Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:46 pm
but it was evening - maybe without flash the photo woulda turned out all dark n shit...
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:48 pm
Yeah, that flash lit up the sky...
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:16 pm
For some really weird reason i see each car in that pic sayin "Yeeaahh, what you fookin` looking at" 
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:30 pm
Chupacabra wrote:i actually found the picture slighly amusing
im easily entertained.
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:24 pm
yeah, i know
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:09 am
lol[xeno]Julios wrote:but it was evening - maybe without flash the photo woulda turned out all dark n shit...
it was probably an automatic camera, with auto mode on.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:41 am
Super shitty weather today. Not good for snowboarding at Mt. Centenial.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 am
ToxicBug: Retard meets messageboard.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:50 am
Take it easy with the Mt. bullshit.Turbine wrote:Super shitty weather today. Not good for snowboarding at Mt. Centenial.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:52 am
Doombrain wrote:Yeah, that flash lit up the sky...
Re: BMW meets BMW
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:59 am
ToxicBug wrote:Happened in Toronto.
...happened in the neighbors back yard...
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:35 am
eh?ToxicBug wrote:lol[xeno]Julios wrote:but it was evening - maybe without flash the photo woulda turned out all dark n shit...
it was probably an automatic camera, with auto mode on.
i thought u took the pic - guess not.
but why wouldn't you want flash?
or lemme ask this:
when WOULD you want flash?
I'm utter newb in camera so please give me an answer that'll educate me.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:58 am
you're asking a wrong person, he is a newb also.Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:47 am
if its an onboard flash, you should never use it because pics will look like shit. use a higher iso if theres low light or buy an external flash an bounce it off the ceiling.[xeno]Julios wrote:eh?ToxicBug wrote:lol[xeno]Julios wrote:but it was evening - maybe without flash the photo woulda turned out all dark n shit...
it was probably an automatic camera, with auto mode on.
i thought u took the pic - guess not.
but why wouldn't you want flash?
or lemme ask this:
when WOULD you want flash?
I'm utter newb in camera so please give me an answer that'll educate me.
btw it wasnt my pic and i dont like in toronto lol
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:30 am
ic - tx.
i'm looking back on the original photo - and it doesn't look washed out, or like shit, but this may just be my untrained eye.
i'm looking back on the original photo - and it doesn't look washed out, or like shit, but this may just be my untrained eye.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:31 am
My guess is that they are talking about the stop sign, which is probably being hit with someone's running lights.[xeno]Julios wrote:ic - tx.
i'm looking back on the original photo - and it doesn't look washed out, or like shit, but this may just be my untrained eye.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:43 am
yea i thought about that - does anyone here actually think a standard camera flash could be responsible for that much illumination?
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:44 am
a normal onboard flash has a radius of about 2-3 meters, it didn't do anything for that shot, it didn't reach the cars[xeno]Julios wrote:ic - tx.
i'm looking back on the original photo - and it doesn't look washed out, or like shit, but this may just be my untrained eye.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:46 am
i'm just trying to understand what motivates doombrain's comment:
Doombrain wrote:Best part of this photo is whoever the moron is who took it used the flash, idiot.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:57 am
the glowing stop sign[xeno]Julios wrote:i'm just trying to understand what motivates doombrain's comment:
Doombrain wrote:Best part of this photo is whoever the moron is who took it used the flash, idiot.