Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:04 pm
Page 15 of 284
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:10 pm
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:49 pm
FFS raw, don't drink and internet. Stoopid 'sican.raw wrote:Comè mierda y muertè
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:41 pm
lol i have that.raw wrote:
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:03 pm
are you fucking thick?raw wrote:
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:05 pm
No actually he's pretty thin. budump tish.
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:11 pm
you're telling me. i could snap him with a flick of the finger.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 3:52 am
Im no pro. But this is last nights view.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:15 am
ruined via timestamp.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:50 am
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:03 am
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:05 am
and a cat.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:03 am
kitty
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:01 pm
jesus that's amazing. it almost looks like cgi... the lighting is so good.Dave wrote:
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:28 pm
Aye, 'tis uberrific :icon14:mjrpes wrote:jesus that's amazing. it almost looks like cgi... the lighting is so good.Dave wrote:
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:49 pm
ForM wrote:Im no pro. But this is last nights view.
[lvlshot]http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m139/gerbalhunter/Image4.jpg[/lvlshot]
Post the originals and I'll stitch them properly
Like the cat shot, prince.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:35 pm
I concur.mjrpes wrote:jesus that's amazing. it almost looks like cgi... the lighting is so good.Dave wrote:
PS, thanks for the tips. Is there any site which describes the basic things you can do in PS or something to play around and improve the photo, since image manipulation is something I know next to nothing about?
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:55 pm
TY sires. I used that 135 lens, mr. jeeps. I wish all of canon's lenses were that brilliant. I swear all you have to do is point that thing at something to get a great photo. It makes me wonder what that 85 f/1.2 gives you--for 2 grand.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:58 pm
I, too, have become a 135 prime convert. beyond the sharpness, the lens does something with light, colors and shadows... just makes everything seem so much more vivid and dramatic. my 70-300 DO has gotten little use since the purchase and my subsequent conversion.
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:57 pm
shut up. i don't want to spend £700 on a lensDave wrote:TY sires. I used that 135 lens, mr. jeeps. I wish all of canon's lenses were that brilliant. I swear all you have to do is point that thing at something to get a great photo. It makes me wonder what that 85 f/1.2 gives you--for 2 grand.
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:31 pm
Yes you do. Mr. Jeeps will concur.
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:32 pm
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 am
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:57 am
Sorry sir, it looks like DA is telling you to fuck off with direct linkingxer0s wrote:[lvlshot]http://ic1.deviantart.com/fs4/i/2005/143/0/5/Insect_Metropolis_by_xer0s.jpg[/lvlshot]
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:19 am
Durbin, South Africa, 8 ball action at the local 
[lvlshot]http://www.adam.com.au/samanoske/IMG_0787.JPG[/lvlshot]
edit: I only had a few seconds at the lights to grab the camera, turn it on and snap, the window was up cos the guide said it was a smash and grab area.
[lvlshot]http://www.adam.com.au/samanoske/IMG_0787.JPG[/lvlshot]
edit: I only had a few seconds at the lights to grab the camera, turn it on and snap, the window was up cos the guide said it was a smash and grab area.