Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:41 pm
by Doombrain
ToxicBug wrote:Damn I didn't know Kodak put digital backs into Canon SLR bodies.
they don't anymore, it's old.
Pete. you'll need to spend the money or you'll end up with a second best.
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:42 pm
by prince1000
that eos 1 prolly cost close to 10grand in like 97-98
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:44 pm
by prince1000
Doombrain wrote:ToxicBug wrote:Damn I didn't know Kodak put digital backs into Canon SLR bodies.
they don't anymore, it's old.
Pete. you'll need to spend the money or you'll end up with a second best.
i really know nothing about digital but SLR 35mm, canon or nikon only option, or contax (w/zeiss lenses) but they're pretty specialised, like leica in the rangefinder market.
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:45 pm
by Doombrain
pete wrote:Good day my friends.
Thanks for your participation.
I was wondering if I should consider the price of the lens also because of the difference in price from brands. I don't think that a Konica is as expensive as a Canon or a Nikon.
What do you think?
Minolta Konica Maxxum 7D.
Thanks
Pete
Same here as well. Again, you'll need to put up the cash to get the result
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 6:45 pm
by Guest
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/kodakdcs520/
Price (£9,995 without PC card or lens but including one battery.)
Not only Canon but Nikon also with Kodak.
They weight around 3.5 pounds without the battery.
USD29,995 list price DCS-560.
Pete