Quake3World

Posted: **Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:28 pm**

If you liked "The Departed", you definitely should watch "Infernal Affairs". Departed is based on this movie series.

Posted: **Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:33 pm**

Slither

Nathan Fillion = :icon14:

Posted: **Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:43 pm**

Ryoki wrote:I loathe Jennifer Anniston. :icon13:

OMG RAPIST

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:23 am**

feedback wrote:If you liked "The Departed", you definitely should watch "Infernal Affairs". Departed is based on this movie series.

I liked Departed but didn't like Infernal Affairs. Maybe if I watched Infernal Affairs before the Departed I would have liked A.I. a bit more but I thought Infernal Affairs didn't have anywhere close to the amount of tension, acting quality, script (well the subtitled stuff), and depth in characters that Departed had.

Still, it was the original and came up with the story so I'll give it that.

What'd you think feedback?

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:56 am**

Law wrote:
Ryoki wrote:I loathe Jennifer Anniston. :icon13:
So do I, which is what I told the person who recommended I watch it. She's not in it all that much thankfully, it's mainly Clive Owen.

yay, i absolutely hate clive owen :icon14:

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:36 am**

Infernal Affairs - 7/10

Was surprised to see a movie that fast could actually get a little boring near the end.

Also, the fastness kept me very much detached from all the main characters. Don't know if that was the intention, or what.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:55 pm**

SAW III: 1/10
This movie has so many plotholes and thrives on completely flawed logic. Terrible, terrible movie. The death traps weren't even very inventive. 1 point for gore.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:52 pm**

MKJ wrote:yay, i absolutely hate clive owen :icon14:

Really? I quite like him as an actor. He can talk properly too unlike most nasaly Yank actors.

Dwight was the man...

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:53 pm**

Jackal wrote:SAW III: 1/10
This movie has so many plotholes and thrives on completely flawed logic. Terrible, terrible movie. The death traps weren't even very inventive. 1 point for gore.

What is your opinion of the first 2?

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:58 pm**

Ryoki wrote:
Captain Mazda wrote:Enemy At The Gates
Coincidentally, that movie changed my outlook on sex scenes in films. I used to feel that every sex scene in every movie was stupid and boring, just taking away momentum from the rest of the film without adding anything useful. But the scene where Vasily and his bird get it on just breathes realism and romantix in a good way. The way they're messing about like beginners is just cute

Made me warm and fuzzy inside, it did.

yep i've noticed myself appreciating sex scenes on a deeper level these days.

btw, i'm being completely serious here when I say that one of the best sex scenes I've seen is in March of the Penguins.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:59 pm**

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:59 pm**

Law wrote:
MKJ wrote:yay, i absolutely hate clive owen :icon14:
Really? I quite like him as an actor. He can talk properly too unlike most nasaly Yank actors.

Dwight was the man...

lol, King Arthur

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:00 pm**

The Abyss - 8/10

It's a classic. Great stuff.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:07 pm**

Grudge wrote:The Abyss - 8/10

It's a classic. Great stuff.

it is, and the spec. ed. is ALMOST flawless - except for the glaring fact that it's non-anamorphic.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:11 pm**

Grudge wrote:lol, King Arthur

lol, never watched it.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:12 pm**

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Grudge wrote:The Abyss - 8/10

It's a classic. Great stuff.
it is, and the spec. ed. is ALMOST flawless - except for the glaring fact that it's non-anamorphic.

That's unforgivable.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:13 pm**

hurry, google it.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:16 pm**

Google what?

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:44 pm**

lol someone mentioned King Arthur.

Posted: **Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:03 pm**

Law wrote:
Jackal wrote:SAW III: 1/10
This movie has so many plotholes and thrives on completely flawed logic. Terrible, terrible movie. The death traps weren't even very inventive. 1 point for gore.
What is your opinion of the first 2?

They were enjoyable at least, though not exactly thought provoking.

Posted: **Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:15 am**

walk the line

that joaquin phoenix he like a phyco johnny cash

its still good tho

plus it has nice tele tones

Posted: **Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:31 am**

Jackal wrote:
Law wrote:
Jackal wrote:SAW III: 1/10
This movie has so many plotholes and thrives on completely flawed logic. Terrible, terrible movie. The death traps weren't even very inventive. 1 point for gore.
What is your opinion of the first 2?
They were enjoyable at least, though not exactly thought provoking.

hmmm, that's my opinion too really. They were far from masterpieces but being a horror fan I still felt they were worth paying to see. I've been reading that the third is at least on par with the first two. I hope I'm not disappointed.

Posted: **Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:33 am**

The Prestige,

and it was fucking GREAT

8/10 indeed, there where some slow parts, but David Bowe plays a retired Dir Tesla

Posted: **Sat Nov 04, 2006 3:06 am**

The Departed 8/10

Made me fucking scared of cell phones, though!

Posted: **Sat Nov 04, 2006 5:45 am**

I thought I already posted The Departed in this thread, but I don't see it in the last several pages. I gave it an 8/10 - possibly even a 9. Fucking great movie.

Also watched Saw 3 tonight. I'd say 5 or 6/10 -- I didn't think it was nearly as good as the last two. If not for the pieces of background about the previous ones, you wouldn't really miss much by not watching it at all.

Quake3World

The last movie you saw