Page 3 of 4
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:44 pm
by werldhed
Captain Mazda wrote:R00k wrote:See, when you said your being against the war had nothing to do with Muslims, what you obviously really meant was that the Iraqi War had nothing to do with Muslims.
This is hilariously false in the eyes of Jihadi Joe.
Man, I need to publish an idiot-to-English translation guide, I could make millions!
While you're looking for your own version of an idiot-to-English translation guide, remember this:
Your - possessive; belonging to you
You're - contraction; "you are"
Instead of trying to correct a post that wasn't incorrect to begin with, perhaps you could have answered my inferred question. I am genuinely curious as to what your post meant. Were you agreeing with me?
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:17 am
by seremtan
there's a good piece summing up the iran war buildup insanity by john pilger here -
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11851.htm
if anyone's interested
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:23 am
by Freakaloin
Nightshade wrote:I'm wondering how someone as fucking dumb as he is can operate the internet.
lol...u don't operate the internet u fucking nitwit...
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:37 am
by R00k
Scott Ritter claims he has talked to John Bolton's speechwriter, and they have already written the speech to be given after the Security Council finds no foul play - it says that America can't just sit idly by while Iran threatens us, and we must pre-emptively defend ourselves.
I'm not believing much of anything I'm reading right now - everybody seems to have their own version of how things are about to happen. The thing they all have in common though, is that we are going to attack Iran no matter what. Well, Ritter thinks that if the Dems can take the Congress back in '06 it can be stopped, but I think he's overly optimistic.
Either way, things are definitely gearing up right now. I only wish Fitzgerald would indict Cheney for passing classified info to Libby, and Bush would get impeached over the wiretapping program, quickly.
Bah I'm just rambling.
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:59 am
by Dukester
R00k wrote:and they have already written the speech to be given after the Security Council finds no foul play
really, that statement is a presumptious as the ones made by the people you are criticising.
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:49 am
by seremtan
he's referring to what john bolton's speechwriter is supposed to have said to scott ritter
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:01 am
by R00k
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:04 am
by R00k
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:17 am
by Nightshade
Freakaloin wrote:Nightshade wrote:I'm wondering how someone as fucking dumb as he is can operate the internet.
lol...u don't operate the internet u fucking nitwit...
Jesus Goof, stop being stupid for one post, will you?
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:44 am
by Dukester
seremtan wrote:he's referring to what john bolton's speechwriter is supposed to have said to scott ritter
yep I realize that, but the whole thing smacks of, "This is what is going to happen next, because this is what we want to happen next, because this is what we want to happen next"
"we can't wait till it happens, because we want it to so bad we can taste it"
Somebody is spoiling for a fight. Might be the Bushie administration, might be Iran. The Iranians ain't making any new friends on this one.
Anyway, since publicly the west seems to be on the same side in this instance, it only seems fair to just wait and see what happens, rather than say "When they say Iran is only trying to produce electricity" we will call them liars go to war!
The very same people that you (or generically) {and the majority of this message board) are saying is going to say that Iran only wants peacefull nuclear energy are the same people that are warnimg the
World right now, that Iran wants to build a nuclear warhead. Or at least the current President of Iran wants that.
Or something like that

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:11 am
by Captain
Nightshade wrote:Jesus Goof, stop being stupid for one post, will you?
Go back to Germany, you monkey-faced prick.
In fact, gather your whole shit-of-the-land family and get humping with all the zionists, pig.
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:09 am
by ek
Heh, thanks for that. Read it whilst eating lunch. :icon14:
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:03 am
by busetibi
yea of course he only wants to supply his country with electricity,hes also laying down fibre optic cable so everyone can get high speed porn,
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:17 am
by feedback
R00k wrote:
Scott Ritter claims he has talked to John Bolton's speechwriter, and they have already written the speech to be given after the Security Council finds no foul play - it says that America can't just sit idly by while Iran threatens us, and we must pre-emptively defend ourselves.
I'm not believing much of anything I'm reading right now - everybody seems to have their own version of how things are about to happen. The thing they all have in common though, is that we are going to attack Iran no matter what. Well, Ritter thinks that if the Dems can take the Congress back in '06 it can be stopped, but I think he's overly optimistic.
Either way, things are definitely gearing up right now. I only wish Fitzgerald would indict Cheney for passing classified info to Libby, and Bush would get impeached over the wiretapping program, quickly.
Bah I'm just rambling.
So essentially, fuck.
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:18 am
by feedback
busetibi wrote:yea of course he only wants to supply his country with electricity,hes also laying down fibre optic cable so everyone can get high speed porn,
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
lol fucking hell someone's done a number on you
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:02 am
by lebomb
I hope the US tries the invade Iran. They wont, because Iran would nuke the incoming US troops. BTW, why does every post that bashes Israel gets angry responses that shoot the messenger of the post? I say, fuck Israel, theyre the source of many of these fucking conflicts. My guess is that there are too many powerful influential jews in the US right now, that control most of the media outlets, and lobby in Washington.
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:31 am
by busetibi
feedback wrote:
lol fucking hell someone's done a number on you
i see,
my view differs from your view, so ive had a number done to me.
interesting,
so whats it like in your ivory tower?
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:07 pm
by seremtan
lebomb wrote:I hope the US tries the invade Iran. They wont, because Iran would nuke the incoming US troops.
lol, nuke them with what? goat curry?
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:08 pm
by seremtan
busetibi wrote:yea of course he only wants to supply his country with electricity,hes also laying down fibre optic cable so everyone can get high speed porn,
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
are you clinically mental?
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:30 pm
by busetibi
lebomb wrote:I hope the US tries the invade Iran. They wont, because Iran would nuke the incoming US troops.
what are they going to do?
cast wizard spells?
you fucking idiot :icon27:
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:32 pm
by busetibi
seremtan wrote:
are you clinically mental?
its better than being clinically dead from the neck up
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:57 pm
by seremtan
busetibi wrote:seremtan wrote:
are you clinically mental?
its better than being clinically dead from the neck up
i wouldn't know, chumpenstein
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:50 pm
by Tormentius
lebomb wrote:I hope the US tries the invade Iran.
I'm totally against another US invasion but no country is stupid enough to start slinging nukes (Iran included). Taking that action would just result in every other nuclear power hitting the button and ending life on our little chunk of rock..
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:26 pm
by jester!
Tormentius wrote:lebomb wrote:I hope the US tries the invade Iran.
I'm totally against another US invasion but no country is stupid enough to start slinging nukes (Iran included). Taking that action would just result in every other nuclear power hitting the button and ending life on our little chunk of rock..
I agree until the end. Even if Iran or some other idiot fanatical country did fire off a nuke, they surely wouldnt have the range and power to project the damage world wide. In the end they would fuck themsleves as every country would hammer the offending country and glass the place, but we would be fine up here in Canada. Other then the pollution from the fallout and such floating around the globe...
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:31 pm
by Freakaloin
but u have to admit its fun to watch war on tv...