reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by EtUL »

bitWISE wrote:The data backs him up http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-leg ... d-sex.html

I'd be curious what percentage of visitors were underage themselves.
Did you read the link? All porn was banned previously. I'm gonna try to get a hold of the article.

What about the kids being used? How does a kid consent?

Could I use your kids?

Edit: Oh, it's actually linked, usually you gotta go thru school searches: http://www.springerlink.com/content/v04 ... ltext.html

Not sure I agree with their conclusions from the data, regardless, they conclude with:
We do not approve of the use of real children in the production or distribution of child pornography but artificially produced materials might serve. As it is, with restrictions on even materials for the scientific study of the phenomenon forbidden to all but police enforcement agencies, these real life studies are the only way to begin to understand the phenomenon. Unfortunately, we do not have a breakdown by age of the perpetrators or victims of sex abuse. With the new Czech Republic law against child pornography, however, analysis of findings over the next 5–10 years could show if this new prohibition against child pornography is correlated with an increase or decrease in sex crimes against children or without any noticeable effect.
Last edited by EtUL on Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

I jerk off to pictures of old men....jerking off to pictures of little boys.
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by brisk »

bitWISE wrote:The data backs him up http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-leg ... d-sex.html
wow bitwise wow
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by Transient »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:I jerk off to pictures of old men....jerking off to pictures of little boys.
Very meta.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by bitWISE »

EtUL wrote:
bitWISE wrote:The data backs him up http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-leg ... d-sex.html

I'd be curious what percentage of visitors were underage themselves.
Did you read the link? All porn was banned previously. I'm gonna try to get a hold of the article.

What about the kids being used? How does a kid consent?

Could I use your kids?

Edit: Oh, it's actually linked, usually you gotta go thru school searches: http://www.springerlink.com/content/v04 ... ltext.html

Not sure I agree with their conclusions from the data, regardless, they conclude with:
We do not approve of the use of real children in the production or distribution of child pornography but artificially produced materials might serve. As it is, with restrictions on even materials for the scientific study of the phenomenon forbidden to all but police enforcement agencies, these real life studies are the only way to begin to understand the phenomenon. Unfortunately, we do not have a breakdown by age of the perpetrators or victims of sex abuse. With the new Czech Republic law against child pornography, however, analysis of findings over the next 5–10 years could show if this new prohibition against child pornography is correlated with an increase or decrease in sex crimes against children or without any noticeable effect.
I skimmed over the part about all porn due to the misleading title. My bad.

I was thinking more along the lines of the legit pictures grifted off the web. The type of stuff on reddit. What this thread is about. I'm not trying to defend or support the actual porn and physical abuse of kids.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by Tsakali »

seremtan wrote:
Tsakali wrote:I much rather have them jerk off to a picture , and just use a paper towel for the finish, instead of having to lure a kid somewhere, and use a shovel for the finish. Let them self medicate with a picture, what's the big deal?
and where did the picture come from?

i see what you're getting at, but think it through you big greek dummy
they don't need professional pedo pictures, any picture would do.. I did think about the "supply and demand" argument, but seems to me that any good 'ol innocent picture would do...which seems to be somewhat of the subject matter in this thread?

I'm not saying that we should encourage them, but on the other hand lets not bring out the pitchforks and torches, when they are clearly just trying to get off in front of a computer screen.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

I jerk off to the Sears catalogue. The camping section gets me so hot.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by mrd »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:I jerk off to the Sears catalogue. The camping section gets me so hot.
stfu :olo:
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by Tsakali »

that was a totally true b4 internet. I've done it, but I can imagine how someone who has spanked on every summer wear coupon book he gets in the mail, might develop a more refined taste.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by bitWISE »

JC Penny's
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by feedback »

I think it was Louis CK who said "If pedophilia was more socially acceptable, pedophiles wouldn't have to kill kids after they diddle them. I'm just saying."
I love quake!
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by EtUL »

Don't you sick bastards get Victoria's Secret?

Snag it for a few days, then stick it back in the mail and no one's the wiser...
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Re: reddit decides maybe they shouldn't ignore child porn

Post by mjrpes »

Wonder what happened to teriba :question:
Post Reply