President Clinton

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by xer0s »

Well, the thing is, the vast majority of Americans hate both Clinton and Trump...
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by seremtan »

so does the vast majority of the world tbh, apart from the remnants of the Euro centre left
John^Rocker
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by John^Rocker »

i put hillary clinton on my ignore list.
quake4legends
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Transient »

Κracus wrote:I'm repeating myself but as I said, I don't think they were testing for a motor neuron disease, they were just testing for symptoms. A weak grip could signify something to the nurse. And yes, I think she's lying about the pneumonia, same as she lied about the emails.
Κracus wrote:6th pic down for the test she's conducting here. https://informatics.med.nyu.edu/modules ... motor.html
Testing for symptoms by performing the test in your link, which does not look anything like the picture you posted as evidence. Twice I explained why you're wrong. Round and round we go...
Transient wrote:That test requires checking both hands at the same time. Plus the doctor holds their hands above the patient's with the intent to pull up while the patient pulls down. The picture you posted and the link you gave don't share any similarities. The hand orientation and posture of the doctor and Clinton are in no way similar to the gestures used to conduct the test. The whole point of doing that particular test is to see if there's a difference in grip strength between both hands, so how is Clinton's doctor doing the test with just one hand? You would know this if you had read the text in your own link. Your entire theory is based on a test that's not being performed. The simple explanation is pneumonia, and you're delusional if you think a MND is more reasonable. Telling me I'm the one jumping to conclusions is pretty much the textbook definition of projection.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Don Carlos »

Where is Saturn when you need him?
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by seremtan »

Memphis wrote:[youtube]nRp1CK_X_Yw[/youtube]
hay guise we made a video urging you to vote for Shillary with a bunch of famous people so you'll watch it like the dumb schmucks you are, but then to flatter your """intelligence""" we'll acknowledge the obvious artifice upfront in the hope that you'll see this admission itself as a kind of authenticity; and furthermore we're hoping that this bullshit-as-sincerity dynamic transfers over to the actual vote in November, so you'll overlook the glaring deficiencies of the candidate and vote for Shillary in a manner both ironic, and yet on some level you can't explain, heartfelt.
oh, and something about your family, community, America etc. VOTE SHILLARY
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by xer0s »

General!
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Κracus »

Transient... that's right. I think the nurse is doing a full blown medical motor neuron test in broad daylight in the middle of the street because that's what you'd do if someone was feeling faint in the middle of a huge public event...

OR!

Maybe I'm saying the nurse was checking her grip on her finger to see how weak she was.


Jeez, wonder which one makes sense here.... hmmmm so hard to figure out. /s

I linked the test to show it's how medical people would test that kind of thing. I'm sure the same test has many uses, not just a motor neuron test. I think Clinton has a serious health problem and she's hiding it.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Transient »

Κracus wrote:That's an odd way to hold someones hand isn't it? Not so odd when you're performing a motor neuron test to see if a patient is having issues though. Oh and coincidentally, that's her nurse. Odd test for Pneumonia. She was given this test shortly before her collapse.

edit: 6th pic down for the test she's conducting here. https://informatics.med.nyu.edu/modules ... motor.html
First she's performing a motor neuron test, now she's just checking Clinton's grip? Ah, the classic pull-my-finger exam, I can see how you'd mistake the motor neuron test for it. After all, they look so much alike!

[lvlshot]http://russia-insider.com/sites/insider ... k=lfXqqzfc[/lvlshot] Image
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Captain »

It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Transient »

Pretty sure everyone but Kracus and I have moved on to the next scandal. Which one are we on to now? It's back to the emails, right?
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
dubz
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:07 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by dubz »

so whats your take on the email scandal transient?
dubz
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:07 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by dubz »

Image
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Transient »

dubz wrote:so whats your take on the email scandal transient?
I think it shows a high degree of technical incompetence on her part. It was a totally avoidable problem, were it not for her mistrust and guarded nature. I don't think it was done maliciously in order to hide shady dealings, but the fact that she wanted to be off the record from her peers in office is bad enough. It makes me wonder what else she's doing in secret.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
shaft
Posts: 12473
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by shaft »

That shit has been happening since the inception of email in the government, she just happens to be the first secretary of state since email began that has run for president. Not saying its ok, im just saying its not a recent thing or a Clinton thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Whit ... ontroversy
dubz
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:07 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by dubz »

Transient wrote:
dubz wrote:so whats your take on the email scandal transient?
I think it shows a high degree of technical incompetence on her part. It was a totally avoidable problem, were it not for her mistrust and guarded nature. I don't think it was done maliciously in order to hide shady dealings, but the fact that she wanted to be off the record from her peers in office is bad enough. It makes me wonder what else she's doing in secret.
and the fact that she deleted thousands of emails after she got an order to hand them over? breaking her blackberrys with hammers after the subpoena? saying she didnt know that "C" stands for classified even tho its known from earlier leaks she knew how to tag classified documents appropriately?


cant wait for tomorows debate
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Transient »

It makes me wonder. But the phone-breaking thing is something every politician does, it's standard procedure to destroy government-issued phones after you're done with them, but the idiot aides that did it shouldn't have been doing it with a fucking hammer. She doesn't know how to work modern technology properly and neither does her inner circle.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Eraser »

Captain Mazda wrote:It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.
But it's much more fun shovelling shit on Kracus.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Transient »

[youtube]h1Lfd1aB9YI[/youtube]
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by seremtan »

Captain Mazda wrote:It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.
it's a bad thing that this will have more influence on the outcome of the election than those things :|
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: President Clinton

Post by scared? »

Watch John Oliver and he'll put the email and Clinton foundation scandals compared to Trump's shitstorm into perspective...
Lieutenant Dan
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:25 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Lieutenant Dan »

scared? wrote:Watch John Oliver and he'll put the email and Clinton foundation scandals compared to Trump's shitstorm into perspective...
I can't believe I'm agreeing, but yes.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Ryoki »

Memphis wrote: This one? :|
:olo:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by seremtan »

:| indeed

the cynicism never ends
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: President Clinton

Post by Ryoki »

Wait, so the scandal here is that the Lybian intervention went wrong real fast and wasn't a particulary humanitarian mission to begin with? Did... did anyone actually believe otherwise at any point?

Maybe i've become a bit cynical after many years of following wars and stuff, but this surely isn't news.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Post Reply