Re: UK Elections
Posted: Fri May 08, 2015 10:05 pm
...just ask David.
Well he came into power through the backing of trade unions instead of business endorsements or banks and his 1st order of business was to attack the rags. That's something that pretty much every political leader gains support of before election time and puts them in their back pocket, Cameron went as far as apologising to Rebecca Brooks (the phone hacking scandal bitch) for showing a lack of support cos Ed had him on the run in the BSKYB takeover and when the trade unions started barking orders he told them to do one. I'm not saying he's squeaky clean but he wasn't at the mercy of anyone, even when the SNP tried placing him over a barrel with talk of a coalition he rejected it out of principal in maintaining the union, he refused an EU referendum and attracting the UKIPpers support because of his ideological stance and the damage it would do to the country.syp0s wrote:That's total speculation that you can't possibly prove. It's also likely completely wrong. Attaining leadership of a major political party and not owning favours at the end of it?losCHUNK wrote:
Ed also got to where he was without owing anyone any favours.
Ed doesn't seem a terrifically evil human being, but come on.. He's as dirty as everyone in Westminster, and he played by the same dirty rulebook as the rest of them.
so he tarred himself with the unelectable socialist brush, then attacked the idea of a free press and business interests all at oncelosCHUNK wrote:Well he came into power through the backing of trade unions instead of business endorsements or banks and his 1st order of business was to attack the rags.
uh, no. he rejected it because to do otherwise would have been stabbing scottish labour candidates/MPs in the backlosCHUNK wrote:even when the SNP tried placing him over a barrel with talk of a coalition he rejected it out of principal in maintaining the union
or rather, because he didn't trust the people to make the 'right' decision so fuck democracylosCHUNK wrote:he refused an EU referendum and attracting the UKIPpers support because of his ideological stance and the damage it would do to the country.
Well he went after Murdoch and deservedly so, cos David was up his arse and giving him what he wanted, he also wanted to place himself in a good position to recover the 35bn in tax avoidance from bankers and corps, cos David etc and as I said distanced himself from the trade unions when they made demands but they still offered their support.seremtan wrote:so he tarred himself with the unelectable socialist brush, then attacked the idea of a free press and business interests all at oncelosCHUNK wrote:Well he came into power through the backing of trade unions instead of business endorsements or banks and his 1st order of business was to attack the rags.
can't think why he wasn't elected...
uh, no. he rejected it because to do otherwise would have been stabbing scottish labour candidates/MPs in the backlosCHUNK wrote:even when the SNP tried placing him over a barrel with talk of a coalition he rejected it out of principal in maintaining the union
or rather, because he didn't trust the people to make the 'right' decision so fuck democracylosCHUNK wrote:he refused an EU referendum and attracting the UKIPpers support because of his ideological stance and the damage it would do to the country.
Heh this is half the reason I don't tend to get involved, I just don't understand it well enough but from what I do understand the election system just seems ridiculous. It's a shame we voted against proportionate representation, at least that would start making things a bit fairer. Though it's still unfair that if you win 30% of the votes you might not end up with 30% of the seats, the system just seems inherently broken but as long as your party is the one getting in then no wonder it doesn't get changed.syp0s wrote:It's definitely weird, I got laughed at on a job recently after admitting that I've only just understood how it works in the last few months. Even when you understand it, it still doesn't make any sense.
36% vs 30% ?PhoeniX wrote:
Not that it would make much different here- 52% went to conservatives, the next best was 23% to labour.
We have a winner. The UK we live in is full of people who have the biggest sense of self entitlement I have ever witnessed. The reward for laziness under Labour was staggering.syp0s wrote:Too many people in Britain think they should get maximum reward for minimum effort.
too right. the reason so many people are poor is because they didn't try hard enough to enter the world via the Duchess of Westminster's vaginasyp0s wrote:To get there all you have to do is make a concerted effort, just like every other rich person does.
Well maybe the right wing should mobilise ?, or do what they normally do and throw money at the problem til it goes away but the thing is Blair appealed to both right and leftDon Carlos wrote:Eh?
All these people having a go and protesting need to remember Blair got into government with 35% of the total vote
Africa could be the ext America if it just pulled its socks upseremtan wrote:too right. the reason so many people are poor is because they didn't try hard enough to enter the world via the Duchess of Westminster's vaginasyp0s wrote:To get there all you have to do is make a concerted effort, just like every other rich person does.
fucking lazy scum
Point taken - there are plenty who don't deserve itseremtan wrote:
too right. the reason so many people are poor is because they didn't try hard enough to enter the world via the Duchess of Westminster's vagina
fucking lazy scum
I've always voted Labour in every election I have been allowed to vote in. But this time I felt differently, I felt Ed was not the right man for the job. Cameron and his cronies have done a good job in steering the ship after Labour sailed us into a storm. Pleases remember the way Labour was going to deal with the crisis was to spend their way out. We are in more debt now than we have been for a long time, but we could have been in worse shape.losCHUNK wrote:Well maybe the right wing should mobilise ?, or do what they normally do and throw money at the problem til it goes away but the thing is Blair appealed to both right and leftDon Carlos wrote:Eh?
All these people having a go and protesting need to remember Blair got into government with 35% of the total vote
Reform has been on the cards for a long time n all, the welsh assembly was brought into power during the Blair era