american fundamentalists - scary quotes
I'm purposfully ambiguous as to what I think a "nuclear disaster" entails. I know many people instantly think I mean some form of aggression, but it could be as simple as an *obviously* accidental explosion. I guess the purpose is to "get things rolling", but with positive outcomes, not nation-destroying nuclear consequences
I agree with Rush's thought, but without knowing the context his quote was placed in, it's impossible to know what he was thinking about. He's talking about the end, but doesn't mention the means
I agree with Rush's thought, but without knowing the context his quote was placed in, it's impossible to know what he was thinking about. He's talking about the end, but doesn't mention the means
[quote="Duhard"]To survive a war you gotta become the war...teammates are useless.[/quote]
[quote="SOAPboy"]You happen to be out of your league when it comes to games.. so fuck off..[/quote]
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]
I saw
the "Fist Signal" and
came runnin.
[/quote]
[quote="SOAPboy"]You happen to be out of your league when it comes to games.. so fuck off..[/quote]
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]
I saw
the "Fist Signal" and
came runnin.
[/quote]
Well I agree that's what it would take, but I wouldn't agree that it's possible for it to be a positive event if it does. In order to be a big enough deal to get people's attention, which would be the purpose of it, it would have to be big enough to cause massive destruction, and would put massive amounts of radiation into the atmosphere.Dave wrote:I'm purposfully ambiguous as to what I think a "nuclear disaster" entails. I know many people instantly think I mean some form of aggression, but it could be as simple as an *obviously* accidental explosion. I guess the purpose is to "get things rolling", but with positive outcomes, not nation-destroying nuclear consequences
I agree with Rush's thought, but without knowing the context his quote was placed in, it's impossible to know what he was thinking about. He's talking about the end, but doesn't mention the means
So it's pretty much a lose-lose.
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
I don't know Limbaugh's context either but from what I know of him (I've laughed at him since 1996) my guess would be that the US could end the threat of "rogue states" getting nukes by nuking them now to get rid of the threat entirely.Dave wrote:I'm purposfully ambiguous as to what I think a "nuclear disaster" entails. I know many people instantly think I mean some form of aggression, but it could be as simple as an *obviously* accidental explosion. I guess the purpose is to "get things rolling", but with positive outcomes, not nation-destroying nuclear consequences
I agree with Rush's thought, but without knowing the context his quote was placed in, it's impossible to know what he was thinking about. He's talking about the end, but doesn't mention the means
My guess is that he meant that only the US should have the chance to fire nukes.
You'd think people would get a hint of the danger they face by looking at what happened at Chernobyl.Dave wrote:You're misunderstanding me.. I didn't say use all of them. I say an accident or something needs to happen before people realize they need to be gotten rid of because people are ignorant or don't want to confront the realities.... just like I posted before
-
Freakaloin
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
The difference between the Chernobyl explosion and a Hiroshima level of blast being that the Chernobyl plant was mostly left standing afterwards. If a device outside of a major city accidently went off, the effects could potentially be unignorable. Just look at the paranoia people exibit over nuclear enegy today after Chernobyl and TMI. Who knows what public perception might be today if neither of those events occured.Transient wrote:You'd think people would get a hint of the danger they face by looking at what happened at Chernobyl.Dave wrote:You're misunderstanding me.. I didn't say use all of them. I say an accident or something needs to happen before people realize they need to be gotten rid of because people are ignorant or don't want to confront the realities.... just like I posted before
Last edited by Dave on Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'd make her swallow after fucking her in the ass... See if she likes the taste of her BUTT
[quote="Duhard"]To survive a war you gotta become the war...teammates are useless.[/quote]
[quote="SOAPboy"]You happen to be out of your league when it comes to games.. so fuck off..[/quote]
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]
I saw
the "Fist Signal" and
came runnin.
[/quote]
[quote="SOAPboy"]You happen to be out of your league when it comes to games.. so fuck off..[/quote]
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]
I saw
the "Fist Signal" and
came runnin.
[/quote]
-
Freakaloin
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
We need a population control event anyhow.Dave wrote:We could run around in circles all day talking about why I think a catastrophic accident is the only way to end nuclear proliferation, so it's not really worth discussing. As far as people pursuing them further, that came during the Cold War when nothing was off-limits militarily.
The only time we actually saw the human effects of nuclear weapons was at the end of WWII. Nukes today are far more destructive, yet people really can't comprehend what that means.
Only if we can find one that magically sucks in stupid people before exploding.tnf wrote:We need a population control event anyhow.Dave wrote:We could run around in circles all day talking about why I think a catastrophic accident is the only way to end nuclear proliferation, so it's not really worth discussing. As far as people pursuing them further, that came during the Cold War when nothing was off-limits militarily.
The only time we actually saw the human effects of nuclear weapons was at the end of WWII. Nukes today are far more destructive, yet people really can't comprehend what that means.
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
“Scientology is the only specific (cure) for radiation (atomic bomb) burns.”Dave wrote:The difference between the Chernobyl explosion and a Hiroshima level of blast being that the Chernobyl plant was mostly left standing afterwards. If a device outside of a major city accidently went off, the effects could potentially be unignorable. Just look at the paranoia people exibit over nuclear enegy today after Chernobyl and TMI. Who knows what public perception might be today if neither of those events occured.Transient wrote:You'd think people would get a hint of the danger they face by looking at what happened at Chernobyl.Dave wrote:You're misunderstanding me.. I didn't say use all of them. I say an accident or something needs to happen before people realize they need to be gotten rid of because people are ignorant or don't want to confront the realities.... just like I posted before
- L. Ron Hubbard, ALL ABOUT RADIATION, p. 109