Instead of trying to correct a post that wasn't incorrect to begin with, perhaps you could have answered my inferred question. I am genuinely curious as to what your post meant. Were you agreeing with me?Captain Mazda wrote:While you're looking for your own version of an idiot-to-English translation guide, remember this:R00k wrote:See, when you said your being against the war had nothing to do with Muslims, what you obviously really meant was that the Iraqi War had nothing to do with Muslims.
This is hilariously false in the eyes of Jihadi Joe.
Man, I need to publish an idiot-to-English translation guide, I could make millions!
Your - possessive; belonging to you
You're - contraction; "you are"
iranian war date has been set!
there's a good piece summing up the iran war buildup insanity by john pilger here -
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11851.htm
if anyone's interested
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11851.htm
if anyone's interested
-
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
Scott Ritter claims he has talked to John Bolton's speechwriter, and they have already written the speech to be given after the Security Council finds no foul play - it says that America can't just sit idly by while Iran threatens us, and we must pre-emptively defend ourselves.seremtan wrote:there's a good piece summing up the iran war buildup insanity by john pilger here -
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11851.htm
if anyone's interested
I'm not believing much of anything I'm reading right now - everybody seems to have their own version of how things are about to happen. The thing they all have in common though, is that we are going to attack Iran no matter what. Well, Ritter thinks that if the Dems can take the Congress back in '06 it can be stopped, but I think he's overly optimistic.
Either way, things are definitely gearing up right now. I only wish Fitzgerald would indict Cheney for passing classified info to Libby, and Bush would get impeached over the wiretapping program, quickly.
Bah I'm just rambling.
Yea, here you go:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11812.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11812.htm
R00k wrote:I only wish Fitzgerald would indict Cheney for passing classified info to Libby

http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweek ... 209nj1.htm#
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/020906J.shtml
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
yep I realize that, but the whole thing smacks of, "This is what is going to happen next, because this is what we want to happen next, because this is what we want to happen next"seremtan wrote:he's referring to what john bolton's speechwriter is supposed to have said to scott ritter
"we can't wait till it happens, because we want it to so bad we can taste it"
Somebody is spoiling for a fight. Might be the Bushie administration, might be Iran. The Iranians ain't making any new friends on this one.
Anyway, since publicly the west seems to be on the same side in this instance, it only seems fair to just wait and see what happens, rather than say "When they say Iran is only trying to produce electricity" we will call them liars go to war!
The very same people that you (or generically) {and the majority of this message board) are saying is going to say that Iran only wants peacefull nuclear energy are the same people that are warnimg the World right now, that Iran wants to build a nuclear warhead. Or at least the current President of Iran wants that.
Or something like that

Heh, thanks for that. Read it whilst eating lunch. :icon14:seremtan wrote:there's a good piece summing up the iran war buildup insanity by john pilger here -
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11851.htm
if anyone's interested
yea of course he only wants to supply his country with electricity,hes also laying down fibre optic cable so everyone can get high speed porn,
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
So essentially, fuck.R00k wrote:Scott Ritter claims he has talked to John Bolton's speechwriter, and they have already written the speech to be given after the Security Council finds no foul play - it says that America can't just sit idly by while Iran threatens us, and we must pre-emptively defend ourselves.seremtan wrote:there's a good piece summing up the iran war buildup insanity by john pilger here -
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e11851.htm
if anyone's interested
I'm not believing much of anything I'm reading right now - everybody seems to have their own version of how things are about to happen. The thing they all have in common though, is that we are going to attack Iran no matter what. Well, Ritter thinks that if the Dems can take the Congress back in '06 it can be stopped, but I think he's overly optimistic.
Either way, things are definitely gearing up right now. I only wish Fitzgerald would indict Cheney for passing classified info to Libby, and Bush would get impeached over the wiretapping program, quickly.
Bah I'm just rambling.
I love quake!
lol fucking hell someone's done a number on youbusetibi wrote:yea of course he only wants to supply his country with electricity,hes also laying down fibre optic cable so everyone can get high speed porn,
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
I love quake!
I hope the US tries the invade Iran. They wont, because Iran would nuke the incoming US troops. BTW, why does every post that bashes Israel gets angry responses that shoot the messenger of the post? I say, fuck Israel, theyre the source of many of these fucking conflicts. My guess is that there are too many powerful influential jews in the US right now, that control most of the media outlets, and lobby in Washington.
i see,feedback wrote:
lol fucking hell someone's done a number on you
my view differs from your view, so ive had a number done to me.
interesting,
so whats it like in your ivory tower?
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
are you clinically mental?busetibi wrote:yea of course he only wants to supply his country with electricity,hes also laying down fibre optic cable so everyone can get high speed porn,
a question.....
if you find a rabid dog, do you wait till it bites you before you destroy it?
btw,
how many Palestinians does it take to change a light globe?
none.
its easier to stay in the dark and blame Israel.
lebomb wrote:I hope the US tries the invade Iran. They wont, because Iran would nuke the incoming US troops.

what are they going to do?
cast wizard spells?
you fucking idiot :icon27:
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
seremtan wrote:
are you clinically mental?
its better than being clinically dead from the neck up
Gaza's Shirt:
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
Sayyid Iman Al-Sharif (aka Dr Fadl)
Part 1.
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp? ... 3&id=16980
Part 2.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=17003
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
I agree until the end. Even if Iran or some other idiot fanatical country did fire off a nuke, they surely wouldnt have the range and power to project the damage world wide. In the end they would fuck themsleves as every country would hammer the offending country and glass the place, but we would be fine up here in Canada. Other then the pollution from the fallout and such floating around the globe...Tormentius wrote:I'm totally against another US invasion but no country is stupid enough to start slinging nukes (Iran included). Taking that action would just result in every other nuclear power hitting the button and ending life on our little chunk of rock..lebomb wrote:I hope the US tries the invade Iran.
-
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am