Quake3World

According to that article they do and in the future they will get to have a choice in who they are with. Time marches on

shaft wrote:

lars63 wrote:Well, would you?

Anything is possible after a half bottle of 2012 produttori di barbaresco.

let it be known that on this day lars63 departed from his usual posting routine to ask everyone at Q3W if they would fuck a robot

can i also follow up my last post by saying that humanoid, autonomous robots are an extremely bad idea - not for the reason people usually give (they'll take over the world) but rather because the desire for such things to exist is the expression of a frustrated fascism on the part of some humans. it's the embodiment of that screeching inner child some people have that makes them wish people could be made - made - "better", and if tiresome obstacles like freedom and democracy get in the way, then so much the worse for them

and i'm not just talking about the obvious 20th century suspects either. there's also the check-your-privilege-and-remember-muh-pronouns morons to look out for as well

Which leads to an uprising and them taking over the world

PhoeniX wrote:Hmm do robots have a gender?

Do socks?

does your mum?

MKJ wrote:

PhoeniX wrote:Hmm do robots have a gender?

Do socks?

I have a couple pair of merino wool socks that have Left and Right on them. Does that count?

Wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of one once the honeymoon period is over and it's got the decorators in. Getting your face crushed because you want a pint with your mate would suck.

All these obstacles and all that was really needed was a yes or no (LOL)
Look on the bright side, no alimony, when you want a divorce just turn her off, same goes for arguments, there is always the off switch, who could ask for more?

haha lars n1 thread !

it is my opinion a person cant really have sex with a bot.

it is more of a whanking aid ey

think transient and his fleshlight for example.

lars, are you thinking of fucking a robot?

MKJ wrote:That's right Jerry. Any hole's a goal.

[lvlshot]http://i.imgur.com/gV6qwZT.jpg[/lvlshot]

Dat bitch is a legit psycho

xer0s wrote:lars, are you thinking of fucking a robot?

*LOL* I thought we had this question settled already, this is a question for the rest of the fine folk of Q3W and not for Lars, I'm 8 years out of practice anyway I might not know what to do,*grin*

I feel like you're dodging the question...

Dogging the robot

xer0s wrote:I feel like you're dodging the question...

The answer for Lars then is a emphatic no! Now, how about the rest you?

https://www.engadget.com/2016/12/23/int ... bots-2016/

Don't you start dissing Rosie now

Memphis wrote:Future Star Trekky hologram / artificial person technology that could provide a perfect polka-dot dressed clone of Shirley Manson from the Paranoid video? Would smash it all up the walls.

Today's creepy Thing-ish rubber-clad vacuum cleaner tech? An emphatic no

I want my next lady friend with bumps on the front, different plumbing than me and no motors, springs or wires, yep, a emphatic no

Memphis wrote:
Today's creepy Thing-ish rubber-clad vacuum cleaner tech? An emphatic no

[lvlshot]http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/20150715/5230005/officer-doofy-vacuum-o.gif[/lvlshot]

French woman wants to marry a robot

it begins

i have no words

that's mental illness, dignified as a 'valid life choice'

Robotic Kiss Transmitter

what's next, sticking your dick in the cell phone