Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:46 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:SOAPboy wrote:stuff i wrote
but the Ngage STILL manages to look bulky and undeniably ugly beyond comprehension. no amount of features can overcome
that.
and remind me again how much that was when it first came out?
50bucks.. all i paid..
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:47 am
by SOAPboy
Dr_Watson wrote:
nice jailhouse tats.
Thanks... i guess.. did em in math class when i was in 10th grade.
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Meh.. Try harder..
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:18 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
SOAPboy wrote:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:SOAPboy wrote:stuff i wrote
but the Ngage STILL manages to look bulky and undeniably ugly beyond comprehension. no amount of features can overcome
that.
and remind me again how much that was when it first came out?
50bucks.. all i paid..
you're whining about $250 being too much or a PSP. i didn't ask you how much YOU paid for an Ngage, i asked you how much it was when it debuted.
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:54 pm
by stocktroll
am i the only gamer completely apathetic to handhelds?
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:01 pm
by Foo
Probably not. It depends on your situation. If you commute to work or generally travel on public transport then you can probably imagine playing games on the bus/train.
Otherwise, there aren't many situations where mobile gaming is practical.
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:08 pm
by mik0rs
stocktroll wrote:am i the only gamer completely apathetic to handhelds?
Nah, I'm not entirely that bothered. Not apathetic as such, but having had a Game Gear and a Gameboy I've had about 5 games for them both in total.
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:08 pm
by Dr_Watson
SOAPboy wrote:Dr_Watson wrote:
nice jailhouse tats.
Thanks... i guess.. did em in math class when i was in 10th grade.
that wasn't really a compliment.
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:48 pm
by Tormentius
stocktroll wrote:am i the only gamer completely apathetic to handhelds?
Nope, you're not the only one. It may work for many people but personally I'd never get around to playing a portable.
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:19 pm
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:SOAPboy wrote:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
but the Ngage STILL manages to look bulky and undeniably ugly beyond comprehension. no amount of features can overcome that.
and remind me again how much that was when it first came out?
50bucks.. all i paid..
you're whining about $250 being too much or a PSP. i didn't ask you how much YOU paid for an Ngage, i asked you how much it was when it debuted.
dont matter how much it was when it came out.. it effected me none.
250$ for a fucking handheld, is TO MUCH..
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:08 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
SOAPboy wrote:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:SOAPboy wrote:
50bucks.. all i paid..
you're whining about $250 being too much or a PSP. i didn't ask you how much YOU paid for an Ngage, i asked you how much it was when it debuted.
dont matter how much it was when it came out.. it effected me none.
250$ for a fucking handheld, is TO MUCH..
lol and $299 upon release of the Ngage is not "too much"?
nice "phone" lol
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:02 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:SOAPboy wrote:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
you're whining about $250 being too much or a PSP. i didn't ask you how much YOU paid for an Ngage, i asked you how much it was when it debuted.
dont matter how much it was when it came out.. it effected me none.
250$ for a fucking handheld, is TO MUCH..
lol and $299 upon release of the Ngage is not "too much"?
nice "phone" lol
Did i say it wasent to much?
didnt think so fag..
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:04 am
by +JuggerNaut+
nope, you're just bitching like a little whore about the PSP's price when your precious little NGage was truly a f*cking rip-off when it first debuted.
p.s.
fag.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:05 am
by losCHUNK
ang on
someone bought one on release price ? :icon19:
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:59 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:nope, you're just bitching like a little whore about the PSP's price when your precious little NGage was truly a f*cking rip-off when it first debuted.
p.s.
fag.
Again you bitch ass trick, me bitching about the PSPs price, has NOTHING to do with my ngage.. im not stupid enough to pay 250 bucks for a half ass video game console..
Fag
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:11 am
by +JuggerNaut+
"bitch ass trick"
:icon19:
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:16 am
by +JuggerNaut+
SOAPboy wrote:im not stupid enough to pay 250 bucks for a half ass video game console..
no, but you're dumb enough to buy one in the first place and actually use it as a phone.

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:19 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:SOAPboy wrote:im not stupid enough to pay 250 bucks for a half ass video game console..
no, but you're dumb enough to buy one in the first place and actually use it as a phone.

and? its a NICE phone.. i dont actually use the phone part to talk tho, hense the WIRELESS HEADSET..
Jesus your stupid
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:20 am
by +JuggerNaut+
it was a f*cking failure and you know it.
fag.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:22 am
by +JuggerNaut+
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:29 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:it was a f*cking failure and you know it.
fag.
As a GAMING device, it was a failure.
As a PHONE its great..
if you actually owned one, your opinion on them wouldnt be so shitty..
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:34 am
by +JuggerNaut+
i sincerely hope you're joking.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:37 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:i sincerely hope you're joking.
no im dead serious.. Sidetalking, sucks.. i admit that.. but do you have any idea how many fucking options it has?
Look, i have my NES emulators on it, IRC, Aim, Yim, MSN, and it runs ANYTHING java, and samba apps.. it ALSO has bluetooth, while thats nothing "new" it makes the whole side talking thing go away..
Its also a MP3 player, its also a Video player..
for a PHONE, with some "neat" options.. it fucking OWNS.. i wouldnt say its a 5 star phone, id give it a 3.5 or so.. but still for what I PAID its totally worth it.. AND you can pick them up anymore for 50ish anywhere..
ALSO, it has some of the best reception for a cell that ive seen.. and its durible as fuck..
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:50 am
by +JuggerNaut+
do you drive?
i wouldn't get ANY use out of such a device with all that stuff on it unless i took public transportation, since that's the only place i'd WANT to use it for those other "options".
how can you play ANY games on it OR watch any video considering isn't the screen situated VERTICALLY? who's to blame for that? twice as tall as it is wide? for a top down old school shootem up that's fine, but it's gotta suck for everything else.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:53 am
by SOAPboy
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:do you drive?
i wouldn't get ANY use out of such a device with all that stuff on it unless i took public transportation, since that's the only place i'd WANT to use it for those other "options".
how can you play ANY games on it OR watch any video considering isn't the screen situated VERTICALLY? who's to blame for that? twice as tall as it is wide? for a top down old school shootem up that's fine, but it's gotta suck for everything else.
MP3s, i USED to use it using the input on my headunit in my car..
Video, great for little "giggle" clips.. nothing like a whole movie, but just stupid shit like some guy getting kicked in the balls or something..
and honestly, theres a "few" games, that arnt half bad.. not great games, but great for a plane ride..
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:06 am
by saturn
rofl, hilarious how soapboy's defending one of the biggest failures in communication/gaming history.
