Your world is waiting...
https://quake3world.com/forum/
fuck u...Bdw3 wrote:Hubble does not have a 115m mirrior... :icon27:
Hubble has a 94.5-inch mirror.... That 2.4m
They do grow you fuckers dumb in Texas, don't they?Freakaloin wrote:ur a moron nightshade...
"Anything left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any Hubble image," According to the Space Telescope Science Institute, which operates Hubble for NASA. "It would just appear as a dot."
Nightshade wrote:This is incorrect. A telescope with enough resolution to see the things that the astronauts left would require a 115m diameter primary mirror.bitWISE wrote:My thoughts are that I don't really give a fuck whether or not the moon landing was staged.
However, to contradict your conclusion I have one good point. For a while now, people have been able to buy telescopes powerful enough to see the moon's surface. If there was anything shocking someone would have seen it...
Hey, don't lump the rest of us in with him.Nightshade wrote:They do grow you fuckers dumb in Texas, don't they?Freakaloin wrote:ur a moron nightshade...
"Anything left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any Hubble image," According to the Space Telescope Science Institute, which operates Hubble for NASA. "It would just appear as a dot."
Nightshade wrote: This is incorrect. A telescope with enough resolution to see the things that the astronauts left would require a 115m diameter primary mirror.
Yeah, they keep all those guys on the eastern side.Nightshade wrote:Oh come on. Geoof, Dubya, Jeb, and Bush, Sr. See a pattern?
hmm my telescope nerd radar seems to be going off...Nightshade wrote:This is incorrect. A telescope with enough resolution to see the things that the astronauts left would require a 115m diameter primary mirror.bitWISE wrote:My thoughts are that I don't really give a fuck whether or not the moon landing was staged.
However, to contradict your conclusion I have one good point. For a while now, people have been able to buy telescopes powerful enough to see the moon's surface. If there was anything shocking someone would have seen it...
"Lunar laser ranging is one of the most important tools we have for searching for flaws in Einstein's general theory of relativity," says Slava Turyshev, a research scientist at JPL who works with Jim Williams and others on the project.
Their experiment is possible because, more than 30 years ago, Apollo astronauts put mirrors on the Moon - small arrays of retro reflectors that can intercept laser beams from Earth and bounce them straight back. Using lasers and mirrors, researchers can "ping" the Moon and precisely monitor its motion around Earth.
I work for an optics company.zeeko wrote:hmm my telescope nerd radar seems to be going off...Nightshade wrote:This is incorrect. A telescope with enough resolution to see the things that the astronauts left would require a 115m diameter primary mirror.bitWISE wrote:My thoughts are that I don't really give a fuck whether or not the moon landing was staged.
However, to contradict your conclusion I have one good point. For a while now, people have been able to buy telescopes powerful enough to see the moon's surface. If there was anything shocking someone would have seen it...