Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:49 pm
nano be gettin big yo i can hardly see it
Page 2 of 8
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:09 pm
You can still reach the mini by fiddling with local applestores (UK store) and whatnot. I presume they'd at least sell the remaining stock, there must be some left.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:28 pm
i brought a shuffle a few months ago when it came out
i guess i will be giving that away and getting this now
i guess i will be giving that away and getting this now
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:02 pm
a 60 would hold about a third of mine+JuggerNaut+ wrote:so a 60GB holds your entire collection? how sadglossy wrote:4GB :\
Re: Cool, iPod nano
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:40 pm
Not really that much smaller. It's about half as thick as my regular ipod, and not significantly smaller along the other dimensions.Eraser wrote:2Gb or 4Gb, but very, very small
Ipod nano:
3.5 x 1.6 x 0.27
Old ipod:
4.1 x 2.4 x 0.63
hardly worthy of being called nano...
Looks like they've gotten rid of the mini ipod.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:26 am
sure, right now it does.Dave wrote:a 60 would hold about a third of mine+JuggerNaut+ wrote:so a 60GB holds your entire collection? how sadglossy wrote:4GB :\
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:29 am
Fatboy Slim.. good taste
Re: Cool, iPod nano
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:46 am
The iPod mini was significantly smaller than the regular ipod. This nano is even smaller than the mini.[xeno]Julios wrote:Not really that much smaller. It's about half as thick as my regular ipod, and not significantly smaller along the other dimensions.Eraser wrote:2Gb or 4Gb, but very, very small
Ipod nano:
3.5 x 1.6 x 0.27
Old ipod:
4.1 x 2.4 x 0.63
hardly worthy of being called nano...
Looks like they've gotten rid of the mini ipod.
But it seems that the mini is completely gone, as 6Gb is a rather nice amount of space.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:47 am
i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish+JuggerNaut+ wrote:so, when your library surpasses the 40GB mark, then what? 60GB? there isn't a player that i know of on the planet that can hold my entire library, so i don't see what the point is to try and carry it.glossy wrote:with the 15GB of music in my iTunes library, plus the albums I physically own, i would feel uncomfortable with a 20GB iPod. I'm hoping to get a 40GB soon, to fit all my music comfortably plus the space to use it as a removable harddrive when I need.Don Carlos wrote: Fine for a job or summat
Not gonna get through 60 gig of music unless you run round the world
@ridda: 4GB Flash drive, 1.5 ounces, color screen - that's a ripoff? you're delusional.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:13 am
i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbpsglossy wrote:i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish+JuggerNaut+ wrote:so, when your library surpasses the 40GB mark, then what? 60GB? there isn't a player that i know of on the planet that can hold my entire library, so i don't see what the point is to try and carry it.glossy wrote: with the 15GB of music in my iTunes library, plus the albums I physically own, i would feel uncomfortable with a 20GB iPod. I'm hoping to get a 40GB soon, to fit all my music comfortably plus the space to use it as a removable harddrive when I need.
@ridda: 4GB Flash drive, 1.5 ounces, color screen - that's a ripoff? you're delusional.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:16 am
either way 30 gb is bttr than 4, and the size differences aint big, so (my) ipod photo is better than the new nano. there.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:07 am
I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbpsglossy wrote:i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish+JuggerNaut+ wrote: so, when your library surpasses the 40GB mark, then what? 60GB? there isn't a player that i know of on the planet that can hold my entire library, so i don't see what the point is to try and carry it.
@ridda: 4GB Flash drive, 1.5 ounces, color screen - that's a ripoff? you're delusional.
Re: Cool, iPod nano
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:25 am
But that would mean that the nano is significantly smaller than the regular ipod and then some.Eraser wrote:The iPod mini was significantly smaller than the regular ipod. This nano is even smaller than the mini.[xeno]Julios wrote:Not really that much smaller. It's about half as thick as my regular ipod, and not significantly smaller along the other dimensions.Eraser wrote:2Gb or 4Gb, but very, very small
Ipod nano:
3.5 x 1.6 x 0.27
Old ipod:
4.1 x 2.4 x 0.63
hardly worthy of being called nano...
Looks like they've gotten rid of the mini ipod.
But it seems that the mini is completely gone, as 6Gb is a rather nice amount of space.
But the measurements I've posted indicate otherwise.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:31 am
hello, one of two.Dave wrote:I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbpsglossy wrote: i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:34 am
Hardcore!!!!Dave wrote:I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbpsglossy wrote: i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:35 am
i'm mostly flac. how about you?Dave wrote:I'm not, which is why my collection is 130 gigs :icon26:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i forget alot of you are ok with 128kbpsglossy wrote: i can't see my music library getting to that size anytime within worry. extrapolation places that point at about 2008ish
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:19 pm
Not that advanced.. I have quite a few 320 kbit AAC files
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:22 pm
compression is ok if its all you can afford jugg.
i use 44100 and 16665 or whatever, it sounds like snapshots of sound but its better than a rackety racket.
i use 44100 and 16665 or whatever, it sounds like snapshots of sound but its better than a rackety racket.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:24 pm
Holly Shit, I just might actualy, finaly, get an iPod.
Any idea on the price?
Any idea on the price?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:54 pm
UK price
£139.00 2gig
£179.00 4gig
£139.00 2gig
£179.00 4gig
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:15 pm
thats pretty cool
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:22 pm
um- can anyone tell me why the nano is so cool? It's not that much smaller than the regular ipod.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:47 pm
We get raped once again. Fuck that shit. I'm importing if I get one.mad wrote:UK price
£139.00 2gig
£179.00 4gig
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:48 pm
Because it's another overhyped and obsolete product from apple and this time it's a few mm smaller.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:45 am
sorry, but FLAC is lossless.plained wrote:compression is ok if its all you can afford jugg.
i use 44100 and 16665 or whatever, it sounds like snapshots of sound but its better than a rackety racket.