Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:58 am
Dave wrote:Don't forget the "autodownloadimagetoq3wserverresizeimageandmaintainimagedatabase=true" setting
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:59 am
Need some salt to go with that knife?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:59 am
for starters, the server would need to have imageresize&compression software installed on it, which it doesnt.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:59 am
it was a spoon a moment ago
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:01 am
No it wouldn't. The browser does it. just put width + height in the img tag.MKJ wrote:for starters, the server would need to have imageresize&compression software installed on it, which it doesnt.
(BTW Just like the lvlshot tag does it genius.)
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:08 am
wait, so the only thing you want is an image resized to 80x80 instead of the 320x240 (i think), without any change in filesize?
why ?
why ?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:10 am
it's practical at 320, it's not at 80. If you want a true thumbnail, make it yourself or upload it to imageshack.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:11 am
to MKJ:
so we can thumbnail images? Especially in quotes?
to Dave:
I don't see why it's impractical. 80x80 is still big enough to tell what the original image was. We wouldn't have threads clogged with the same huge image quoted over and over again.
so we can thumbnail images? Especially in quotes?
to Dave:
I don't see why it's impractical. 80x80 is still big enough to tell what the original image was. We wouldn't have threads clogged with the same huge image quoted over and over again.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:11 am
or just do it yourself here, using the img html tag 
!!!
as such:
<img src="http://www.quake3world.com/forum/images/forums/1.jpg" height="80" width="80" alt="omglol" />
yea that looks real good :icon14:
!!!as such:
<img src="http://www.quake3world.com/forum/images/forums/1.jpg" height="80" width="80" alt="omglol" />
yea that looks real good :icon14:
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:12 am
nongeeks 
(@Splash)
(@Splash)Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:12 am
so its easier to change a tag in a quote than just delete it all together?SplishSplash wrote:so we can thumbnail images? Especially in quotes?
this is starting to sound like a kracus-idea
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:12 am
you do understand that a 2 MB image file resized in the browser to 80px is still a 2 MB image file, right?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:13 am
MKJ wrote:so its easier to change a tag in a quote than just delete it all together?SplishSplash wrote:so we can thumbnail images? Especially in quotes?
this is starting to sound like a kracus-idea
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:14 am
heh. thats why i asked if he meant that.Dave wrote:you do understand that a 2 MB image file resized in the browser to 80px is still a 2 MB image file, right?
twice
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:14 am
Yeah I could do that. Over and over. Or Dave could be nice guy and just copy the lvlshot command. Once.MKJ wrote:or just do it yourself here, using the img html tag
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:14 am
Yeah I know but it's in my browser cache anyway.Dave wrote:you do understand that a 2 MB image file resized in the browser to 80px is still a 2 MB image file, right?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:16 am
^^ isn't that cool?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:16 am
so either you type <img src="*ctrl-v* height="80" width="80"></img> or you weed out all the lvlshots in quotes and replace them with [lvlshot2]ctrl-v[/lvlshot2].SplishSplash wrote:Yeah I could do that. Over and over. Or Dave could be nice guy and just copy the lvlshot command. Once.MKJ wrote:or just do it yourself here, using the img html tag
a real timesaver, im sure
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:16 am
No but people would still know what I'm talking about. It's easier to change the tag than to describe the pic as the "pic with huge balloon and hooker".MKJ wrote:
so its easier to change a tag in a quote than just delete it all together?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:16 am
what if I don't want to download a 2MB image file and store it in my cache? My option gives the user a choice, lvlshot/"thumbshot" doesn'tSplishSplash wrote:Yeah I know but it's in my browser cache anyway.Dave wrote:you do understand that a 2 MB image file resized in the browser to 80px is still a 2 MB image file, right?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:17 am
YOUR ICONS SEEM TO BE BROKEN SIR !Dave wrote:
^^ isn't that cool?
SET DESKTOPGFX = 1 !
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:18 am
No it sucks because I have to download a pic and then upload it to imageshack just to get the thumbnail.Dave wrote:
^^ isn't that cool?
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:18 am
crap, i thought something was upMKJ wrote:YOUR ICONS SEEM TO BE BROKEN SIR !Dave wrote:
^^ isn't that cool?
SET DESKTOPGFX = 1 !
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:18 am
if you quote someone who posted an img (along with some text, most likely) its pretty obvious what you're talking about innit.SplishSplash wrote:No but people would still know what I'm talking about. It's easier to change the tag than to describe the pic as the "pic with huge balloon and hooker".MKJ wrote:
so its easier to change a tag in a quote than just delete it all together?
also, downsizing a 640x480 img to 80x80 doesnt make it all that clear either
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:18 am
I can't help you're lazySplishSplash wrote:No it sucks because I have to download a pic and then upload it to imageshack just to get the thumbnail.Dave wrote:
^^ isn't that cool?