Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:44 pm
holy shit that's sicker than the horse fuckers.
Quake3World
Your world is waiting...
https://quake3world.com/forum/
zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:47 pm
For some reason, I think this is even more fucked up than sex with animals after reading part of that story.
edit: fuck you HM-tailpipeandstuff :icon33:
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:51 pm
Originally posted by dzjepp...
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:21 am
i am happy that my car is no ware near him... ffs.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:57 am
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:59 am
Fine, then let them marry a horse instead of a person. In a few generations the gene pool will be cleansed :icon26:theoneandonly wrote:my reasoning is that society is better off without people who are sexually attracted to animals. Furries, zoophiles, etc. are all mentally imbalanced people.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:09 am
wasent there a man in the southern states that married a Mare?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:26 am
Clinton?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:20 am
Are there any animals in nature that have sex with a different species?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:50 am
you never been dry humped by a dog before?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:04 am
you'd like to know which species are advertising?dzjepp wrote:Are there any animals in nature that have sex with a different species?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:05 am
in south africa, young male elephants have been raping rhinos for the last two decades. Don't know much about the details, but it doesn't seem consensual.dzjepp wrote:Are there any animals in nature that have sex with a different species?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:42 am
lol you eat horse meat?Foo wrote:Juls is right.
Also, lol, we fucking kill them and eat their flesh.....
...or were you referring to those people...
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:01 am
i think foo's point was this:Mogul wrote:lol you eat horse meat?Foo wrote:Juls is right.
Also, lol, we fucking kill them and eat their flesh.....
...or were you referring to those people...
some people argue that having sex with non human animals is wrong, because it can potentially interfere with the well being of the animal.
So, the argument is: bestiality is wrong because it harms the animal.
Foo pointed out that we fucking kill animals to eat them. So it's a bit hypocritical, since killing something is an ultimate form of harm.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:05 am
I was just being silly. 
But while we're on it, I kill and eat people.
But while we're on it, I kill and eat people.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:19 pm
you dont fuck them though, do you? :s
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:16 pm
Turns out yes http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... brids.htmldzjepp wrote:Are there any animals in nature that have sex with a different species?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:20 pm
Allow me to say 'mule' here for a second. Or 'rep'.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:26 pm
you raised a good question, should there be a minimum age for stalions as well? it's not so much a case of phyc damage, but more about the consent thing lol[xeno]Julios wrote:you may be on to something, but you still need to articulate a clear argument why bestiality should be outlawed.theoneandonly wrote: The fact is, anyone who wants to have sex with an animal has something very wrong happening in their head and I do not what to interact with a person like that. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FUCKING ANIMALS...don't spin this into close-mindedness of a new era like the 70s and 80s for faggots.
I don't give a shit about fags, I'm not talking about them.
edit: sexual liberation can go too far. Fucking and getting fucked by animals is too far. Anyone sexually attracted to animals should be gutted.
You have to say why it's going too far.
Comparing it to pedophilia is different - there are very good arguments to be made that the child involved in the relationship will incur psychological damage.
I don't think that is the case with a fully grown male stallion or a frisky dolphin.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:52 pm
Tsakali_ wrote: you raised a good question, should there be a minimum age for stalions as well? it's not so much a case of phyc damage, but more about the consent thing lol
[xeno]Julios wrote:
And yes, I strongly believe an animal can consent to such behaviour, especially when it's the one doing the fucking.
You don't need verbal articulation to understand certain things. When you interact with a dog or cat, say by providing it food, you don't need to hear it speak to understand that it's enjoying itself.
You'll find out very fast if the situation is non consensual.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:14 pm
heh but, but without the cognitive faculty's needed for such decision making... aww never mind you killed my joke
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:17 pm
there was a joke?
o.0
o.0
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:18 pm
and here comes Ami with the cane hook 
Re: zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:28 pm
Eh?dzjepp wrote:rofl. do you think that type of thing doesn't happen in real life?iambowelfish wrote:For serious? No. Do you think it should be illegal to believe anything?dzjepp wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3aRebr75fg
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:30 pm
surely rep isnt having sex with anyoneRyoki wrote:Allow me to say 'mule' here for a second. Or 'rep'.
or anything