PHOTOS PLEASE
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
previous to the last three posts i had a hard-on. nice work guys.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Excellent shots!saturn wrote:More Paris photos
View from Montmartre in Paris, bit noisy but you can see the many lights
Inside the Louvre museum
Piano bar in Paris
-
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:48 pm
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
saturn wrote:winged victory image
Amazing job, Saturn. I have been very fond of that since I had to draw it once in high school. Great sculpture and a fantastic picture

[i]Be sure your sin will find you out...[/i]
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Dude it was 4am at the airport. You could've taken a dump where I was standing and no one would notice.MaCaBr3 wrote: I knew you took a picture of the airport the moment I took mine, but I also wondered how the hell you got up there.
Also, I know that's your secret and what makes the difference between you and everyone else on this forum, but do you HDR all your pictures? You have this unique richness, colortone detail in all your pictures, I'm really curious.

My secrets? Oh, I don't know...I don't think I want to share it so that copy cats could mimic my awesomeness.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
beautiful... aside from its apparent clusterfucked poverty feel to it, probably holds a special atmosphere. Living in such close quarters were all these diff. aspects of life come together must be quite an experience. it's almost like looking at an art piece that undermines dimensions/ locations to capture the essence of everything in one frame.Fanatic X wrote:Where am I?
![]()
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
That's the spirit.MaCaBr3 wrote:![]()
Follow these steps:
- duplicate layer
- apply lucisart sculpture plug-in (30%)
- layer opacity: 70%
- duplicate layer again
- apply PS reduce noise - Strenght 10, preserve details 0, reduce color noise 100%, sharpen details 0
- layer opacity 15-25%
- merge 3 layers
(makes the photo look more like a picture/drawing)
Colour adjustments:
- may use dxo film pack
- may use simple hue/saturation tweaks
- work with multiple layers again, adjusting opacity for taming the effect
- i like reducing saturation sometimes
For improving contrast:
- unsharp mask: amount 10%, Radius 40 pixels, threshold 0
Sharpening:
- duplicate layer
- filter > other > high pass: 0.8 - 1.2 pixels
- layer=overlay, opacity 50%-80%
- merge layer
If shooting HDR:
- use photomatix
- generate HDR (3 - 5 exposures)
- tone-mapping (various settings)
- dump in photoshop and use above process
I use this work flow for my images 70% of the time.
Everyone benefits from sharing.

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
It certainly does, doesn't it. Certainly does..Tsakali_ wrote: beautiful... aside from its apparent clusterfucked poverty feel to it, probably holds a special atmosphere. Living in such close quarters were all these diff. aspects of life come together must be quite an experience. it's almost like looking at an art piece that undermines dimensions/ locations to capture the essence of everything in one frame.
WTF are you mumbling about artsy photo critic fag?

That clusterfuck is called Hong Kong.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Wow, tnx Fan, very good pointers, I actually didn't hope you were gonna be so detailed 

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
just take the complement for a job well done and shut it fatty.Fanatic X wrote:It certainly does, doesn't it. Certainly does..Tsakali_ wrote: beautiful... aside from its apparent clusterfucked poverty feel to it, probably holds a special atmosphere. Living in such close quarters were all these diff. aspects of life come together must be quite an experience. it's almost like looking at an art piece that undermines dimensions/ locations to capture the essence of everything in one frame.
WTF are you mumbling about artsy photo critic fag?![]()
That clusterfuck is called Hong Kong.
ps
I'm not sure if you're really a fatty but i have nothing else to go on.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:34 pm
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Question: Can't you just use a single RAW file instead of 3 different exposures in Photomatix?
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Three different exposures bracketed. One for dark, one for normal and one for light.
One raw could be used and stopping the exposure down and up, but it does not work out quite the same. Then others tend to over do the process and make it look like shit.
One raw could be used and stopping the exposure down and up, but it does not work out quite the same. Then others tend to over do the process and make it look like shit.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
I remember when they just taught us how to take good pictures and we didn't have fancy software to make them "look good". Just several tubs of chemicals and a dream.
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
All my picts are untouched (except for resizing for this thread)....straight from the camera.
Uh...except that B&W one of the guy in the wheelchair. When I posted that I was gay.
Uh...except that B&W one of the guy in the wheelchair. When I posted that I was gay.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
fancy softwarecreep wrote:I remember when they just taught us how to take good pictures and we didn't have fancy software to make them "look good". Just several tubs of chemicals and a dream.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Saturn - you know the name of this painting?


Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
And is HDR something that the camera does, or just something you do with software after the pic is taken, and in 'photography for idiots' terms, can someone tell me what it really does to the image quality? I wish I was capable of making pics with the quality in this thread, but even if I bought a real nice camera I'd still suck.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
it's called 'the raft of the medusa' by gericaulttnf wrote:Saturn - you know the name of this painting?
at least, that's what the title at the bottom of the picture says

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
i've got a lowly 17" lcd. all I could make out was the geric...something.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
A High Dynamic Range picture is created by merging 2 or more different exposures from the same composition, so technicaly your camera doesn't make HDR pictures, you have to use software like Photomatix Pro and CS3 to combine and process a set of pictures you took to create a HDR picture.tnf wrote:And is HDR something that the camera does, or just something you do with software after the pic is taken, and in 'photography for idiots' terms, can someone tell me what it really does to the image quality? I wish I was capable of making pics with the quality in this thread, but even if I bought a real nice camera I'd still suck.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
thx for the comments everybody
-
- Posts: 4755
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
made the last round on the mountains yesterday snatchurn. Thought of your :mock destiny: icon pose on top of the world as I ate shit on the wrong edge of a rutted-corn spring storm lift. My neck still aches, fucking done with the carbon and steel, I think, for another 8 months or better. :pisst
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Interesting PM. Made me think about my modus operandi.
- Nikon kitlens 18-55mm (the cheapest Nikon makes, which broke after a skier hit me on a snowboard run)
- Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 prime lens
- Nikkor 60mm f/2.8 macro lens
- and lately for city and landscape shots: a wide-angle Tokina 12-24mm f/4 which flares easily and produces a lot of chromatic abberation.
Photos are shot in JPEG and imported in iPhoto cause I'm lazy. Mostly a bit of contrast was added to photos. Lately I'm using Lightroom to get more dramatic effects and because it's a great photo-processing program. Photoshop is only used when there's heavy editing needed.
Most of the work is done when the photo is taken. Composition, available light and timing are the most important factors for a good photo IMO. Camera, lens and post-production come in second.
I'm still using my "old" and trusty Nikon D50 with 6 MP. The majority of my photos are taken with a:You guys take some awesome photographs. I'm just curious what kind of gear all of you are using, especially the lenses.
Saturn: Are you still shooting with the D70? What kind of glass are you using?
DB: How's that D3 treating you? Must be fucking nice...
Mac: Anything new with you?
I'm just wondering if I need a filter for my Nikkor 18-200mm and what you guys use to PP. (Lightroom? CS3? Anyone using Capture NX)
- Nikon kitlens 18-55mm (the cheapest Nikon makes, which broke after a skier hit me on a snowboard run)
- Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 prime lens
- Nikkor 60mm f/2.8 macro lens
- and lately for city and landscape shots: a wide-angle Tokina 12-24mm f/4 which flares easily and produces a lot of chromatic abberation.
Photos are shot in JPEG and imported in iPhoto cause I'm lazy. Mostly a bit of contrast was added to photos. Lately I'm using Lightroom to get more dramatic effects and because it's a great photo-processing program. Photoshop is only used when there's heavy editing needed.
Most of the work is done when the photo is taken. Composition, available light and timing are the most important factors for a good photo IMO. Camera, lens and post-production come in second.
-
- Posts: 4755
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
you live in a state of constant aesthetic saturation, don't you T-Sack.Tsakali_ wrote:beautiful... aside from its apparent clusterfucked poverty feel to it, probably holds a special atmosphere. Living in such close quarters were all these diff. aspects of life come together must be quite an experience. it's almost like looking at an art piece that undermines dimensions/ locations to capture the essence of everything in one frame.Fanatic X wrote:Where am I?
![]()
p.s.?
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
I don't have a D3, I used one for a bit and I didn't get on with it. However it's a great camera, just not for me.
I use CS3 and Aperture 2. Most of the editing is done in Adobe Camera RAW and I little sharpening in CS3.
B&W I normally find with channel looks best and strip the other channels out then convert back to RGB or convert to LAB and remove the AB channels.
Large amounts of RAW files i'll run through Aperture 2 which is by far the best RAW editor on the market next to Capture One.
Gear wise i have a 5D with a 24 - 105 f/4 L and a Sigma 70 - 200 f/2.8 DG which i think I'm going to sell in favor of a Canon 70 - 200 f/2.8 IS L. Speedlite 430 EX and 580 EX mkII and I flight case of other shit.
I use CS3 and Aperture 2. Most of the editing is done in Adobe Camera RAW and I little sharpening in CS3.
B&W I normally find with channel looks best and strip the other channels out then convert back to RGB or convert to LAB and remove the AB channels.
Large amounts of RAW files i'll run through Aperture 2 which is by far the best RAW editor on the market next to Capture One.
Gear wise i have a 5D with a 24 - 105 f/4 L and a Sigma 70 - 200 f/2.8 DG which i think I'm going to sell in favor of a Canon 70 - 200 f/2.8 IS L. Speedlite 430 EX and 580 EX mkII and I flight case of other shit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests