north korea....

Post by **Freakaloin** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:23 pm

nothing is gonna happen to n korea...did u notice when bush spoke about this yesterday he mentioned iran in his speech more times than korea?...and the eisenhower carrier group was sent to the gulf on october 2nd and is due to arrive there on the 21st...right before the elections...uh huh...i can see where this is heading...

Post by **seremtan** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:33 pm

Underpants? wrote:oh I can't wait to see someone like john heder replace alan alda as a cross-dressing shit beard!

klinger was jamie farr ffs. alan alda was hawkeye pierce

dumb yank

Post by **MKJ** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:34 pm

seremtan wrote:
Underpants? wrote:oh I can't wait to see someone like john heder replace alan alda as a cross-dressing shit beard!
klinger was jamie farr ffs. alan alda was hawkeye pierce

dumb yank

:icon32: didnt want to spoil his fun

Post by **Ryoki** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:47 pm

Freakaloin wrote:nothing is gonna happen to n korea...did u notice when bush spoke about this yesterday he mentioned iran in his speech more times than korea?...and the eisenhower carrier group was sent to the gulf on october 2nd and is due to arrive there on the 21st...right before the elections...uh huh...i can see where this is heading...

Did you read this one?

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/200 ... pocalypse/

:icon32:

Post by **Underpants?** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:58 pm

MKJ wrote:
seremtan wrote:
Underpants? wrote:oh I can't wait to see someone like john heder replace alan alda as a cross-dressing shit beard!
klinger was jamie farr ffs. alan alda was hawkeye pierce

dumb yank
:icon32: didnt want to spoil his fun

if that's not cross-dressing, what would you call it, you filthy fucking dick holes--cross-contamination?

Post by **Underpants?** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:02 pm

p.s. that pic also really illustrates the dirty dirty on his upper lip. :icon14:

Post by **MKJ** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:04 pm

bj got half a cat on his lip. noone fucks with the eye of the hawk :icon33:

Post by **Tsakali_** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:11 pm

the intro song on that gay show always made my smirk

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:45 pm

one of the best t.v. shows evah!

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:53 pm

maybe the North Koreans could revitalize their economy by selling nukes. There has got to be a huge market.

Post by **seremtan** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:27 pm

yeah, on eBay. we are in the run-up to Christmas after all, and nothing blows the smile off a child's face like his (or her) very own nuke

Post by **Captain** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:35 pm

Washington should be the most silent when it comes to nuclear testing and North Korea. Are the States in any position to declare who can have nuclear weapons? India, Pakistan, Israel, United States. Are they in any position to declare who can't? North Korea, Iran. Waste of words when you're sitting on top of a pile of nuclear warheads.

Post by **stocktroll** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:04 pm

how about stfu and go get some new material than the same old recycled anti-usa bs. The USA and USSR were mutually forced in an arms race in the cold war. While there are efforts to decrease the number of nukes it doesnt really do much, like it will make a difference if we had 1000 nukes instead of 2000 nukes. And talks of complete disarment is the dumbest thing ever since nobody can realistically disarm considering you never know if countries still keep their nukes or bad guys (like korea) get them. Nukes as they stand right now can be seen as a good thing as it neutralizes the worlds biggest powers to never want to have war with each other. So instead they try their best to keep diplomatic relations. If it wasnt for nukes there prolly would have already been a WW3 of USA vs USSR.
And the most ironic thing is the USA would actually bennefit the most if nobody in the world had nukes. Their superior conventional military technology is no match for any other nation at the moment. Nukes even up the playing field because its much easier to get some nukes that can hit USA than trying to stay toe to toe with the USA in aviation, subs, cruise missles, aircraft carriers.

Post by **Foo** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:07 pm

Didn't say 'gay' once. Must be upset.

Post by **stocktroll** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:28 pm

i meant to say stfu homo but oh well
but i am pissed this dumb porno im watching is one of those pos asf files where you cant seek ahead to this good scene i want to seen and it crashed 1 hour in

another thing i forgot to add:
the difference between the USA having nukes and North Korea or Iran having nukes is so huge it makes you a complete idiot to try to bring it up as if it means something
say what you want about the US but they are very responsible about nukes and know the consequences of nuclear war as much as anyone else can and will do as much as possible to prevent it (they know avg americans dont want to be nuked)
and i know some wise crack homo will always bring up hiroshima and nagasaki but thats like bringing up the holocaust from germany or japans abuse of the chinese around the same time: it has no reflection on those states right now and just makes you an idiot bringing it up

Post by **Foo** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:45 pm

VLC can skip through asf files.

forTheWin?

Post by **Pooinyourmouth** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:01 pm

ek wrote:upset my ball sack

Then explain why China is calling for the UN to take action on NK? Did you even read any of the articles?

Post by **Captain** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:32 pm

stocktroll wrote:And the most ironic thing is the USA would actually bennefit the most if nobody in the world had nukes. Their superior conventional military technology is no match for any other nation at the moment. Nukes even up the playing field because its much easier to get some nukes that can hit USA than trying to stay toe to toe with the USA in aviation, subs, cruise missles, aircraft carriers.

Post by **Tsakali_** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:32 pm

Captain Mazda wrote:
stocktroll wrote:And the most ironic thing is the USA would actually bennefit the most if nobody in the world had nukes. Their superior conventional military technology is no match for any other nation at the moment. Nukes even up the playing field because its much easier to get some nukes that can hit USA than trying to stay toe to toe with the USA in aviation, subs, cruise missles, aircraft carriers.

where's teh funny?

Post by **Captain** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:53 pm

The ignorance. "Superior conventional military technology"?

Post by **stocktroll** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:07 pm

ignorance lol?
please stop trying to act like you know something im light years ahead of you on this subject

Post by **R00k** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:13 pm

Tsakali_ wrote:the intro song on that gay show always made my smirk

Suicide is Grand?

Post by **losCHUNK** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:15 pm

stocktroll wrote:ignorance lol?
please stop trying to act like you know something im light years ahead of you on this subject

how ignorant

Post by **R00k** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:16 pm

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
R00k wrote:Maybe they are bullshitting.
they could have faked the seismic readings by having everyone in the country jump up and down at the same time.

No reason to get snippy, I was being sarcastic replying to Foo.

Besides, even if they were trying to bluff, they could produce a half-kiloton explosion with conventional weapons couldn't they? I don't recall specifying a unified people-hop.

Post by ek » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:29 pm

Captain Mazda wrote:The ignorance. "Superior conventional military technology"?

lol they are you spastic, grow some pubes then get into politics