Page 3 of 3
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:19 am
by +JuggerNaut+
better? no, but they easily measure up, even to plasma. dlp rptv is bigger of course, and some people just NEED that extra 1.5 feet of space behind their sets, but they're the best bang for a buck, imo.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:38 am
by R00k
I'm buying a thick entertainment center soon too, so I don't really care about the depth too much. As long as the picture quality is beautiful from a large viewing angle, and it will stay that way for a long time, then I will be happy.
The DLPs are quite a bit cheaper than LCDs, so it makes me nervous. And I haven't seen any of them in the brick-and-mortar stores, so I don't have much of a comparison -- although I may have seen one and just not known what I was looking at.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:39 am
by cumpooter
42 inch is small after short time
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:42 am
by cumpooter
R00k wrote:I'm buying a thick entertainment center soon too, so I don't really care about the depth too much. As long as the picture quality is beautiful from a large viewing angle, and it will stay that way for a long time, then I will be happy.
The DLPs are quite a bit cheaper than LCDs, so it makes me nervous. And I haven't seen any of them in the brick-and-mortar stores, so I don't have much of a comparison -- although I may have seen one and just not known what I was looking at.
dude
rear projxn suk
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:53 am
by +JuggerNaut+
noob.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:56 am
by R00k
cumpooter wrote:R00k wrote:I'm buying a thick entertainment center soon too, so I don't really care about the depth too much. As long as the picture quality is beautiful from a large viewing angle, and it will stay that way for a long time, then I will be happy.
The DLPs are quite a bit cheaper than LCDs, so it makes me nervous. And I haven't seen any of them in the brick-and-mortar stores, so I don't have much of a comparison -- although I may have seen one and just not known what I was looking at.
dude
rear projxn suk
why
do you say
that?
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:56 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
i'm thinking one of those new hd projectors that gives a 15 ft image
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:20 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:11 am
by LawL
There's really not that much difference between LCD and Plasma. Depends on the quality of both for the price you're prepared to pay. Personal preference really.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:28 am
by +JuggerNaut+
in black levels, yes there is.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:30 am
by LawL
Apple.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:46 am
by Dark Metal
Law wrote:Apple.
Is this your new theme?
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:53 am
by LawL
It's just one I'm considering, I'm not totally sold on it yet.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:56 am
by Dark Metal
Just asking as it's not the first time I've seen you reccomend the Apple recently...
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:46 am
by MKJ
R00k wrote:cumpooter wrote:R00k wrote:I'm buying a thick entertainment center soon too, so I don't really care about the depth too much. As long as the picture quality is beautiful from a large viewing angle, and it will stay that way for a long time, then I will be happy.
The DLPs are quite a bit cheaper than LCDs, so it makes me nervous. And I haven't seen any of them in the brick-and-mortar stores, so I don't have much of a comparison -- although I may have seen one and just not known what I was looking at.
dude
rear projxn suk
why
do you say
that?
cause he has no idea what he's talking aboot
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:00 pm
by Doombrain
not going to bother now. i'm going to wait because the price is dropping so fast there has to be the nex gen coming soon, or some other shit innit somat or nathin
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:23 pm
by R00k
is that your answer to my question then?
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:54 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
i wouldn't worry about it unless you plan on moving 23 times in the next 2 years.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:00 pm
by cumpooter
oh christ
edit fags
it's me hate
fucking cunts
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:23 pm
by R00k
i knew it was you
you still haven't given me
a decent answer
homo
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:31 pm
by Doombrain
R00k wrote:I'm buying a thick entertainment center soon too, so I don't really care about the depth too much. As long as the picture quality is beautiful from a large viewing angle, and it will stay that way for a long time, then I will be happy.
The DLPs are quite a bit cheaper than LCDs, so it makes me nervous. And I haven't seen any of them in the brick-and-mortar stores, so I don't have much of a comparison -- although I may have seen one and just not known what I was looking at.
dlp's are prone to dead pixels because of the amount of moving parts. qul wise, they can be about the same
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:36 pm
by Fender
What's the deal with Sony's new SXRD (Silicon X-tal (Crystal) Reflective Display) technology? Sounds like another name for (more advanced?) LCD (or maybe LCoS?)
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:50 pm
by plained
they are 3 chip desighn with the highest pixel density and a 94% aperture ratio.
theyre 1080 p truly with 2 mil pixel count
so theyre prolly real good
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:24 pm
by shaft
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:55 pm
by Fender