Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:38 pm
by Guest
I like it.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:42 pm
by Kills On Site
Well the new Lamborghini looks ok, a different, exotic, color would make it look better. Nice HP, 100/liter. As for the new, slightly faster, Shelby I think looks like a really ugly Cobra. I bet the Shelby is cheaper, and that is its save.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 pm
by Guest
I think the new shelby is sex on wheels too and I'd buy that over the lambo, but only because I've always been a HUGE and I mean HUGE fan of the 64 Shelby Cobra, which is of course the original design which inspired that one.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:11 pm
by bitWISE
I like the Lambo better but I would drive them both in a heartbeat.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:20 pm
by Canidae
Nightshade wrote:Batmobile. :lol:
Not only that but you can't get a BJ while driving. What were the designers thinking?

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:35 pm
by R00k
That lambo looks ridiculous.

The Shelby is pure sex.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:41 pm
by bitWISE
Canidae wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Batmobile. :lol:
Not only that but you can't get a BJ while driving. What were the designers thinking?
The fact that you don't get enough ass isn't the concern of the Lambo designers.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:00 pm
by Guest
bitWISE wrote:
Canidae wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Batmobile. :lol:
Not only that but you can't get a BJ while driving. What were the designers thinking?
The fact that you don't get enough ass isn't the concern of the Lambo designers.
Well if you think about it, it should be. I mean what's the point of building a fast car? The only reason fast cars were built in the first place were so men could compete. Something men have done since the dawn of mankind. The reason we compete is because as a race we pass on our genes and since the ones that competition determins in many species on earth who gets to mate, it's naturaly an evolution of this need to fuck, that we want to drive faster cars. :icon26:

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:12 pm
by R00k
You make it so easy to rail on you karcus.

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:59 pm
by Guest
Fuck man have a sense of humor, it's a fucking internet messageboard. The reason I think you lot are so fucking stupid is you can't tell the difference between joking around and when I'm serious. It makes you look like a dull cunt.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:03 am
by R00k
Your antiseptic theory on what drives men makes two things clear -- one, that you apparently aren't a man; and two, that you're the one without a sense of humor. lol

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:06 am
by Guest
Ok there, hold your pawns in check there mr chess man I don't think I can take much more verbal abuse from a fucking nerd today.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:10 am
by Fender
Kracus wrote:Ok there, hold your pawns in check there mr chess man I don't think I can take much more verbal abuse from a fucking nerd today.
That was almost really clever.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:12 am
by Canidae
Kracus wrote:
bitWISE wrote:
Canidae wrote: Not only that but you can't get a BJ while driving. What were the designers thinking?
The fact that you don't get enough ass isn't the concern of the Lambo designers.
Well if you think about it, it should be. I mean what's the point of building a fast car? The only reason fast cars were built in the first place were so men could compete. Something men have done since the dawn of mankind. The reason we compete is because as a race we pass on our genes and since the ones that competition determins in many species on earth who gets to mate, it's naturaly an evolution of this need to fuck, that we want to drive faster cars. :icon26:
This doen't explain why Ben Johnson has no kids but has owned many exotic cars

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:13 am
by Guest
Steroids, make your dick limp kids.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:47 am
by R00k
Fender wrote:
Kracus wrote:Ok there, hold your pawns in check there mr chess man I don't think I can take much more verbal abuse from a fucking nerd today.
That was almost really clever.
No kidding. I could tell there was a train of thought somewhere in the post, it just seems like it got derailed by some kind of self-rumination about cocaine parties there towards the end.

Nice karcus, keep working on that. :icon14:

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:11 am
by Guest
I don't do cocaine fuckhead, but keep making stupid assumptions.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:54 am
by zeeko
this is all i heard krakus.. "cry! whine! bitch bitch bitch!"

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:54 am
by zeeko
Kracus wrote:Fuck man have a sense of humor, it's a fucking internet messageboard. The reason I think you lot are so fucking stupid is you can't tell the difference between joking around and when I'm serious. It makes you look like a dull cunt.
:icon19:

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:56 am
by denzii
That lambo looks like shit

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:53 am
by bitWISE
Kracus wrote:
bitWISE wrote:
Canidae wrote: Not only that but you can't get a BJ while driving. What were the designers thinking?
The fact that you don't get enough ass isn't the concern of the Lambo designers.
Well if you think about it, it should be. I mean what's the point of building a fast car? The only reason fast cars were built in the first place were so men could compete. Something men have done since the dawn of mankind. The reason we compete is because as a race we pass on our genes and since the ones that competition determins in many species on earth who gets to mate, it's naturaly an evolution of this need to fuck, that we want to drive faster cars. :icon26:
I'm not making a reference to the fact that a Lambo would get you laid. What I was trying to say is that after you have enough sex it isn't the greatest thing in the world. If I were driving a Lambo I would be having an orgasm from the sheer thrill. Fuck having a girl in the car; her weight would slow you down and she would spend the whole time bitching about how you need to drive more carefully.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:41 am
by +JuggerNaut+
R00k wrote:That lambo looks ridiculous.

The Shelby is pure sex.
i concur.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:14 pm
by Nightshade
I have to say that I haven't seen an inspiring Lambo design in quite some time. The Diablo VT was the last car that gave me car-wood.
I'm rather unimpressed with nost car designs these days...taken a gander at the new BMW's? *barf*
I'll admit that I like the new Mustang, because it's almost an exact copy of an older design. Same with the new Ford GT.
I'd be remiss if I didn't mention Aston-Martin's recent efforts. Mmmmm, Vanquish.
Most all else...*yawn*

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:28 pm
by U4EA
Lamborghini is now VW owned innit? I read an article a while back about how the fiery Italian passion is gone having been replaced with solid yet boring German precision engineering.

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:43 pm
by inphlict
Looks good, I'm noticing a new trend with cars no more smooth body, it's like they take a boxy car and cut of the angles.