Page 2 of 4

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:09 pm
by Dek
nah its some cheap little zoo here in tampa, lowry park zoo..

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM telephoto zoom lens .. not sure I'm still kinda new to the camera stuff still.. not sure what DO one

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:10 pm
by andyman
Dek wrote:nah its some cheap little zoo here in tampa, lowry park zoo..

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM telephoto zoom lens .. not sure I'm still kinda new to the camera stuff still.. not sure what DO one
where in tampa do you live.... i'm right by Macdill

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:11 pm
by mjrpes
Here's some picture of monkeys I took at the San Diego zoo (70-300mm DO IS etc) ... it was late in the day so it was all shadowy.

Image

Image

Image

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:12 pm
by mjrpes
Dek wrote:nah its some cheap little zoo here in tampa, lowry park zoo..

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM telephoto zoom lens .. not sure I'm still kinda new to the camera stuff still.. not sure what DO one
It's this thing

http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/70-300do/

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:12 pm
by Dave
lols.. nice file name on the first one


oh, and I found out that if you apply a high contrast USM to the DO pics, you get much better detail.. just do a USM in PS with 20%, 50 px and 0 threshold

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:13 pm
by mjrpes
Dave wrote:lols.. nice file name on the first one
heh... i didn't think you people would be so quick :D

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:15 pm
by tnf
wait a minute...if we evolved from monkeys and apes, why are there monkeys and apes in those pics?


nice shots, btw.

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:16 pm
by Dave
andyman wrote:
Dave wrote:
mjrpes wrote:Is this San Diego zoo?

And when you say you use the 70-300mm lens, are you talking about the DO one?
He's got the normal one.. i have the DO

Something about these pics makes me want to turn them into some grainy B&W things
42copy7sx.jpg[/img]
that takes away from the intricacy of the bird...
Maybe.. but it depends on if you're looking at the bird as just a bird, or if you're trying to imagine some meaning behind the bird

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:20 pm
by lars63
Parrot and Eagle look the best to me but all look good.

If you enjoy the pictures you take and have fun doing it that's all that matters


*Nikon coolpix885 is what I use*

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:28 pm
by Dek
I live in Brandon... heres a few more pics of the eagle..

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:31 pm
by andyman
that is a badass eagle..

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:34 pm
by mjrpes
Dave wrote:
oh, and I found out that if you apply a high contrast USM to the DO pics, you get much better detail.. just do a USM in PS with 20%, 50 px and 0 threshold
yeah... amazing what USM can do.

i sometimes do a two process USM. First a low percentage and high pixel (maybe a 20%, 50px like you did) pass, then a high percentage and low pixel pass (say 170%, 0.5px). The first pass acts like a contrast, and the second makes the edges crisp.

So my monkey pic turns into...

Image

only problem is it brings out the noise.

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:34 pm
by mjrpes
eagle pics are awesome... well done.

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:37 pm
by Dave
That USM trick usually works a lot better than the normal contrast adjusting methods, but it can do some crazy shit to your pictures

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:39 pm
by Dek
i'll have to mess around with usm.. a bit

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:46 pm
by brisk
mjrpes wrote:
Dave wrote:
oh, and I found out that if you apply a high contrast USM to the DO pics, you get much better detail.. just do a USM in PS with 20%, 50 px and 0 threshold
yeah... amazing what USM can do.

i sometimes do a two process USM. First a low percentage and high pixel (maybe a 20%, 50px like you did) pass, then a high percentage and low pixel pass (say 170%, 0.5px). The first pass acts like a contrast, and the second makes the edges crisp.

So my monkey pic turns into...

Image

only problem is it brings out the noise.
and thats a nice pic!

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:47 am
by Dek
here's a pic of a ring tailed lemur...

Image

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:52 am
by Nightshade
LOL!

"WHAT?!?! I wasn't licking my balls!"

Nice shots Dek. Very crisp.

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:42 am
by ForM
Like the shots.

Liked Daves Black and white ones in the other thread but didnt care for the color ones.

Sometimes Life needs to be captured in diffrent mediams to achive full effect, if you will.

Thx for shareing.

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:05 am
by Dukester
These photo threads are very cool. on 56 ghey it does take a lot of patience to see them, but so far they have been worth it!

I really liked Dave's pics and these are good too.

I took a lot of zoo pics back in 80-82 with my AE-1 and they never came out as crisp as yours look. I know it could be done, but I couldn't get that quality. Also zoos have become, I think, more photo freindly than they were 25 years ago.

If I get a chance I'll post some pics I took at the Dallas zoo in 1980, during a typical hot crappy Texas summer.

Good work Dek! Post more.
Dave too! Make a deal with the Iowa drill team :)

Nice pics Dek!

Re: zoo pics with new cam 56 ghey warning

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:12 am
by Freakaloin
Dek wrote:

Image

what a whore...

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:36 am
by Dukester
She reminds me of that slurpee drinking chick on squidbillies :)

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:19 am
by Dave
ForM wrote:Like the shots.

Liked Daves Black and white ones in the other thread but didnt care for the color ones.

Sometimes Life needs to be captured in diffrent mediams to achive full effect, if you will.

Thx for shareing.
heh. thx. i didn't convert dekard's eagle to B&W because I thought it was bad in color.. i converted it to B&W because I have a thing for B&W :icon25:

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:25 am
by ForM
The conversion of the b/w eagele was shit imho.

But the row team and the the car was super.


Sometimes ya have to keep things simple.

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:26 am
by Dave
why was it shit? I mean it's one thing to critique something and another to call it shit.