holy shit that's sicker than the horse fuckers.
zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
-
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Originally posted by dzjepp...
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
you'd like to know which species are advertising?dzjepp wrote:Are there any animals in nature that have sex with a different species?
Last edited by Massive Quasars on Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
i think foo's point was this:Mogul wrote:lol you eat horse meat?Foo wrote:Juls is right.
Also, lol, we fucking kill them and eat their flesh.....
...or were you referring to those people...
some people argue that having sex with non human animals is wrong, because it can potentially interfere with the well being of the animal.
So, the argument is: bestiality is wrong because it harms the animal.
Foo pointed out that we fucking kill animals to eat them. So it's a bit hypocritical, since killing something is an ultimate form of harm.
Turns out yes http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... brids.htmldzjepp wrote:Are there any animals in nature that have sex with a different species?
you raised a good question, should there be a minimum age for stalions as well? it's not so much a case of phyc damage, but more about the consent thing lol[xeno]Julios wrote:you may be on to something, but you still need to articulate a clear argument why bestiality should be outlawed.theoneandonly wrote: The fact is, anyone who wants to have sex with an animal has something very wrong happening in their head and I do not what to interact with a person like that. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FUCKING ANIMALS...don't spin this into close-mindedness of a new era like the 70s and 80s for faggots.
I don't give a shit about fags, I'm not talking about them.
edit: sexual liberation can go too far. Fucking and getting fucked by animals is too far. Anyone sexually attracted to animals should be gutted.
You have to say why it's going too far.
Comparing it to pedophilia is different - there are very good arguments to be made that the child involved in the relationship will incur psychological damage.
I don't think that is the case with a fully grown male stallion or a frisky dolphin.
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
Tsakali_ wrote: you raised a good question, should there be a minimum age for stalions as well? it's not so much a case of phyc damage, but more about the consent thing lol
[xeno]Julios wrote:
And yes, I strongly believe an animal can consent to such behaviour, especially when it's the one doing the fucking.
You don't need verbal articulation to understand certain things. When you interact with a dog or cat, say by providing it food, you don't need to hear it speak to understand that it's enjoying itself.
You'll find out very fast if the situation is non consensual.
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Re: zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
Eh?dzjepp wrote:rofl. do you think that type of thing doesn't happen in real life?iambowelfish wrote:For serious? No. Do you think it should be illegal to believe anything?dzjepp wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3aRebr75fg
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
[url=http://www.cafepress.com/stool][img]http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1561/smallstool4td.jpg[/img][/url]