Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 10:37 am
rep are you a professional fuckwit, or is it just a hobby you pursue with zeal?
Yeah. Take a good long look in the mirror rep because you're one of them.rep wrote:Notice how it's always the same bunch of destroyed individuals who try to talk shit on a forum thus proving to the world that their life is in absolute ruins.

:icon19: That's great.PhoeniX wrote:
No, it just shows a 'fraps' capture of some basement nerd googling 'elitetorrents dot org' browsing the movie collection, highlighting the date on the star wars III dvd rip, and opening it with videolan client. Then the fbi logo cuts in a second later.rep wrote:Here's some news: Apparently someone was recording video when the FBI and ICE stomped ass on the elitetorrents guys. It's now on the BT network, lol.
Winner. Piracy, stealing, and theft are all grossly innacurate substitutes for copyright infringement. It doesn't make it right, but I would argue it makes it "less wrong" than outright stealing. What's funny is if you think of the penalty for getting caught shoplifting a CD as opposed to getting caught downloading (I know, technically uploading) music. Which is worse, Petty theft or Copyright infringement and intellectual property thievery!inphlict wrote:I think stealing physical shit and numbers should be categorized differently, it’s not really stealing it’s copying.
yeah problem is, when you "steal it onilne" the charges are way worse.. if you get caught in a store, its nothing, you pay a small fine and do 5 hours community service.. but online they try to fine thse people for 1000s of dollars..rep wrote:But isn't it the same thing?
If you depend on the sales of your work to pay your debts, then how isn't stealing online wrong?
Just because someone took the movie and digitized it doesn't mean it's any different than going in the store and stealing the tape.
No, about 2 years ago I think I told drum he was so unfunny that he'd invent a negative laugh making people's lungs implode, FUCK YOU RYOKImjrpes wrote:haha... did you make that up yourself?Ryoki wrote:Rep, sometimes you are so unfunny i think my lungs may implode with anti laughter.
well it is actually. when someone steals a cd from a store, that means loss of potential sales for the store, and they have to replace it.rep wrote:But isn't it the same thing?
If you depend on the sales of your work to pay your debts, then how isn't stealing online wrong?
Just because someone took the movie and digitized it doesn't mean it's any different than going in the store and stealing the tape.
copied dvds are exactly the same as the originals nowadys. but i agree. its only $20 ffs. go out and buy it.tnf wrote:Why can't these cheap fucks just buy the shit?
I guess the quality of ripped (and by this I mean illegal copies of movies that are still in theatres..not DVD rips) movies must have improved, because the only ones I ever saw were from a couple years ago and looked like dogshit - even the ones my friend, who was some sort of SVCD whore, would tell me were just below DVD quality. Grainy, ugly shit.
I guess I can see the desire to download movies not out on DVD yet...but otherwise, just go buy the fucking thing.
Personally, i download things before i bite the cost of them.. to me, its cheaper to burn a 1.40 dvd and hate it and toss it, than it is to buy a 20$ dvd and trade it in..MKJ wrote:copied dvds are exactly the same as the originals nowadys. but i agree. its only $20 ffs. go out and buy it.tnf wrote:Why can't these cheap fucks just buy the shit?
I guess the quality of ripped (and by this I mean illegal copies of movies that are still in theatres..not DVD rips) movies must have improved, because the only ones I ever saw were from a couple years ago and looked like dogshit - even the ones my friend, who was some sort of SVCD whore, would tell me were just below DVD quality. Grainy, ugly shit.
I guess I can see the desire to download movies not out on DVD yet...but otherwise, just go buy the fucking thing.
ofcourse there are people that download 183 movies a day, which is undoubtetly cheaper than buying them all, but those people prolly dont watch those movies anyways. 'OMGLOL i downloaded another 1337 movie Babe goes to the city omglol rox0r"
agreed. do the sameSOAPboy wrote:Personally, i download things before i bite the cost of them.. to me, its cheaper to burn a 1.40 dvd and hate it and toss it, than it is to buy a 20$ dvd and trade it in..MKJ wrote:copied dvds are exactly the same as the originals nowadys. but i agree. its only $20 ffs. go out and buy it.tnf wrote:Why can't these cheap fucks just buy the shit?
I guess the quality of ripped (and by this I mean illegal copies of movies that are still in theatres..not DVD rips) movies must have improved, because the only ones I ever saw were from a couple years ago and looked like dogshit - even the ones my friend, who was some sort of SVCD whore, would tell me were just below DVD quality. Grainy, ugly shit.
I guess I can see the desire to download movies not out on DVD yet...but otherwise, just go buy the fucking thing.
ofcourse there are people that download 183 movies a day, which is undoubtetly cheaper than buying them all, but those people prolly dont watch those movies anyways. 'OMGLOL i downloaded another 1337 movie Babe goes to the city omglol rox0r"
sure i could go rent said dvd, theres 4.99 ffs..
i dunno.. im all about try before you buy..
BYOB is ghey. if you happen to like it, then you're no longer riding the fence, you're just queer.MKJ wrote:agreed. do the sameSOAPboy wrote:Personally, i download things before i bite the cost of them.. to me, its cheaper to burn a 1.40 dvd and hate it and toss it, than it is to buy a 20$ dvd and trade it in..MKJ wrote: copied dvds are exactly the same as the originals nowadys. but i agree. its only $20 ffs. go out and buy it.
ofcourse there are people that download 183 movies a day, which is undoubtetly cheaper than buying them all, but those people prolly dont watch those movies anyways. 'OMGLOL i downloaded another 1337 movie Babe goes to the city omglol rox0r"
sure i could go rent said dvd, theres 4.99 ffs..
i dunno.. im all about try before you buy..
download new SoaD (mostly before its out in the stores) - is it cool? ill buy it on release. if not then i wont
dunno. have Mesmerize on my hd here at work but still havent listend to it+JuggerNaut+ wrote:BYOB is ghey. if you happen to like it, then you're no longer riding the fence, you're just queer.MKJ wrote:agreed. do the sameSOAPboy wrote: Personally, i download things before i bite the cost of them.. to me, its cheaper to burn a 1.40 dvd and hate it and toss it, than it is to buy a 20$ dvd and trade it in..
sure i could go rent said dvd, theres 4.99 ffs..
i dunno.. im all about try before you buy..
download new SoaD (mostly before its out in the stores) - is it cool? ill buy it on release. if not then i wont
Theirs websites like vcd-q... that have ratings on how good the releases are, people rate them by video/audio and are nuked by the scene (the warez scene) if their no good. Generally cams aren't very good with tinny sound, but most of the time a telesync willbe released not long after the theare release which is a copy from the cinema rolls, i.e. very high quality. Theirs also screeners which are a copy of the dvd that gets sent to critics etc, it just has text over it at times like 'property of xxxxxxxx'', but software today can actually rip that out.tnf wrote:Why can't these cheap fucks just buy the shit?
I guess the quality of ripped (and by this I mean illegal copies of movies that are still in theatres..not DVD rips) movies must have improved, because the only ones I ever saw were from a couple years ago and looked like dogshit - even the ones my friend, who was some sort of SVCD whore, would tell me were just below DVD quality. Grainy, ugly shit.
I guess I can see the desire to download movies not out on DVD yet...but otherwise, just go buy the fucking thing.