Quake3World

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:

plained wrote:ey was my guns for ipad/iphones a bad idea?

i thought it was pretty good

too Nazi-esque...

ey i'm not trolling or anything here i really am very ignorant and plain stupid with this stuff.

why is it bad?

YourGrandpa wrote:i have clearly displayed your ignorance.

yeah great point there moron...wtf?...

obsidian wrote: So, are you for or against gun control? Because I don't know what you're arguing about here.

The US already has gun control. Just not to the degree you feel is sufficient. I also do not think our gun control is sufficient. But possibly not to the degree you do.

Ban all guns except hunting rifles?...

lol

Reading this crap reminds me of a few weeks ago when I purposefully acted like a complete and utter fuckwad on this discussion in another thread to prove a point that gun-nuts ALWAYS act like complete and utter fuckwads and all the gun-nuts (as I predicted and hoped they would) went frothy, with idiots like Nightshade and xer0s telling me that I was "probably crazy". Any person who reads the crap gramps has posted the last few pages in this thread probably couldn't be faulted for laughing their ass off at how utterly unreachable and unreasonable he is.

Un-fucking-real.

xer0s is too stupid to know how stupid he is, so in a way I can forgive most of the rampant moronics that he posts day in day out. Dunno about the others though...I'm guessing they're probably just assholes who don't like being told what to do or don't like being told that their paranoia is retarded.

Oh...and I have no doubt that most of the idiots who want guns for "protection" are probably the kind of scared, wimp-assed pussies that would pull their gun out if they were losing a straight up fist fight. Pathetic.




Bring the rage motherfuckers...

geez thx for nothing ey i was just seeking knowledge and wisdom pah

ok ey how about ok have all the guns u want, but now outside of target and hunting activities ur hand gun can only shoot custum made non leathel dna-data-embedded bullets !

ey ? ey?

plained wrote:ur hand gun can only shoot custum made non leathel dna-data-embedded bullets !

ey ? ey?

Dear plained,

Please don't give the crazy people ideas.

Thank you for your understanding;

Signed:
Planet Earth

GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Bring the rage motherfuckers...

No rage here. We're simply different people with different points of view. Are you sure you can continue living knowing that everyone in the world doesn't agree with you?

YourGrandpa wrote:

shaft wrote:Tell us Gramps, how would gun education have saved the Sandy Hook children?

Maybe if the mother was better educated on the proper storage of fire arms and the possibilities of not doing so, her son might not have been able to access them.

How do you know she didn't have them stored properly? Shes dead. What type of firearm storage is safe enough when someone is willing to kill you to get to them?

Gonnafagya is half a retard but u are full retard?...

YourGrandpa wrote:Are you sure you can continue living knowing that everyone in the world doesn't agree with you?

Wow....just.....wow.

shaft wrote: How do you know she didn't have them stored properly? Shes dead. What type of firearm storage is safe enough when someone is willing to kill you to get to them?

We can what-if this shit to death. What if she didn't have them stored properly? What if she never spent time educating her son? What if she was an assassin for hire that had been training her son to take over her top secret job and everything backfired? What if on the 21st the world really does end and none of the shit really matters? What if?

GONNAFISTYA wrote:

Wow....just.....wow.

Wow is right.

YourGrandpa wrote:

shaft wrote: How do you know she didn't have them stored properly? Shes dead. What type of firearm storage is safe enough when someone is willing to kill you to get to them?

We can what-if this shit to death. What if she didn't have them stored properly? What if she never spent time educating her son? What if she was an assassin for hire that had been training her son to take over her top secret job and everything backfired? What if on the 21st the world really does end and none of the shit really matters? What if?

There wasn't a single "what if" in my post. I asked how you knew they weren't stored properly and what type of safe you need.
Maybe you should've just said "I don't know" instead of babbling like an idiot.

shaft wrote:There wasn't a single "what if" in my post. I asked how you knew they weren't stored properly and what type of safe you need.
Maybe you should've just said "I don't know" instead of babbling like an idiot.

The nature of you comment was "what-if", dumb dumb... You can't figure out the concept of a safe? I also asked how you knew they were stored properly? Maybe you should have just said "I don't know" instead of babbling like an idiot.

