Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:45 pm
60 hz monitor rate??? 
Which makes me wonder... either the stats on LCD/CRT are wrong (LCD being 60Hz by default) or many more people than I ever thought are oblivious to the wonderful benefits of running at a higher Hz.Pext wrote:60 hz monitor rate???
You know, there are still a ton of people that are just the 'turn on pc, start game' variety, meaning they only tinker with a minimum amount of techical whizbang, just enough to get by.mjrpes wrote:Which makes me wonder... either the stats on LCD/CRT are wrong (LCD being 60Hz by default) or many more people than I ever thought are oblivious to the wonderful benefits of running at a higher Hz.Pext wrote:60 hz monitor rate???
This is people that Opted to actually take the Survay, it prompts you..PhoeniX wrote:Only 114 people have 2gb of ram? Supprising.
And I stil use a CRT, an LCD would be nice for space reasons but the CRT is good quality wise.
Point.Foo wrote:That's a goldmine for backing up a few of the common debates coming up lately, like the 'why do some games companies still ship on CDRom?'
Drive Type
Undetermined: 5,395 1.26 %
CD-Rom: 28,949 6.76 %
DVD: 393,945 91.98 %
Answer: Because they're foolish.
I think the simplest explaination for that is that ATI's solution has come far later to market and there's a lot less boards out there for it. At least at the moment.dzjepp wrote:I think one can gauge a general idea on the types of specs people run on a variety of games, not just Steam (in a sense that the people that play on Steam, probably play a ton of other games too). For instance you can see that Nvidia is crushing Ati with their dual core chips. 3000+ Nvidia sli users vs. 50+ Ati crossfire users... I bet this stat is similar across other games too. Shad care to defend Ati on this one?
sli has been around quite a bit longer than crossfire. really though who cares about sli/crossfire. i have a hard time keeping 1 high budget card in my comp never mind two.dzjepp wrote:I think one can gauge a general idea on the types of specs people run on a variety of games, not just Steam (in a sense that the people that play on Steam, probably play a ton of other games too). For instance you can see that Nvidia is crushing Ati with their dual core chips. 3000+ Nvidia sli users vs. 50+ Ati crossfire users... I bet this stat is similar across other games too. Shad care to defend Ati on this one?
When I looked at the average amount of RAM, free disc space, and refresh rate, my conclusion was that the average gamer is still one of two things:mjrpes wrote:Which makes me wonder... either the stats on LCD/CRT are wrong (LCD being 60Hz by default) or many more people than I ever thought are oblivious to the wonderful benefits of running at a higher Hz.Pext wrote:60 hz monitor rate???