Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 8:12 pm
Doesn't that serious black line sharpening around the wings bother you?
Dave wrote:Doesn't that serious black line sharpening around the wings bother you?
I think they're pretty stupid too, who cares about some fucking bolt? Dolt.Doombrain wrote:Macro shots? Who died and made you the god boss of what does what doesn't make a good photo?
no one cares about your thoughts. don't you know this yet?Kracus wrote:I think they're pretty stupid too, who cares about some fucking bolt? Dolt.Doombrain wrote:Macro shots? Who died and made you the god boss of what does what doesn't make a good photo?
Noted, you don't like macro and you're a little anal about people posting images.Memphis wrote:Noone did. I'm the guy that doesn't care about it. The kinda guy someone specialising in a medium should be out to impress without any jargonistic photogronerd crap about what lighting or lens used, but simply a striking image. You think music is made just for other musicians to listen to?Doombrain wrote:Macro shots? Who died and made you the god boss of what does what doesn't make a good photo?
Thought you were fucking off?Kracus wrote:Doomy's the kinda guy we used to call a john back in the day when I used to race mountainbikes.
A john, is a guy, with an extremely nice bike, that only owns it to show it off, because on the track, john sucks and no matter how good of a bike he get's he'll never be good enough to compete. Doomy strikes me as the type.
lolplained wrote:Dave wrote:Doesn't that serious black line sharpening around the wings bother you?
hey like thats a shadow man .
shit i did upset you .
I'll be gone on thursday.Doombrain wrote:Thought you were fucking off?Kracus wrote:Doomy's the kinda guy we used to call a john back in the day when I used to race mountainbikes.
A john, is a guy, with an extremely nice bike, that only owns it to show it off, because on the track, john sucks and no matter how good of a bike he get's he'll never be good enough to compete. Doomy strikes me as the type.
i'm gladKracus wrote:When it comes to you, so am I.
he takes good pics man, cant deny that!Kracus wrote:Doomy's the kinda guy we used to call a john back in the day when I used to race mountainbikes.
A john, is a guy, with an extremely nice bike, that only owns it to show it off, because on the track, john sucks and no matter how good of a bike he get's he'll never be good enough to compete. Doomy strikes me as the type.
yeah but, bikes and stuff. competing, good enough?? blahDon Carlos wrote:he takes good pics man, cant deny that!Kracus wrote:Doomy's the kinda guy we used to call a john back in the day when I used to race mountainbikes.
A john, is a guy, with an extremely nice bike, that only owns it to show it off, because on the track, john sucks and no matter how good of a bike he get's he'll never be good enough to compete. Doomy strikes me as the type.
lol, hark at you, you fucking idiot. Class us up some 'professional photography' you fucking big headed wankerMemphis wrote:Hope that note was in pencil. I also hope you do understand that only someone with any real talent in their chosen field can bring the fruits of that talent to the masses and not just to the other 5 people they know that own an expensive camera and think they can do professional photography.Doombrain wrote:Noted, you don't like macro and you're a little anal about people posting images.Memphis wrote: Noone did. I'm the guy that doesn't care about it. The kinda guy someone specialising in a medium should be out to impress without any jargonistic photogronerd crap about what lighting or lens used, but simply a striking image. You think music is made just for other musicians to listen to?
No offense Memphis, but where did DB say that he was producing professional photography? Like a lot of people on the internet, the majority of photography is just about sharing the moment/experience with someone, or something which he or she is proud of. It needn't be the greatest shot in the world, but it can still be expressive.Memphis wrote:Hope that note was in pencil. I also hope you do understand that only someone with any real talent in their chosen field can bring the fruits of that talent to the masses and not just to the other 5 people they know that own an expensive camera and think they can do professional photography.Doombrain wrote:Noted, you don't like macro and you're a little anal about people posting images.Memphis wrote: Noone did. I'm the guy that doesn't care about it. The kinda guy someone specialising in a medium should be out to impress without any jargonistic photogronerd crap about what lighting or lens used, but simply a striking image. You think music is made just for other musicians to listen to?
brisk wrote:No offense Memphis, but where did DB say that he was producing professional photography? Like a lot of people on the internet, the majority of photography is just about sharing the moment/experience with someone, or something which he or she is proud of. It needn't be the greatest shot in the world, but it can still be expressive.Memphis wrote:Hope that note was in pencil. I also hope you do understand that only someone with any real talent in their chosen field can bring the fruits of that talent to the masses and not just to the other 5 people they know that own an expensive camera and think they can do professional photography.Doombrain wrote: Noted, you don't like macro and you're a little anal about people posting images.
Relax a bit man, its all just a bit of fun really
Oh Lord it's a fad. Go crazy about it.Memphis wrote:What's with the absurd number of close focus pics people keep churning out in an effort to be recognised as a competant photographer?
Photography is about capturing a striking, interesting and eye pleasing image is it not? Noone's gonna go, ooooooh look at that bolt. Or christ Sheila will you catch a load of this pebble!
There's enough people out there snapping any old shit with a decent cam and calling it gold. Get an eye for an interesting shot, not just a well focused one.