida congresswoman had faced calls to resign for months, after Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and his supporters accused her of rigging the Democratic primaries against him.
[/quote]
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57950 ... mg00000063
Re: President Clinton
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:17 pm
by seremtan
Memphis wrote:seremtan wrote:
people want to be spoon-fed The Truthâ„¢
Truthâ„¢ is relative.
[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/ANYAZoy.jpg[/lvlshot]
what does this image mean?