Snow Leopard Thread

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by plained »

i pretty satisfied going from 8.6 to 9 !

:D
it is about time!
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Deathshroud »

bitWISE wrote:I love my mac but I still hate those commercials.
Geebs wrote:Installing it on a MacBook air over my wireless network turned out to be basically impossible. On the other hand, it works perfectly well once installed, and I'm really not going to have a nerd strop about 64 bitness with only 2 gigs of physical ram.

Not even going to think about running the Mac Pro in 64 bit at this point as it'd break all of my recording hardware and with the speed with which audio companies update drivers, we'll be on 10.8 before anything's ready
Actually, OSX has entirely different memory issues when it comes to 32bit versus 64bit and stands to gain the most performance from the transition.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08 ... _bits.html

But I understand what you mean.
Yea, apparently OS X has been equipped with PAE for a while, but this is not really an optimal solution. 64-bit addressing provides a much more natural solution to allowing more memory within a system.

Oh and here is a very in depth review of SL, it covers bother everyday user and developer features.

http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/20 ... x-10-6.ars
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Geebs »

I'm surprised no one has seemed to remember that previous mac os update which trashed everything if it didn't like the way you punctuated your boot drive's name...

In other news, I just downgraded my girlfriend's constantly crashing vista box to XP and the thing has run perfectly ever since
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Doombrain »

don't forget to install rosetta, kids!
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by bitWISE »

Yea, I was prompted to install it for some Flex Builder (eclipse) extension I was using.

Geebs: I only just converted to the mac world last Decemeber. Before that I had barely touched one.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Tsakali »

Don Carlos wrote:img
you know, i still chuckle every time I see this image when I'm checking up on this thread...wtf i wrong with me
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Geebs »

Ok, so my reservations about SL and soundcard drivers were totally baseless - works absolutely fine. Of course, because I'm a nerd, it's installed on an SSD in my Mac Pro, in a quadruple-boot system with leopard, xp and 7....
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by saturn »

I installed Snow Leopard this saturday. Popped in the DVD, clicked install, let it run for 40 minutes and it was done without any interference. Everything works fine.....so basically it's a paid Leopard system upgrade..
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by obsidian »

Only program that I notice having problems is Quicksilver. I'm sure they're working on it (looks like they have a beta).
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by bitWISE »

Haven't noticed anything with quicksilver. The vmware fusion beta is really nice. Looks like the next version will have an upgraded interface, 64bit host, and true support for Windows 7.
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Deathshroud »

Some things to look forward to in 10.6.1

http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/ ... -works.ars
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Geebs »

bitWISE wrote:Haven't noticed anything with quicksilver. The vmware fusion beta is really nice. Looks like the next version will have an upgraded interface, 64bit host, and true support for Windows 7.
VMWare's great and all but it would be nice if they could have included the feature of not-making-windows-reactivate-every-time-you-upgrade-Fusion. Certain owners of perfectly legitimate copies of windows could have been forced to circumvent activation just to get the damn OS they bought to work...
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by bitWISE »

The vmware tools are supposed to prevent that. Like if you activate a bootcamp install, you have to load up the tools so you don't need to activate the vm.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Geebs »

I did, and it didn't help; I think XP was getting upset at changes in the emulated network adapter and video card. Fortunately, in this entirely hypothetical situation, bypassing activation completely solves all of the issues. Allegedly.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by Doombrain »

Anyone noticed the time jumping back after booting from mac to windows again? Pissing me off.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Snow Leopard Thread

Post by bitWISE »

Is that what causes that? I wondered why sometimes I had to reopen the Time/Date panel to get it to resync from the web.

Geebs: Sure does ;) An interesting note about Windows 7 is that there is a command you can run up to three time to extend the activation notice by another 30 days. I forget it though.
Post Reply