Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:32 am
No it's not:Dave wrote:it is the only man made object (or was) visible from space without a satellite
http://www.snopes.com/science/greatwal.htm
No it's not:Dave wrote:it is the only man made object (or was) visible from space without a satellite
like it says, space is a general term. certainly not the moon though...Ryoki wrote:No it's not:Dave wrote:it is the only man made object (or was) visible from space without a satellite
http://www.snopes.com/science/greatwal.htm
Dave wrote: like it says, space is a general term. certainly not the moon though...
snopes.com :icon10:Dave wrote:I found the great wall.. it shouldnt be too hard considering it is the only man made object (or was) visible from space without a satellite
If we take "space" to mean a low Earth orbit such as the one travelled by the Space Shuttle (roughly 160 to 350 miles above Earth), the Great Wall claim fails twice. First of all, it's not the only object visible from that distance: NASA's Earth from Space photographic archive (particularly the Human Interactions section) shows that pictures taken from low orbit reveal human-built structures such as highways, airports, bridges, dams, and components of the Kennedy Space Center. Secondly, even though other objects are visible at this distance, according to Shuttle astronaut Jay Apt, the Great Wall is barely discernable, if not invisible:
We look for the Great Wall of China. Although we can see things as small as airport runways, the Great Wall seems to be made largely of materials that have the same color as the surrounding soil. Despite persistent stories that it can be seen from the moon, the Great Wall is almost invisible from only 180 miles up!

read my last post. I said you can't see the wall, you can see the ridge it runs along. You can't see it at all in the section i referenced, but it's there following the ridgeMKJ wrote:you didnt read more than the first paragraph then
If we take "space" to mean a low Earth orbit such as the one travelled by the Space Shuttle (roughly 160 to 350 miles above Earth), the Great Wall claim fails twice. First of all, it's not the only object visible from that distance: NASA's Earth from Space photographic archive (particularly the Human Interactions section) shows that pictures taken from low orbit reveal human-built structures such as highways, airports, bridges, dams, and components of the Kennedy Space Center. Secondly, even though other objects are visible at this distance, according to Shuttle astronaut Jay Apt, the Great Wall is barely discernable, if not invisible:
We look for the Great Wall of China. Although we can see things as small as airport runways, the Great Wall seems to be made largely of materials that have the same color as the surrounding soil. Despite persistent stories that it can be seen from the moon, the Great Wall is almost invisible from only 180 miles up!
thats something elseDave wrote:read my last post. I said you can't see the wall, you can see the ridge it runs along. You can't see it at all in the section i referenced, but it's there following the ridgeMKJ wrote:you didnt read more than the first paragraph then
If we take "space" to mean a low Earth orbit such as the one travelled by the Space Shuttle (roughly 160 to 350 miles above Earth), the Great Wall claim fails twice. First of all, it's not the only object visible from that distance: NASA's Earth from Space photographic archive (particularly the Human Interactions section) shows that pictures taken from low orbit reveal human-built structures such as highways, airports, bridges, dams, and components of the Kennedy Space Center. Secondly, even though other objects are visible at this distance, according to Shuttle astronaut Jay Apt, the Great Wall is barely discernable, if not invisible:
We look for the Great Wall of China. Although we can see things as small as airport runways, the Great Wall seems to be made largely of materials that have the same color as the surrounding soil. Despite persistent stories that it can be seen from the moon, the Great Wall is almost invisible from only 180 miles up!
sickrep wrote:Hey, in layers click on User-Supplied Collections, and then check webcams.
Fucking cool. Here's just the Los Angeles area. It's a little cluttered looking, but it still rules.
all what other jazz?dzjepp wrote:Well, it has a better interface, and it will probably receive more updates than worldwind (like more high-res cities) also it has a nice collection of user submitted spots for information like webcams and all that other jazz.
So the city would be Incirlik?Kammesennin wrote:anyone able to find Incirlik Elementary school in Turkey, or maybe the on-base housing development there. I'm trying to find that area because I lived there from when i was 4 to when i was 8, and might be visiting sometime soon, and I need to remember how to get places, and I'll only be able to figure it out from my old house which I could find from the school, or anywhere in the neighborhood. Any help would be much appreciated. *Still looking* Will post if I find it.
=odzjepp wrote:What the heck is this, looks like a stealth fighter imprint ;s
77°33'00.52"S, 59°00'49.27"W
BB King+JuggerNaut+ wrote:all what other jazz?dzjepp wrote:Well, it has a better interface, and it will probably receive more updates than worldwind (like more high-res cities) also it has a nice collection of user submitted spots for information like webcams and all that other jazz.