If you've read "Angels and Demons" by Dan Brown, it's clear he's perfected his formula by the time he wrote The DaVinci Code. Still, it's an awesome book.
Canis wrote:If you've read "Angels and Demons" by Dan Brown, it's clear he's perfected his formula by the time he wrote The DaVinci Code. Still, it's an awesome book.
yeah they are somewhat simular in the plot but the content is definately different.
I'm sorry but Dan Brown's books are not that great. He focuses all of his attention to "plot" and has absolutely zero character development. He puts "facts" in his stories and connects them through completely rediculous speculations. Having said that though I suppose it is a style of fiction that appeals to a lot of people, I personally find it terrible however.
Jackal wrote:I'm sorry but Dan Brown's books are not that great. He focuses all of his attention to "plot" and has absolutely zero character development. He puts "facts" in his stories and connects them through completely rediculous speculations. Having said that though I suppose it is a style of fiction that appeals to a lot of people, I personally find it terrible however.
True. Also, the ending of the Da Vinci Code is ridiculous. You can tell he got lazy.
(Oh yeah and the "sacred feminine" did go on my nerves. He's obsessed with it, he used that term at least once per page.)