PHOTOS PLEASE
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm
FFS, I really suck at post-processing. I can never manage to get an HDR picture look like this:
(this picture is not mine it's from someon on flickr)

I'm using CS3 and playing arround with the local adapation curve, but I have no idea how to achieve the effect as in the picture above or even FanaticX last picture.
Any help please?
(this picture is not mine it's from someon on flickr)

I'm using CS3 and playing arround with the local adapation curve, but I have no idea how to achieve the effect as in the picture above or even FanaticX last picture.
Any help please?
I like these kind of HDR's too. Each to their own I guessMaCaBr3 wrote:FFS, I really suck at post-processing. I can never manage to get an HDR picture look like this:
(this picture is not mine it's from someon on flickr)
I'm using CS3 and playing arround with the local adapation curve, but I have no idea how to achieve the effect as in the picture above or even FanaticX last picture.
Any help please?

Well, there's a lot of depth and shadow detail, but to me it's just a picture of a street. Don't do HDR for HDR's sake, find a composition that looks good then determine if you need to enhance it with HDR (like digging the shadow detail out from under the cars). The prof I took a few classes with always told me when he thought my compositions "sucked" (his words)... It's a harsh reality, but if it forces you to look and think harder then roll with it and try again.MaCaBr3 wrote:Is this kinda ok?
It's my street with 5 exposures
I know my compos suck, I really should go out more often and just take pictures the whole day. When I was visiting a photographer friend in Sweden I could tell he was much more experienced then me when it came to composition. He used lines, pannings, 2/3 rule in almost every shot he took.Dave wrote:Well, there's a lot of depth and shadow detail, but to me it's just a picture of a street. Don't do HDR for HDR's sake, find a composition that looks good then determine if you need to enhance it with HDR (like digging the shadow detail out from under the cars). The prof I took a few classes with always told me when he thought my compositions "sucked" (his words)... It's a harsh reality, but if it forces you to look and think harder then roll with it and try again.MaCaBr3 wrote:Is this kinda ok?
It's my street with 5 exposures
I tried taking a simple boring composition and enhance it a bit more in HDR, but apparentely that didn't go well

My only excuse is that in the area I live, there is really nothing interesting to take pictures. You guys seem to be living in these faboulus industrial/urban/natural enviroments. It's pretty boring where I live.
no idea man, but that's the only thing I've seen that causes the EV 0 thingDoombrain wrote:i'm not stripping the data, why would i? i use bridge for hdrDave wrote:It won't work if the exif is getting stripped off because it uses the embedded iso, f-stop and shutter data to figure out the EV differences.
Well, a boring composition is still a boring composition... You can photograph something boring and make it interesting, but if you set out to make it boring from the start, you're going to be, well, boring.MaCaBr3 wrote:I tried taking a simple boring composition and enhance it a bit more in HDR, but apparentely that didn't go well
Part of the problem you might be having isn't that you live somewhere "boring," but that you've been there for so long you don't pick out the interesting parts. You can only walk down the same streets for so long before you stop noticing or caring about what you're looking at. Climb a fire escape, get on top of a building, bring a ladder, do something that might get you arrested, but look for a different perspective on the same old thing you see everyday.