Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:11 am
by +JuggerNaut+
dmmh wrote:thanks for proving my point
this is not my opinion lol, its just what a study has shown
lol @ all the ppl falling over this
yes you're right. a "study" that so far, doesn't exist. i don't think you're lying, but i DO believe that you are taking that study as accurate and are indeed agreeing with it.
lol @ you
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:03 am
by 4days
riddla wrote:when the techno world tries to say techno isnt techno its funny as shit :lol:
could you just shut up please.
not chiming in on anyone's side, but regardless of what dmmh says - you clearly have no fucking idea what you're talking about.
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:42 pm
by Testoclesius
piddla keeps on pissing all over himself then rolling around in the puddle :lol:
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:26 pm
by Chupacabra
dmmh wrote:good computer music is artistically more complicated to make then classical music....
I READ IT ON THE INTERNET...IT MUST BE TRUE
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:30 pm
by duffman91
dmmh wrote:techno is just a house style, not the collective for all computer music.
americans dont know dick about house music, even though it started in Detroit/ Chicago
Much like how you don't know anything about music composition. :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19:
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:26 pm
by dmmh
and you do aight?
nuff said
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 10:33 pm
by sys0p
dmmh wrote:and you do aight?
nuff said
whoa, you just totally shattered his credibility. nuff said!