whats the " chat" proggie everyone uses now.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:50 pm

surprising

Post by **xchaser** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:54 pm

trillian and xfire

Post by **Fender** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:08 pm

trillian for personal (ICQ/AIM/Yahoo!)
exodus for work (Jabber)

Post by **Giraffe }{unter** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:31 pm

Post by **Giraffe }{unter** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:37 pm

Dek wrote:
http://www.devilducky.com/media/37886/

This was at the Europe MTV awards a few months ago.. it would be pretty awesome to see a show like this..

Awesome, ever since I heard they did all their shows like this I was wanting to see a clip, thanks

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:43 pm

Giraffe }{unter wrote:
Dek wrote:
http://www.devilducky.com/media/37886/

This was at the Europe MTV awards a few months ago.. it would be pretty awesome to see a show like this..
Awesome, ever since I heard they did all their shows like this I was wanting to see a clip, thanks

lol how boring

Post by **bitWISE** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:34 pm

Underpants? wrote:
Dave wrote:I use IRL

people take 35 minutes and risk carpal tunnel to have a conversation that would normally take 3 minutes using mouth and ears.
WHY?
With lab overcoat and chalkboard on, let's do some motherfucking math.
Well, first we need to solve for the hideously ugly unknown "X" (which is a known as well as an unknown--think about it, the best concepts are the most subtle, yet startlingly obvious) and then factor in the ability to shove half a bag of cupcake minis in the face while "chatting" without the risk of aspirating said chunks of the chocolately sex-substitute and I had my logical explanation very neatly explained using linear algebra and biostats.

I don't see what your problem is. There are many situations in which an IM is better than a phone call.

Post by **mjrpes** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:45 pm

I remember when ICQ was the "cat's meow". Hahaha I love that phrase. *meow meow meow meow"

Post by **bitWISE** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:16 pm

mjrpes wrote:I remember when ICQ was the "cat's meow". Hahaha I love that phrase. *meow meow meow meow"

I never really liked it. I was glad when the popular opinion changed.

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:18 pm

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:trill and irc

irc is intergrated in trillian

Post by **Underpants?** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:04 pm

bitWISE wrote:
Underpants? wrote:
Dave wrote:I use IRL

people take 35 minutes and risk carpal tunnel to have a conversation that would normally take 3 minutes using mouth and ears.
WHY?
With lab overcoat and chalkboard on, let's do some motherfucking math.
Well, first we need to solve for the hideously ugly unknown "X" (which is a known as well as an unknown--think about it, the best concepts are the most subtle, yet startlingly obvious) and then factor in the ability to shove half a bag of cupcake minis in the face while "chatting" without the risk of aspirating said chunks of the chocolately sex-substitute and I had my logical explanation very neatly explained using linear algebra and biostats.
I don't see what your problem is. There are many situations in which an IM is better than a phone call.

name one case, besides your inter-girlfriend overseas that no one's met irl, including her parents, you tea-bagging buttfuck?

Post by **Foo** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:17 pm

lol what.

Who the fuck would phone someone on the other edge of their continent to organise a game of quake.

Do you read IP addresses out to people down the phone?

Post by **Underpants?** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:19 pm

Spoo

most guys don't date women overseas just because they play quake

what the fuck is wrong with you, anyway?

Post by **Foo** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:19 pm

again in english

Post by **Tormentius** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:26 pm

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:surprising

Isn't it though? :icon25:

I used to use ICQ and Yahoo as well, but my IM'ing has been pared down to a very limited contact list on one app: MSN. Its the app that the few people I do chat with online use so it was the most logical one to keep. That being said, the alternatives are just as good IMO (now that should surprise you).

Post by **brisk** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:48 pm

Underpants? wrote:
Dave wrote:I use IRL

people take 35 minutes and risk carpal tunnel to have a conversation that would normally take 3 minutes using mouth and ears.
WHY?
With lab overcoat and chalkboard on, let's do some motherfucking math.
Well, first we need to solve for the hideously ugly unknown "X" (which is a known as well as an unknown--think about it, the best concepts are the most subtle, yet startlingly obvious) and then factor in the ability to shove half a bag of cupcake minis in the face while "chatting" without the risk of aspirating said chunks of the chocolately sex-substitute and I had my logical explanation very neatly explained using linear algebra and biostats.

And yet, txt messages are more popular than voice calls with mobile phones. Your argument is flawed. IM is also free.

Post by **Underpants?** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:55 pm

by free you mean free if you are already paying for phone service/an internet connection,

knob

popularity of something retarded makes it no less retarded, ass-wipe

Post by **Foo** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:00 pm

Why so bitter?

Post by **dzjepp** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:12 pm

COULD IT BE BECAUSE HE WILL NEVER PASS HIS GENES TO AN OFFSPRING?

Post by **Chupacabra** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:18 pm

does GoogleTalk work with AIM?

Post by **brisk** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:22 pm

Underpants? wrote:by free you mean free if you are already paying for phone service/an internet connection, knob
popularity of something retarded makes it no less retarded, ass-wipe

You have one testicle. Your opinion doesn't count.

Post by **Iccy** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:34 pm

Chupacabra wrote:does GoogleTalk work with AIM?

Works with jabber but i dont think aim cause it uses a different protocal. i could be wrong though.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:36 pm

MKJ wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:trill and irc
irc is intergrated in trillian

but i don't like it.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:38 pm

Tormentius wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:surprising
Isn't it though? :icon25:

I used to use ICQ and Yahoo as well, but my IM'ing has been pared down to a very limited contact list on one app: MSN. Its the app that the few people I do chat with online use so it was the most logical one to keep. That being said, the alternatives are just as good IMO (now that should surprise you).

ha! that does surprise me but at the same time it gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.

Post by **Iccy** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:38 pm

the irc integration in trillian is kinda .. well its gay.

But it does indeed work.

whats the " chat" proggie everyone uses now.

Re: whats the " chat" proggie everyone uses now.

Re: whats the " chat" proggie everyone uses now.