new tsunami to hit Asia?

Post by **dmmh** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:50 pm

R00k wrote:
dmmh wrote:on the same vault to be precise. watsowned
fault to be precise. cinemasiowned.

spelling jokes, so 1990's

Post by **Duhard** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:50 pm

dmmh wrote:http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=619936

gg

good news...I can't wait!

Post by **losCHUNK** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:58 pm

R00k wrote:"Small" tsunami detected:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/0 ... index.html

he agency said no major tsunami has been observed near epicenter of the earthquake which was upgraded from a magnitude of 8.2 to 8.7. An aftershock measuring 6.0 struck 30 minutes after the initial quake.

the big 1 was like 9.0 ? causing this huge wave killing hundreds of millions..... and that thing hardly makes a dent ?

Post by **Fender** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:01 pm

It depends on how the energy was released. IIRC, the one in Decemeber caused the seafloor to lurch quite a bit and quiet suddenly. This one lasted over two minutes and must not have caused the seafloor to move as much. They also think it released its energy in a different direction.

Post by **Duhard** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:04 pm

...sounds like no tidal wave has been found so there won't be any tsunamis this time...maybe next time...too bad.

Post by **losCHUNK** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:04 pm

Fender wrote:It depends on how the energy was released. IIRC, the one in Decemeber caused the seafloor to lurch quite a bit and quiet suddenly. This one lasted over two minutes and must not have caused the seafloor to move as much. They also think it released its energy in a different direction.

ahh, thought it would be something like that just didnt expect it to reduce its destructive force by so much

Post by **Giraffe }{unter** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:18 pm

Fender wrote:
Amen. Sig free here as well.

:icon30:

dmmh wrote:my sig owns u noobs

Sorry cannot see it, must be bllocked :icon30:

new tsunami to hit Asia?

Re: new tsunami to hit Asia?