Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:09 pm
by R00k
Nightshade wrote:Precisely what I was saying. A far cry from the Nixon days...
LOL. In the Nixon days, spying and wiretapping Democratic campaign headquarters got you impeached.
Today it just gets you elected.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:15 pm
by Nightshade
OMG!!! NATIONAL SECURITY!!!!
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:23 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
lol
Ihr Fuher hatte gesprochen.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:32 pm
by Ezekiel
Foo wrote:Someone needs to do a 1v1 interview with the guy and start asking proper fucking questions.
Bush vs Paxman. I'd pay to see that.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:34 pm
by R00k
GONNAFISTYA wrote:lol
Ihr Fuher hatte gesprochen.
Der Fatty hast auch gesprachen. "Wir müssen die Kuchen consumen!"
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:37 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
R00k wrote:
Der Fatty hast auch gesprachen. "Wir müssen die Kuchen consumen!"
Babel Fisch verläßt Sie wieder.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:38 pm
by seremtan
Nightshade wrote:Yeah, the press have become a bunch of ratings obsessed pussies. Even Bob Woodward's gone over to the dark side, from what I hear.
there's still seymour hersh...
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:40 pm
by seremtan
Ezekiel wrote:Foo wrote:Someone needs to do a 1v1 interview with the guy and start asking proper fucking questions.
Bush vs Paxman. I'd pay to see that.
paxman
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:45 pm
by Ezekiel
seremtan wrote:paxman
Would you prefer Richard and Judy... ?
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:08 pm
by R00k
GONNAFISTYA wrote:R00k wrote:
Der Fatty hast auch gesprachen. "Wir müssen die Kuchen consumen!"
Babel Fisch verläßt Sie wieder.
Sadly, if I'd used Babelfish it would probably have come out a lot better.
Straight from my memory, and rubbing together the two surviving brain cells from high school and college classes.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:11 pm
by hate
:icon14:
__________
veto power
checks and balances
democracy
fuck off
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:28 pm
by R00k
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:31 am
by Freakaloin
Freakaloin wrote:R00k wrote:Freakaloin wrote:he seriously just denied that he's a dictator...i shit u not...
Is this a lie? Because that implies somebody asked him if he's a dictator. Surely that didn't happen.
reporter asked him if the war on terror is gonna go on for decades, will this unchecked power go on forever...bush said something about it not being unchecked power and it implies the president is a dictator...and he resents that...
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/12/19.html#a6384
bush acts like mussolini...
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:39 am
by Big Kahuna Burger
politics, its a joke
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:26 am
by seremtan
Ezekiel wrote:seremtan wrote:paxman
Would you prefer Richard and Judy... ?
is that the only choice i have? i don't think so
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:05 am
by MKJ
is this press conf transcribed somewhere ?
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:14 am
by Ryoki
MKJ wrote:is this press conf transcribed somewhere ?
http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/nyt154.html
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:05 am
by MKJ
We added 215,000 new jobs in November. We've added nearly 4.5 million new jobs since May of 2003.
the war economy is making new jobs, momo, not you
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:12 am
by Dave
MKJ wrote:We added 215,000 new jobs in November. We've added nearly 4.5 million new jobs since May of 2003.
the war economy is making new jobs, momo, not you
Well, if Bush made the war, then technically Bush made the jobs...
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:15 am
by MKJ
The other question was — you asked a multiple-part question.
Q. Yes, I did.
A. Thank you for violating the multiple-part question rule.
Q. I didn't know there was a law on that.
A. There's not a law. It's an executive order. In this case not monitored by the Congress, nor is there any administrative oversight.
Q. Well, without breaking any laws, back on domestic spying: Making the case for that can you give us some examples —
A. Oh, I've got you, yeah, I'm sorry.
No, I'm not going to talk about that because it would help give the enemy notification and/or perhaps signal them methods and uses and sources.
:olo
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:16 am
by MKJ
Dave wrote:MKJ wrote:We added 215,000 new jobs in November. We've added nearly 4.5 million new jobs since May of 2003.
the war economy is making new jobs, momo, not you
Well, if Bush made the war, then technically Bush made the jobs...
he's claiming it to be a good thing though
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:15 pm
by seremtan
Dave wrote:MKJ wrote:We added 215,000 new jobs in November. We've added nearly 4.5 million new jobs since May of 2003.
the war economy is making new jobs, momo, not you
Well, if Bush made the war, then technically Bush made the jobs...
international aggression: the ultimate employment scheme
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:17 pm
by Freakaloin
most these jobs r in the service industries...so unemployment is low cuz everyone is working at taco bell...gg...
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:26 pm
by Freakaloin
another documented bush lie...from april 2004...
"Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases ... 420-2.html
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:27 pm
by R00k
The war hasn't made many jobs at all, compared to previous wars. The majority of them that it has created are overseas, from Iraq to China to India to Korea.
We don't manufacture anything over here anymore, how could a war create jobs except for soldiers?