Page 2 of 3

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:50 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
surprising :olo:

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:54 pm
by xchaser
trillian and xfire

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:08 pm
by Fender
trillian for personal (ICQ/AIM/Yahoo!)
exodus for work (Jabber)

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:31 pm
by Giraffe }{unter
GAIM

Re: whats the " chat" proggie everyone uses now.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:37 pm
by Giraffe }{unter
Dek wrote:
http://www.devilducky.com/media/37886/


This was at the Europe MTV awards a few months ago.. it would be pretty awesome to see a show like this..
Awesome, ever since I heard they did all their shows like this I was wanting to see a clip, thanks

Re: whats the " chat" proggie everyone uses now.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:43 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Giraffe }{unter wrote:
Dek wrote:
http://www.devilducky.com/media/37886/


This was at the Europe MTV awards a few months ago.. it would be pretty awesome to see a show like this..
Awesome, ever since I heard they did all their shows like this I was wanting to see a clip, thanks
lol how boring

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:34 pm
by bitWISE
Underpants? wrote:
Dave wrote:I use IRL
:olo: :olo: :olo:
people take 35 minutes and risk carpal tunnel to have a conversation that would normally take 3 minutes using mouth and ears.
WHY?
With lab overcoat and chalkboard on, let's do some motherfucking math.
Well, first we need to solve for the hideously ugly unknown "X" (which is a known as well as an unknown--think about it, the best concepts are the most subtle, yet startlingly obvious) and then factor in the ability to shove half a bag of cupcake minis in the face while "chatting" without the risk of aspirating said chunks of the chocolately sex-substitute and I had my logical explanation very neatly explained using linear algebra and biostats.
I don't see what your problem is. There are many situations in which an IM is better than a phone call.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:45 pm
by mjrpes
I remember when ICQ was the "cat's meow". Hahaha I love that phrase. *meow meow meow meow"

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:16 pm
by bitWISE
mjrpes wrote:I remember when ICQ was the "cat's meow". Hahaha I love that phrase. *meow meow meow meow"
I never really liked it. I was glad when the popular opinion changed.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:18 pm
by MKJ
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:trill and irc
irc is intergrated in trillian >:E

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:04 pm
by Underpants?
bitWISE wrote:
Underpants? wrote:
Dave wrote:I use IRL
:olo: :olo: :olo:
people take 35 minutes and risk carpal tunnel to have a conversation that would normally take 3 minutes using mouth and ears.
WHY?
With lab overcoat and chalkboard on, let's do some motherfucking math.
Well, first we need to solve for the hideously ugly unknown "X" (which is a known as well as an unknown--think about it, the best concepts are the most subtle, yet startlingly obvious) and then factor in the ability to shove half a bag of cupcake minis in the face while "chatting" without the risk of aspirating said chunks of the chocolately sex-substitute and I had my logical explanation very neatly explained using linear algebra and biostats.
I don't see what your problem is. There are many situations in which an IM is better than a phone call.
name one case, besides your inter-girlfriend overseas that no one's met irl, including her parents, you tea-bagging buttfuck?

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:17 pm
by Foo
lol what.

Who the fuck would phone someone on the other edge of their continent to organise a game of quake.

Do you read IP addresses out to people down the phone?

:olo:

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:19 pm
by Underpants?
Spoo :olo: most guys don't date women overseas just because they play quake :olo: what the fuck is wrong with you, anyway? :olo:

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:19 pm
by Foo
again in english

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:26 pm
by Tormentius
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:surprising :olo:
Isn't it though? :icon25:

I used to use ICQ and Yahoo as well, but my IM'ing has been pared down to a very limited contact list on one app: MSN. Its the app that the few people I do chat with online use so it was the most logical one to keep. That being said, the alternatives are just as good IMO (now that should surprise you).

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:48 pm
by brisk
Underpants? wrote:
Dave wrote:I use IRL
:olo: :olo: :olo:
people take 35 minutes and risk carpal tunnel to have a conversation that would normally take 3 minutes using mouth and ears.
WHY?
With lab overcoat and chalkboard on, let's do some motherfucking math.
Well, first we need to solve for the hideously ugly unknown "X" (which is a known as well as an unknown--think about it, the best concepts are the most subtle, yet startlingly obvious) and then factor in the ability to shove half a bag of cupcake minis in the face while "chatting" without the risk of aspirating said chunks of the chocolately sex-substitute and I had my logical explanation very neatly explained using linear algebra and biostats.
And yet, txt messages are more popular than voice calls with mobile phones. Your argument is flawed. IM is also free.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:55 pm
by Underpants?
by free you mean free if you are already paying for phone service/an internet connection, :olo: knob :olo:
popularity of something retarded makes it no less retarded, ass-wipe :olo:

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:00 pm
by Foo
Why so bitter?

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:12 pm
by dzjepp
COULD IT BE BECAUSE HE WILL NEVER PASS HIS GENES TO AN OFFSPRING?

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:18 pm
by Chupacabra
does GoogleTalk work with AIM?

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:22 pm
by brisk
Underpants? wrote:by free you mean free if you are already paying for phone service/an internet connection, :olo: knob :olo:
popularity of something retarded makes it no less retarded, ass-wipe :olo:
You have one testicle. Your opinion doesn't count.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:34 pm
by Iccy
Chupacabra wrote:does GoogleTalk work with AIM?
Works with jabber but i dont think aim cause it uses a different protocal. i could be wrong though.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:36 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
MKJ wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:trill and irc
irc is intergrated in trillian >:E
but i don't like it.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:38 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Tormentius wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:surprising :olo:
Isn't it though? :icon25:

I used to use ICQ and Yahoo as well, but my IM'ing has been pared down to a very limited contact list on one app: MSN. Its the app that the few people I do chat with online use so it was the most logical one to keep. That being said, the alternatives are just as good IMO (now that should surprise you).
ha! that does surprise me but at the same time it gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:38 pm
by Iccy
the irc integration in trillian is kinda .. well its gay.

But it does indeed work.