Quake3World

CitizenKane wrote:Saw

2/10

thats generous, it wouldve been 0 if not for the very last scene. probably the worst acing ive ever seen, and every horror flick cliche in the book.fucking terrible

Read a bit about the budget, age and expertise of the guys who made it, you might appreciate it a bit more.

Marie Antoinette 7/10

It was pretty good, BUT.....could have been better, she tried to be experimental, then back peddles. The score for instance, sometimes the modern music worked great...
(though,one moment in particular it was retarded.)
Then the score resorts to period piece opera...
Nice costumes, not eough french people.....and the eding fucking sucked.


Open Season...in IMAX 3-D. 7/10

The Imax 3d part was fucking awsome....the movie....just okay....funny, but not half as funny as Madagascar.

marie antoinette eh, theres an aphex twin song on that soundtrack isnt there, that automatically makes the soundtrack good :icon14:

ps lol sofia coppola, godather pt3, etc

Sience of Sleep - 9/10

my mind was blown away...

Law wrote:

CitizenKane wrote:Saw

2/10

thats generous, it wouldve been 0 if not for the very last scene. probably the worst acing ive ever seen, and every horror flick cliche in the book.fucking terrible

Read a bit about the budget, age and expertise of the guys who made it, you might appreciate it a bit more.

"Four years ago the Melbourne film school friends were broke, but managed to scrounge $5000 to shoot one disturbing scene from their Saw film script involving a woman in a head-crushing bear trap.

DVD copies of the scene were sent to Hollywood studios and producers, with Evolution Entertainment snapping up the rights.

In the deal of their life, Whannell and Wan rejected an upfront payment from Evolution and chose to take a share of Saw's profits, a decision that made them multi-millionaires.

Saw, with Whannell starring and writing the script and Wan directing, was made in 2004 for just $US1.2 million.

It opened at number one in the US and went on to make $US103 million at the worldwide box office.

Last year Saw II, costing $US4 million to make, again debuted at number one and took $US144 million at the box office."

i thought saw was excellent. they way is jumps from suspicious char to the other is fun (unless you think you have it all figured out, then you feel dragged along a path of misinformation. until the last scene that is). and the whole psychology behind a sober doctor who starts going insane is spineshuddering material, IMO

oh, and having the credits come in while the movie is stull running owns too, gives it this 'endless' feel

Captain Mazda wrote:

seremtan wrote:Der Untergang - 8/10 - pretty good account of hitler's mind unravelling at the end. lots of shouting

Was cheering for the Soviets :icon31:

...who appeared in the movie for a whole 30 seconds and had no dialogue, or even a main character to speak of.

For a drama major, you suck

Anyone seen Flags of Our Fathers?

Going by their box office numbers I'd say you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who's seen that movie.

ek wrote:Anyone seen Flags of Our Fathers?

Fathom the hilarity if they removed the 'L' from the title.

hilarious

Law wrote:

ek wrote:Anyone seen Flags of Our Fathers?

Fathom the hilarity if they removed the 'L' from the title.

spazda?

Ryoki wrote:...who appeared in the movie for a whole 30 seconds and had no dialogue, or even a main character to speak of.

For a drama major, you suck

FFS, I didn't mean just in scenes where they were physically present. Each time they were mentioned, I thought about how awesome they were.

And do you do this all the time or just when you're watching a WW2 movie?

And how were they "awesome" exactly?

I did it when watching Enemy At The Gates (although a bit historically inaccurate in some scenes). There just wasn't a more powerful and loyal army than the Soviet Red.

oooh, we have a soviet fanboy on our hands.
Well, keep dreaming I guess.

Captain Mazda wrote:FFS, I didn't mean just in scenes where they were physically present. Each time they were mentioned, I thought about how awesome they were.

You need to read Antony Beevor's books Stalingrad and Berlin. For reasons of intellectual prosperity, general awesomeness & a greatly enhanced sense of perspective.

Captain Mazda wrote:Enemy At The Gates

Coincidentally, that movie changed my outlook on sex scenes in films. I used to feel that every sex scene in every movie was stupid and boring, just taking away momentum from the rest of the film without adding anything useful. But the scene where Vasily and his bird get it on just breathes realism and romantix in a good way. The way they're messing about like beginners is just cute

Made me warm and fuzzy inside, it did.

SplishSplash wrote:oooh, we have a soviet fanboy on our hands.
Well, keep dreaming I guess.

HIY IM JUMPING ON TEH SOVIET BANDWAGEN!!!11

Ryoki wrote:Coincidentally, that movie changed my outlook on sex scenes in films. I used to feel that every sex scene in every movie was stupid and boring, just taking away momentum from the rest of the film without adding anything useful. But the scene where Vasily and his bird get it on just breathes realism and romantix in a good way. The way they're messing about like beginners is just cute

Made me warm and fuzzy inside, it did.

Indeed, funny how none of the soldiers woke up. One of the quietest fucks ever

Captain Mazda wrote:HIY IM JUMPING ON TEH SOVIET BANDWAGEN!!!11

Do you know why they call them the 'incredible' Mets?

Because they're so incredible.

Captain Mazda wrote:Indeed, funny how none of the soldiers woke up. One of the quietest fucks ever

That's not at all what i meant :icon14:

oh boy.

Please to be explainifying your outburst of oh boy-ness sir Juggeh!

Law wrote:

CitizenKane wrote:Saw

2/10

thats generous, it wouldve been 0 if not for the very last scene. probably the worst acing ive ever seen, and every horror flick cliche in the book.fucking terrible

Read a bit about the budget, age and expertise of the guys who made it, you might appreciate it a bit more.

i dont care about the budget, saying that a movie is better because of the financial shortcomings with which it was made is just basically giving it sympathy. dostoevsky was living in extreme poverty when he wrote crime and punishment, he was actually writing against a deadline with a mean bastard of a publisher and he was doing it out of necessity, he need to write to eat. thats a situation where the artists financial background could be taken into account when assessing his work, Saw is not. Saw is just crap, tries to be sinister and clever but it just fails. imo