Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:49 pm
wow. leftfield. look forward to meeting you in newport sometime. you can express your views to me face to face.
I think the camera makes them pretty but the photos themselves are uninteresting.Dave wrote:I think doombrain's photos are pretty :lub:
yeah, i've made a real point in following you're personal life.Memphis wrote:I haven't drank in over 8 monthsDoombrain wrote: na, it's nothing man. He's just prolly finished drinking all the beer in wales, because he drinks, incase you didn't know
Incase you didn't know
I noticed it, only reason I started saying I thought the pics were crap to begin withMemphis wrote:Lol anyway. Nice to see who's got the defensive streak here when they're not even the topic of conversation. Or was that the problem from the beginning?.
Nah dude just using the opportunity as I saw it arise.Memphis wrote:You dare side with me AssKrac :icon6:
I dig alone
Because you said so, retard.Memphis wrote:Why do you ask?
What's your problem anyway?Memphis wrote:There's enough people out there snapping any old shit with a decent cam and calling it gold.
Why are you shitting on this thread?Memphis wrote:That's a very open question.
Please be more specific.
No, you were being a dick.Memphis wrote:I didn't shit on this thread at all. I'm trying to encourage some more inventive work from some people who claim to have a passion in the subject. Now if people can't take constructive criticism from their target audience then the problem is far from being mine...
What the hell are you on about?Memphis wrote:What's a 'stealth edit' anyway? It blatently says 'edited by Memphis'.
Are you trying to accuse underhand tactics on me now? Does that mean you think you've lost too?
:icon23: :icon22:Foo wrote:Mephis is right. Tight focused shots on dull shit are about on par with grayscaled pics and myspace self-shoots which show the camera.
Which I only realised as I thought about comparably tacky shots, are the other photos in your post.
I STILL LOVE YOU LIKE THE SLICKBACK GERMAN BROTHER I NEVER HADSplishSplash wrote::icon23: :icon22:Foo wrote:Mephis is right. Tight focused shots on dull shit are about on par with grayscaled pics and myspace self-shoots which show the camera.
Which I only realised as I thought about comparably tacky shots, are the other photos in your post.
Look, if we all gathered here under the title "Up and Coming Photography Prodigies" you might have a point.Memphis wrote:Explain how.SplishSplash wrote: No, you were being a dick.
written right underneath it, it's pretty obvious nobody needs your patronizing bullshit.SplishSplash wrote:As you can probably tell, it hasn't been that long since I discovered the manual focus on my camera. :icon32:
Because you were being a dick about it. It's not like you made some startling new revelation by saying "Stones are boring." You were simply being a dick.Memphis wrote: So? You admit you're a new starter in the wonderful world of still imagery (twice). So why is bit of criticism so hard to take?
Thanks Memph, but who thought I wasn't?Memphis wrote:See? pete's still your friend! :icon25:pete wrote:I envy you, you take great pics. Went through the posts reading it diagonally and saw some fuck you and a dick But I payed more attention to the pics so that's OK.
Great thread Doombrain. Btw, are you still with this wonderfull woman you posted here last year? I hope so .