YourGrandpa wrote:

losCHUNK wrote: You are more likely to kill someone though, as a gun owner you are included in the figures that puff posted. You and your gun are more likely to kill your family or others by simply having it in the house or living in a state that's all yeehaw, as opposed to living somewhere more normal without any guns.

That's without going into anything 'accidental' so no need for the car comparison, which is retarded as the differences can be listed in a book as thick as your brain - cars are pretty much required and are actually designed to prevent deaths from accidents.

You're a moron beyond comprehension. I've already learned that engaging you in conversation is pointless. K THX BYE.

You already did, not my fault you like putting your families life in danger, because you can

losCHUNK wrote: DUUUURH...

YourGrandpa wrote:

shaft wrote:There wasn't a single "what if" in my post. I asked how you knew they weren't stored properly and what type of safe you need.
Maybe you should've just said "I don't know" instead of babbling like an idiot.

The nature of you comment was "what-if", dumb dumb... You can't figure out the concept of a safe? I also asked how you knew they were stored properly? Maybe you should have just said "I don't know" instead of babbling like an idiot.

No it wasn't. You claimed that more education for gun owners is the answer to gun violence and then you specifically said that she should have stored them properly. Asking how you knew she didn't have them stored properly isn't a "what if". I never claimed to how they were stored, you did.

You clearly don't know the concept of a safe. You said if they were in a safe he wouldn't have been able to access them to kill people. Yet you cant seem to show me the fool proof safe that someone cant be force to open? When someone who can open the safe is there to injure or kill it really doesn't matter if the guns are in a safe. Not unless that person is willing to die for it. How is more education going to fix that?

So I ask again, how could proper gun education have saved the lives of the people at Sandy Hook? Not having access to guns in the first place seem pretty fool proof to me. But if you're going to say proper education and gun storage, please back up your moronic claims.

[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/OOwQp.jpg[/lvlshot]

walked past this on the way to work.

hope that tac'd out assault rifle is worth it, gramps.

YourGrandpa wrote:

EtUL wrote:Was what I was saying clear to anyone else because I don't understand how gramps is getting
from what I typed. I'm not sure how to rephrase that point.

I understood what you said and I don't agree with your assessment of gun owners. Your claim is that because I own a gun I am more likely to kill someone. I say your assumption is nonsensical rubbish. I'm no more likely to kill someone or myself because I own gun than if I own a car.

Do you understand what you typed?

That is not what I was saying at all.

shaft wrote:No it wasn't. You claimed that more education for gun owners is the answer to gun violence and then you specifically said that she should have stored them properly. Asking how you knew she didn't have them stored properly isn't a "what if". I never claimed to how they were stored, you did.

You clearly don't know the concept of a safe. You said if they were in a safe he wouldn't have been able to access them to kill people. Yet you cant seem to show me the fool proof safe that someone cant be force to open? When someone who can open the safe is there to injure or kill it really doesn't matter if the guns are in a safe. Not unless that person is willing to die for it. How is more education going to fix that?

So I ask again, how could proper gun education have saved the lives of the people at Sandy Hook? Not having access to guns in the first place seem pretty fool proof to me. But if you're going to say proper education and gun storage, please back up your moronic claims.

You're dumber than a bag of dicks if you can't figure out any way that having better educated gun owners could prevent some of the gun violence... You are the one who requested some kind of direct correlation to the Sandy Hook incident. I used a maybe/might example that could be applied. You then come back asking for specifics to my maybe/might scenario. Which anyone could construe as "what-ifs". Why don't you explain to me exactly how education couldn't possibly have played a positive roll in this case and I'll shoot holes in that.

Your approach to the safe is also nonsensical. Why do they have locks on house door when you can easily kick them in? Why do people use metal forks when someone can easily stab you in the face with it? You approach this from the worst case and expect it to be full proof every time? Why use your seat belt when a tractor trailer can simply crush your car. Fuck you and your moronic approach.

YourGrandpa wrote:full proof

full proof = mass shootings don't matter because cancer is 'worse'

YourGrandpa wrote:That's ridiculous.

this entire thread is ridiculous

no one's going to change anyone's mind here

YourGrandpa wrote:

losCHUNK wrote: DUUUURH...

living in denial my friend, can't even argue the facts, like the only sane person in the asylum