Page 11 of 15

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:15 pm
by xer0s
Well, the thing is, the vast majority of Americans hate both Clinton and Trump...

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 8:03 pm
by seremtan
so does the vast majority of the world tbh, apart from the remnants of the Euro centre left

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:13 pm
by John^Rocker
i put hillary clinton on my ignore list.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:12 am
by Transient
Κracus wrote:I'm repeating myself but as I said, I don't think they were testing for a motor neuron disease, they were just testing for symptoms. A weak grip could signify something to the nurse. And yes, I think she's lying about the pneumonia, same as she lied about the emails.
Κracus wrote:6th pic down for the test she's conducting here. https://informatics.med.nyu.edu/modules ... motor.html
Testing for symptoms by performing the test in your link, which does not look anything like the picture you posted as evidence. Twice I explained why you're wrong. Round and round we go...
Transient wrote:That test requires checking both hands at the same time. Plus the doctor holds their hands above the patient's with the intent to pull up while the patient pulls down. The picture you posted and the link you gave don't share any similarities. The hand orientation and posture of the doctor and Clinton are in no way similar to the gestures used to conduct the test. The whole point of doing that particular test is to see if there's a difference in grip strength between both hands, so how is Clinton's doctor doing the test with just one hand? You would know this if you had read the text in your own link. Your entire theory is based on a test that's not being performed. The simple explanation is pneumonia, and you're delusional if you think a MND is more reasonable. Telling me I'm the one jumping to conclusions is pretty much the textbook definition of projection.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:37 am
by Don Carlos
Where is Saturn when you need him?

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:42 am
by seremtan
Memphis wrote:[youtube]nRp1CK_X_Yw[/youtube]
hay guise we made a video urging you to vote for Shillary with a bunch of famous people so you'll watch it like the dumb schmucks you are, but then to flatter your """intelligence""" we'll acknowledge the obvious artifice upfront in the hope that you'll see this admission itself as a kind of authenticity; and furthermore we're hoping that this bullshit-as-sincerity dynamic transfers over to the actual vote in November, so you'll overlook the glaring deficiencies of the candidate and vote for Shillary in a manner both ironic, and yet on some level you can't explain, heartfelt.
oh, and something about your family, community, America etc. VOTE SHILLARY

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:50 pm
by xer0s
General!

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:25 am
by Κracus
Transient... that's right. I think the nurse is doing a full blown medical motor neuron test in broad daylight in the middle of the street because that's what you'd do if someone was feeling faint in the middle of a huge public event...

OR!

Maybe I'm saying the nurse was checking her grip on her finger to see how weak she was.


Jeez, wonder which one makes sense here.... hmmmm so hard to figure out. /s

I linked the test to show it's how medical people would test that kind of thing. I'm sure the same test has many uses, not just a motor neuron test. I think Clinton has a serious health problem and she's hiding it.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:22 am
by Transient
Κracus wrote:That's an odd way to hold someones hand isn't it? Not so odd when you're performing a motor neuron test to see if a patient is having issues though. Oh and coincidentally, that's her nurse. Odd test for Pneumonia. She was given this test shortly before her collapse.

edit: 6th pic down for the test she's conducting here. https://informatics.med.nyu.edu/modules ... motor.html
First she's performing a motor neuron test, now she's just checking Clinton's grip? Ah, the classic pull-my-finger exam, I can see how you'd mistake the motor neuron test for it. After all, they look so much alike!

[lvlshot]http://russia-insider.com/sites/insider ... k=lfXqqzfc[/lvlshot] Image

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:33 am
by Captain
It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:35 am
by Transient
Pretty sure everyone but Kracus and I have moved on to the next scandal. Which one are we on to now? It's back to the emails, right?

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:49 am
by dubz
so whats your take on the email scandal transient?

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:50 am
by dubz
Image

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:02 am
by Transient
dubz wrote:so whats your take on the email scandal transient?
I think it shows a high degree of technical incompetence on her part. It was a totally avoidable problem, were it not for her mistrust and guarded nature. I don't think it was done maliciously in order to hide shady dealings, but the fact that she wanted to be off the record from her peers in office is bad enough. It makes me wonder what else she's doing in secret.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:19 am
by shaft
That shit has been happening since the inception of email in the government, she just happens to be the first secretary of state since email began that has run for president. Not saying its ok, im just saying its not a recent thing or a Clinton thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Whit ... ontroversy

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:18 am
by dubz
Transient wrote:
dubz wrote:so whats your take on the email scandal transient?
I think it shows a high degree of technical incompetence on her part. It was a totally avoidable problem, were it not for her mistrust and guarded nature. I don't think it was done maliciously in order to hide shady dealings, but the fact that she wanted to be off the record from her peers in office is bad enough. It makes me wonder what else she's doing in secret.
and the fact that she deleted thousands of emails after she got an order to hand them over? breaking her blackberrys with hammers after the subpoena? saying she didnt know that "C" stands for classified even tho its known from earlier leaks she knew how to tag classified documents appropriately?


cant wait for tomorows debate

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:36 am
by Transient
It makes me wonder. But the phone-breaking thing is something every politician does, it's standard procedure to destroy government-issued phones after you're done with them, but the idiot aides that did it shouldn't have been doing it with a fucking hammer. She doesn't know how to work modern technology properly and neither does her inner circle.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:08 am
by Eraser
Captain Mazda wrote:It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.
But it's much more fun shovelling shit on Kracus.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:19 am
by Transient
[youtube]h1Lfd1aB9YI[/youtube]

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:46 am
by seremtan
Captain Mazda wrote:It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.
it's a bad thing that this will have more influence on the outcome of the election than those things :|

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:34 pm
by scared?
Watch John Oliver and he'll put the email and Clinton foundation scandals compared to Trump's shitstorm into perspective...

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:58 pm
by Lieutenant Dan
scared? wrote:Watch John Oliver and he'll put the email and Clinton foundation scandals compared to Trump's shitstorm into perspective...
I can't believe I'm agreeing, but yes.

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 3:52 pm
by Ryoki
Memphis wrote: This one? :|
:olo:

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:23 pm
by seremtan
:| indeed

the cynicism never ends

Re: President Clinton

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:59 am
by Ryoki
Wait, so the scandal here is that the Lybian intervention went wrong real fast and wasn't a particulary humanitarian mission to begin with? Did... did anyone actually believe otherwise at any point?

Maybe i've become a bit cynical after many years of following wars and stuff, but this surely isn't news.