PHOTOS PLEASE

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

Very good.
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Post by Captain »

tnf wrote:what's the trick to taking pics of lighting during storms. i know you need a longer exposure, but what else?
Auto-shutter and a shitload of luck would work too, no?
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

No, you're better of having a long exposure and hoping that a lightning strikes during the exposure.
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

Ok wtf somehow I set the shutter speed on my d40 to 1/4000 (on the Manual mode). Now every picture I take is pitch black. How do I fix this? :x
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

um, set your shutter speed to something else, like 1/30 or 1/60?
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Big Kahuna Burger wrote:Ok wtf somehow I set the shutter speed on my d40 to 1/4000 (on the Manual mode). Now every picture I take is pitch black. How do I fix this? :x
1/4000 of a second. work it out.
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

RTFM? You change the shutterspeed by rotating the dial. At least on a Canon you do it that way. But really, if you have no clue about what ur doing, start shooting in automatic, then move on to Av or Tv then use P and move on to M.
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

Ok i figured it out
A1yssa
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 7:00 am

Post by A1yssa »

MaCaBr3 wrote:Well that's different :) Should have shown more of your face/eyes. Give a bit more personality to it.
my face is boring lol
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

FFS, I really suck at post-processing. I can never manage to get an HDR picture look like this:

(this picture is not mine it's from someon on flickr)

Image

I'm using CS3 and playing arround with the local adapation curve, but I have no idea how to achieve the effect as in the picture above or even FanaticX last picture.

Any help please?
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

I can't lie, man.. that's horrible
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

Oh, I thought it looked cool :p
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

It's a little too bling bling... it has a lot of dimensionality though
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

Is this kinda ok?

Image

It's my street with 5 exposures
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Shot with some slide film that's old enough to drive.

Image
dmmh
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dmmh »

MaCaBr3 wrote:FFS, I really suck at post-processing. I can never manage to get an HDR picture look like this:

(this picture is not mine it's from someon on flickr)

Image

I'm using CS3 and playing arround with the local adapation curve, but I have no idea how to achieve the effect as in the picture above or even FanaticX last picture.

Any help please?
I like these kind of HDR's too. Each to their own I guess :)
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

i'm with dave, looks vile imo
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

anyone else having issues with HDR in CS3? everytime i try it the EV level always reads EV 0.00 and not what i've set in ACR
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

It won't work if the exif is getting stripped off because it uses the embedded iso, f-stop and shutter data to figure out the EV differences.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

MaCaBr3 wrote:Is this kinda ok?

It's my street with 5 exposures
Well, there's a lot of depth and shadow detail, but to me it's just a picture of a street. Don't do HDR for HDR's sake, find a composition that looks good then determine if you need to enhance it with HDR (like digging the shadow detail out from under the cars). The prof I took a few classes with always told me when he thought my compositions "sucked" (his words)... It's a harsh reality, but if it forces you to look and think harder then roll with it and try again.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Dave wrote:It won't work if the exif is getting stripped off because it uses the embedded iso, f-stop and shutter data to figure out the EV differences.
i'm not stripping the data, why would i? i use bridge for hdr
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

Dave wrote:
MaCaBr3 wrote:Is this kinda ok?

It's my street with 5 exposures
Well, there's a lot of depth and shadow detail, but to me it's just a picture of a street. Don't do HDR for HDR's sake, find a composition that looks good then determine if you need to enhance it with HDR (like digging the shadow detail out from under the cars). The prof I took a few classes with always told me when he thought my compositions "sucked" (his words)... It's a harsh reality, but if it forces you to look and think harder then roll with it and try again.
I know my compos suck, I really should go out more often and just take pictures the whole day. When I was visiting a photographer friend in Sweden I could tell he was much more experienced then me when it came to composition. He used lines, pannings, 2/3 rule in almost every shot he took.

I tried taking a simple boring composition and enhance it a bit more in HDR, but apparentely that didn't go well :)

My only excuse is that in the area I live, there is really nothing interesting to take pictures. You guys seem to be living in these faboulus industrial/urban/natural enviroments. It's pretty boring where I live.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Doombrain wrote:
Dave wrote:It won't work if the exif is getting stripped off because it uses the embedded iso, f-stop and shutter data to figure out the EV differences.
i'm not stripping the data, why would i? i use bridge for hdr
no idea man, but that's the only thing I've seen that causes the EV 0 thing
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

MaCaBr3 wrote:I tried taking a simple boring composition and enhance it a bit more in HDR, but apparentely that didn't go well :)
Well, a boring composition is still a boring composition... You can photograph something boring and make it interesting, but if you set out to make it boring from the start, you're going to be, well, boring.

Part of the problem you might be having isn't that you live somewhere "boring," but that you've been there for so long you don't pick out the interesting parts. You can only walk down the same streets for so long before you stop noticing or caring about what you're looking at. Climb a fire escape, get on top of a building, bring a ladder, do something that might get you arrested, but look for a different perspective on the same old thing you see everyday.
MaCaBr3
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 1999 8:00 am

Post by MaCaBr3 »

the other thing is also, that I have a limited experience in post-processing, I have a few interesting shots that I will post later, that I wanna enhance a bit more, but I have no id how.
Post Reply